Repetitive Eating Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity of Turkish Version and Correlates of Grazing Behavior

A. Gormez, R. Elbay, Ertugrul Saral, Bahtiyar Ozer, M. Karadere
{"title":"Repetitive Eating Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity of Turkish Version and Correlates of Grazing Behavior","authors":"A. Gormez, R. Elbay, Ertugrul Saral, Bahtiyar Ozer, M. Karadere","doi":"10.5455/pbs.20230109081332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Grazing behaviour which is defined as repetitive and unplanned eating behaviour with small amounts of food over a period of time , has been increasingly recognised among people with obesity and eating disorders, as well as in the general population The Repetitive Eating Questionnaire (Rep(eat)-Q) is a 12 item self-report scale which was designed to measure the grazing behaviour. It demonstrating a compulsive and non-compulsive forms of grazing in previous studies. The aim of the present study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version Rep(eat)-Q in a community sample from Turkey. Method: Permission was taken from the designer of the measure . Ethical approval was granted from the local ethic Committee. The Turkish version was developed by translation and back-translation and the opinion from the local experts were obtained. The Rep(eat)-Q along with a purpose-designed socio-demographic form and other self-report measures (SCOFF eating questionnaire,, Yale Food Addiction Scale, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire ) were administered online to 263 of people from a convenient sample using a snowball technique. Internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity were calculated. Confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted for the factor structure. Results: The mean age of participants were 34.4 with 77.2 % female and mean body mass index (BMI) of 24.7. As in the original scale, the fit of the two-factor structure (compulsive grazing and repetitive eating) was analysed by Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA showed that the Turkish version had a two-dimensional structure as with the original form and indicated good fit (ε2 = 122, df = 48, ε2 / df = 0.77; RMSEA = 0.973; CFI = 0.962; TLI = 0.981; SRMR = 0.028). In our study, positive and moderately significant correlation between BMI and Rep(eat)-Q compulsive subscale was found; no significant correlation was found between the repetitive subscale and the BMI (r= 0.156; p=0.07). The Rep(eat)-Q scales showed excellent internal consistency both for the whole scale and the two subscales (total score Cronbach's alpha 0.947; compulsive grazing Cronbach's alpha 0.931; repetitive eating Cronbach's alpha 0.916). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that Turkish version of Rep(eat)-Q seems to be a valid and reliable tool in assessing grazing behaviour in a non-clinical Turkish sample . It also confirmed the proposed two factor structure ( compulsive and non-compulsive) supporting the two subtypes of grazing behaviour.. Further studies are needed to assess its validity and reliability in clinical subgroups.","PeriodicalId":74168,"journal":{"name":"MedPress psychiatry and behavioral sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedPress psychiatry and behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/pbs.20230109081332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Grazing behaviour which is defined as repetitive and unplanned eating behaviour with small amounts of food over a period of time , has been increasingly recognised among people with obesity and eating disorders, as well as in the general population The Repetitive Eating Questionnaire (Rep(eat)-Q) is a 12 item self-report scale which was designed to measure the grazing behaviour. It demonstrating a compulsive and non-compulsive forms of grazing in previous studies. The aim of the present study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version Rep(eat)-Q in a community sample from Turkey. Method: Permission was taken from the designer of the measure . Ethical approval was granted from the local ethic Committee. The Turkish version was developed by translation and back-translation and the opinion from the local experts were obtained. The Rep(eat)-Q along with a purpose-designed socio-demographic form and other self-report measures (SCOFF eating questionnaire,, Yale Food Addiction Scale, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire ) were administered online to 263 of people from a convenient sample using a snowball technique. Internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity were calculated. Confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted for the factor structure. Results: The mean age of participants were 34.4 with 77.2 % female and mean body mass index (BMI) of 24.7. As in the original scale, the fit of the two-factor structure (compulsive grazing and repetitive eating) was analysed by Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA showed that the Turkish version had a two-dimensional structure as with the original form and indicated good fit (ε2 = 122, df = 48, ε2 / df = 0.77; RMSEA = 0.973; CFI = 0.962; TLI = 0.981; SRMR = 0.028). In our study, positive and moderately significant correlation between BMI and Rep(eat)-Q compulsive subscale was found; no significant correlation was found between the repetitive subscale and the BMI (r= 0.156; p=0.07). The Rep(eat)-Q scales showed excellent internal consistency both for the whole scale and the two subscales (total score Cronbach's alpha 0.947; compulsive grazing Cronbach's alpha 0.931; repetitive eating Cronbach's alpha 0.916). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that Turkish version of Rep(eat)-Q seems to be a valid and reliable tool in assessing grazing behaviour in a non-clinical Turkish sample . It also confirmed the proposed two factor structure ( compulsive and non-compulsive) supporting the two subtypes of grazing behaviour.. Further studies are needed to assess its validity and reliability in clinical subgroups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复进食问卷:土耳其语版本的信度和效度及放牧行为的相关因素
放牧行为被定义为在一段时间内以少量食物进行重复和计划外的进食行为,在肥胖和饮食失调人群以及普通人群中已经越来越多地认识到重复性进食问卷(Rep(eat)-Q)是一个12项自我报告量表,旨在衡量放牧行为。在之前的研究中,它展示了强迫性和非强迫性的放牧形式。本研究的目的是评估土耳其版本Rep(eat)-Q在土耳其社区样本中的效度和信度。方法:经措施设计者同意。获得当地伦理委员会的伦理批准。通过翻译和反翻译,获得了当地专家的意见,制定了土耳其语版本。Rep(eat)-Q以及专门设计的社会人口统计表格和其他自我报告测量(SCOFF饮食问卷,耶鲁食物成瘾量表,饮食失调检查问卷)使用滚雪球技术在线对263名方便的样本进行了管理。计算了内部一致性、收敛性和发散性效度。并对因子结构进行验证性因子分析。结果:参与者的平均年龄为34.4岁,女性占77.2%,平均体重指数(BMI)为24.7。与原量表一样,采用验证性因子分析(Confirmatory factor analysis, CFA)分析双因素结构(强迫性放牧和重复性进食)的拟合度。CFA结果表明,土耳其语版本与原始形式具有二维结构,拟合良好(ε2 = 122, df = 48, ε2 / df = 0.77;Rmsea = 0.973;Cfi = 0.962;Tli = 0.981;SRMR = 0.028)。在我们的研究中,BMI与Rep(eat)-Q强迫量表呈正相关且有中显著性;重复分量表与BMI无显著相关(r= 0.156;p = 0.07)。Rep(eat)-Q量表在整体量表和两个子量表上均表现出极好的内部一致性(总分Cronbach’s alpha 0.947;强迫放牧Cronbach’s alpha 0.931;重复进食Cronbach’s α 0.916)。结论:本研究的结果表明,土耳其版本的Rep(eat)-Q似乎是评估非临床土耳其样本放牧行为的有效和可靠的工具。它还证实了所提出的两种因素结构(强迫性和非强迫性)支持两种放牧行为亚型。需要进一步的研究来评估其在临床亚组中的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring Disgust Proneness Using the Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised: Psychometric Properties with Factorial Invariance in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Non-Clinical Samples Relationship Between Perceptions of COVID-19 and Social Media Use: A Cross-Sectional Study in Turkey The Development of a Scale to Measure Children’s Fear of Nursing Interventions and Instruments Used in Hospital The Effects of Child and Adolescent Attention Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder and Associated Executive Function Deficits on Family Functioning The Relationship between Functioning Levels and Exercise Addiction, Personality, and Temperament Characteristics in Patients with Bipolar Disorder during Remission Period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1