Player chronotype does not affect shooting accuracy at different times of the day in a professional, male basketball team: a pilot study

IF 1 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep Science Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI:10.5935/1984-0063.20220014
Michael John Stacey Pengelly, J. Guy, Nathan Elsworthy, A. Scanlan, M. Lastella
{"title":"Player chronotype does not affect shooting accuracy at different times of the day in a professional, male basketball team: a pilot study","authors":"Michael John Stacey Pengelly, J. Guy, Nathan Elsworthy, A. Scanlan, M. Lastella","doi":"10.5935/1984-0063.20220014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Athlete chronotype has been documented to underpin diurnal variations in skill execution across various team sports. However, no research has explored the effects of athlete chronotype on basketball-specific skills at different times of the day. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore diurnal variations in basketball shooting accuracy according to chronotype. Professional, male basketball players (n = 13) completed a Morningness- Eveningness Questionnaire and were categorised into chronotypes using a tertile split technique (morning-types: n = 4; neither-types: n = 4; evening-types: n = 5). Players completed separate trials of a shooting accuracy test in the morning (08:00-09:30h) and afternoon (15:00-16:30h) with each trial consisting of 20 shots attempted from four court locations at either two- or three-point distances and one-shot location from the free-throw line (100 shots in total). Each shot attempt was scored using a 0-3-point scale with higher scores awarded to more accurate shots. Non-significant ( p >0.05) differences in shooting scores were evident between morning and afternoon trials for each chronotype group, with small-large effects in shooting scores favouring the morning across groups. Moreover, non-significant ( p >0.05) differences in shooting scores were apparent between chronotype groups in the morning ( small-large effects) and afternoon ( moderate-large effects). Shooting accuracy appears to remain consistent across morning and afternoon performances irrespective of player chronotype in a professional basketball team, suggesting coaches may not need to schedule training sessions involving shooting tasks at specific times of the day to optimise shooting accuracy in players.","PeriodicalId":21848,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Science","volume":"24 1","pages":"149 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-0063.20220014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Athlete chronotype has been documented to underpin diurnal variations in skill execution across various team sports. However, no research has explored the effects of athlete chronotype on basketball-specific skills at different times of the day. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore diurnal variations in basketball shooting accuracy according to chronotype. Professional, male basketball players (n = 13) completed a Morningness- Eveningness Questionnaire and were categorised into chronotypes using a tertile split technique (morning-types: n = 4; neither-types: n = 4; evening-types: n = 5). Players completed separate trials of a shooting accuracy test in the morning (08:00-09:30h) and afternoon (15:00-16:30h) with each trial consisting of 20 shots attempted from four court locations at either two- or three-point distances and one-shot location from the free-throw line (100 shots in total). Each shot attempt was scored using a 0-3-point scale with higher scores awarded to more accurate shots. Non-significant ( p >0.05) differences in shooting scores were evident between morning and afternoon trials for each chronotype group, with small-large effects in shooting scores favouring the morning across groups. Moreover, non-significant ( p >0.05) differences in shooting scores were apparent between chronotype groups in the morning ( small-large effects) and afternoon ( moderate-large effects). Shooting accuracy appears to remain consistent across morning and afternoon performances irrespective of player chronotype in a professional basketball team, suggesting coaches may not need to schedule training sessions involving shooting tasks at specific times of the day to optimise shooting accuracy in players.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项初步研究表明,运动员的睡眠类型不会影响职业男子篮球队在一天中不同时间的投篮准确性
运动员的时间类型已经被记录下来,以支持各种团队运动中技能执行的昼夜变化。然而,目前还没有研究探讨运动员的睡眠类型在一天中不同时间对篮球特定技能的影响。因此,本研究的目的是探讨不同时型的篮球投篮准确率的日变化。职业男子篮球运动员(n = 13)完成了一份晨型-夜型问卷,并使用五分位数分割技术将其分为不同的睡眠类型(n = 4;两种类型:n = 4;运动员在上午(08:00-09:30)和下午(15:00-16:30)分别完成投篮精度测试,每次测试包括在四个场地的二分或三分距离和罚球线的一投位置尝试20次投篮(共100次)。每次投篮尝试都采用0-3分的评分标准,投篮越准确得分越高。各时间类型组的射击得分在上午和下午的差异均不显著(p >0.05),各组间射击得分在上午有明显的小-大效应。此外,上午(小-大效应)和下午(中大效应)的射击得分在不同时间类型组之间差异不显著(p >0.05)。在职业篮球队中,无论球员的睡眠类型如何,上午和下午的投篮命中率似乎都保持一致,这表明教练可能不需要在一天中的特定时间安排涉及投篮任务的训练课程来优化球员的投篮命中率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Science
Sleep Science CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Can Improving Postoperative Sleep Speed Up Surgical Recovery?: Sleep Sci 2024; 17:3:335-338: São Paulo, September 20, 2024. Factors Related to the Sleep Duration of 3-Month-Old Infants. Could a Habitual Sleep Restriction of One-two Hours Be Detrimental to the Benefits of Resistance Training? Validation of a Portable Respiratory Monitoring System for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Crossectional Study. Sleep Debt and Insulin Resistance: What's Worse, Sleep Deprivation or Sleep Restriction?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1