From the Specter of Polygamy to the Spectacle of Postcoloniality: A Response to Bai on Confucianism, Liberalism, and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate

IF 1.3 1区 哲学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics and Religion Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI:10.1017/S1755048321000304
Yao Lin
{"title":"From the Specter of Polygamy to the Spectacle of Postcoloniality: A Response to Bai on Confucianism, Liberalism, and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate","authors":"Yao Lin","doi":"10.1017/S1755048321000304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Confucianism and Same-Sex Marriage, argues for a moderate Confucian position on same-sex marriage, one its legalization and endeavors to use public opinion and social and political policies to encourage heterosexual marriages, and to prevent same-sex marriages from becoming the majority form of marriages 2021, the downright homophobia Confucians in China his rendition “ show[s] a different version of Confucianism that challenges the received perception of Confucianism that it is deeply conservative, a perception that often lies at the core of the rejection of its contemporary relevance, especially by the so-called ‘ liberals ’ in China and elsewhere ” (Bai 2021, 133). Furthermore, Bai claims that his moderate Confucianism is normatively preferrable to “ the typical liberal or individualist position ” of a marriage equality supporter, because the specter of polygamy — the conservative trope of invoking polygamy as a reductio ad absurdum against same-sex marriage — imposes “ a serious challenge ” to liberals but not to moderate Confucians (Bai 2021, 146, 153).","PeriodicalId":45674,"journal":{"name":"Politics and Religion","volume":"5 1","pages":"215 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048321000304","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Confucianism and Same-Sex Marriage, argues for a moderate Confucian position on same-sex marriage, one its legalization and endeavors to use public opinion and social and political policies to encourage heterosexual marriages, and to prevent same-sex marriages from becoming the majority form of marriages 2021, the downright homophobia Confucians in China his rendition “ show[s] a different version of Confucianism that challenges the received perception of Confucianism that it is deeply conservative, a perception that often lies at the core of the rejection of its contemporary relevance, especially by the so-called ‘ liberals ’ in China and elsewhere ” (Bai 2021, 133). Furthermore, Bai claims that his moderate Confucianism is normatively preferrable to “ the typical liberal or individualist position ” of a marriage equality supporter, because the specter of polygamy — the conservative trope of invoking polygamy as a reductio ad absurdum against same-sex marriage — imposes “ a serious challenge ” to liberals but not to moderate Confucians (Bai 2021, 146, 153).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从一夫多妻制的幽灵到后殖民主义的奇观:白对儒家、自由主义和同性婚姻辩论的回应
《儒学与同性婚姻》,主张儒家对同性婚姻持温和立场,主张同性婚姻合法化,并努力利用公众舆论和社会政治政策鼓励异性婚姻,防止同性婚姻成为主流婚姻形式。他的演绎“展示了一个不同版本的儒家思想,挑战了儒家思想根深蒂固的保守观念,这种观念往往是拒绝其当代意义的核心,尤其是中国和其他地方所谓的‘自由主义者’”(Bai 2021, 133)。此外,白声称,他的温和儒学在规范上优于婚姻平等支持者的“典型的自由主义或个人主义立场”,因为一夫多妻制的阴影——援引一夫多妻制作为反对同性婚姻的简化和荒谬的保守修辞——对自由派构成了“严重挑战”,但对温和儒学家却没有(白2021,146,153)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Politics and Religion is an international journal publishing high quality peer-reviewed research on the multifaceted relationship between religion and politics around the world. The scope of published work is intentionally broad and we invite innovative work from all methodological approaches in the major subfields of political science, including international relations, American politics, comparative politics, and political theory, that seeks to improve our understanding of religion’s role in some aspect of world politics. The Editors invite normative and empirical investigations of the public representation of religion, the religious and political institutions that shape religious presence in the public square, and the role of religion in shaping citizenship, broadly considered, as well as pieces that attempt to advance our methodological tools for examining religious influence in political life.
期刊最新文献
Do we need a radical redefinition of secularism? A critique of Charles Taylor On Salafism. Concepts and Contexts By Azmi Bishara. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2022. vii+228 pp. $60.00 hardcover. Asymmetric conflation: QAnon and the political cooptation of religion The ingroup love and outgroup hate of Christian Nationalism: experimental evidence about the implementation of the rule of law Evangelicals and Electoral Politics in Latin America: A Kingdom of this World By Taylor C. Boas. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2023. ix+317 pp. $99.99 cloth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1