Population-level relative effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines and the contribution of naturally acquired immunity

Kayoko Shioda, Yang-ling Chen, M. Collins, B. Lopman
{"title":"Population-level relative effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines and the contribution of naturally acquired immunity","authors":"Kayoko Shioda, Yang-ling Chen, M. Collins, B. Lopman","doi":"10.1101/2022.10.04.22280689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 can be induced by natural infection or vaccination or both. The interaction between vaccine-induced immunity and naturally acquired immunity at the population level has been understudied. Methods: We used regression models to evaluate whether the impact of COVID-19 vaccines differed across states with different levels of naturally acquired immunity from March 2021 to April 2022 in the United States. Analysis was conducted for three evaluation periods separately (Alpha, Delta, and Omicron waves). As a proxy of the proportion of the population with naturally acquired immunity, we used either the reported seroprevalence or the estimated proportion of the population ever infected in each state. Results: COVID-19 mortality decreased as the coverage of [≥]1 dose increased among people [≥]65 years of age, and this effect did not vary by seroprevalence or the proportion of the total population ever infected. Seroprevalence and the proportion ever infected were not associated with COVID-19 mortality, after controlling for vaccine coverage. These findings were consistent in all evaluation periods. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a sustained reduction in mortality at the state level during the Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods. The effect did not vary by naturally acquired immunity.","PeriodicalId":22572,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.04.22280689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 can be induced by natural infection or vaccination or both. The interaction between vaccine-induced immunity and naturally acquired immunity at the population level has been understudied. Methods: We used regression models to evaluate whether the impact of COVID-19 vaccines differed across states with different levels of naturally acquired immunity from March 2021 to April 2022 in the United States. Analysis was conducted for three evaluation periods separately (Alpha, Delta, and Omicron waves). As a proxy of the proportion of the population with naturally acquired immunity, we used either the reported seroprevalence or the estimated proportion of the population ever infected in each state. Results: COVID-19 mortality decreased as the coverage of [≥]1 dose increased among people [≥]65 years of age, and this effect did not vary by seroprevalence or the proportion of the total population ever infected. Seroprevalence and the proportion ever infected were not associated with COVID-19 mortality, after controlling for vaccine coverage. These findings were consistent in all evaluation periods. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a sustained reduction in mortality at the state level during the Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods. The effect did not vary by naturally acquired immunity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19疫苗的人群水平相对有效性和自然获得性免疫的贡献
背景:对SARS-CoV-2的免疫保护可以通过自然感染或接种疫苗或两者同时诱导。在人群水平上,疫苗诱导免疫和自然获得性免疫之间的相互作用尚未得到充分研究。方法:采用回归模型评估2021年3月至2022年4月美国不同自然获得性免疫水平的州之间COVID-19疫苗的影响是否存在差异。分别对三个评估期(α波、δ波和欧米克隆波)进行分析。作为具有自然获得性免疫的人口比例的代表,我们使用报告的血清流行率或每个州感染人口的估计比例。结果:在[≥]65岁的人群中,COVID-19死亡率随着[≥]1剂量覆盖率的增加而下降,并且这种效果不受血清阳性率或总感染人群比例的影响。在控制疫苗覆盖率后,血清阳性率和曾经感染的比例与COVID-19死亡率无关。这些发现在所有评估期间都是一致的。结论:在Alpha、Delta和Omicron期间,COVID-19疫苗接种与州一级死亡率的持续下降有关。这种效果不因自然获得的免疫力而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gambaran Infeksi Soil Transmitted Helminth pada Petani Penyitas Erupsi Gunung Semeru Pencegahan Phlebitis dengan Tindakan Flushing: Literature Review Burden of respiratory syncytial virus-associated acute respiratory infections during pregnancy. The Role of Fibrinogen on Abortion Incidence in Pregnant Women with Toxoplasmosis Hubungan Faktor Pelayanan Pertama Masyarakat Pada Warga Yang Terpapar Covid Dengan Kesiapan Beradaptasi Pada COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1