Comparison of Model Predictive Control and Distance Constrained-Adaptive Concurrent Dynamic Programming Algorithms for Extended Range Electric Vehicle Optimal Energy Management

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of the Asme Pub Date : 2021-04-15 DOI:10.1115/1.4050884
A. Kalia, B. Fabien
{"title":"Comparison of Model Predictive Control and Distance Constrained-Adaptive Concurrent Dynamic Programming Algorithms for Extended Range Electric Vehicle Optimal Energy Management","authors":"A. Kalia, B. Fabien","doi":"10.1115/1.4050884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Intelligent energy management of hybrid electric vehicles is feasible with a priori information of route and driving conditions. Model predictive control (MPC) with finite horizon road grade preview has been proposed as a viable predictive energy management approach. We propose that our novel distance constrained-adaptive concurrent dynamic programming (DC-ACDP) approach can provide better energy management than MPC without any road grade information in context of an extended range electric vehicle (EREV). In this article, we have evaluated and compared the MPC and DC-ACDP energy management strategies for a real-world driving scenario. The simulations were conducted for a 160 km drive with road grade variation between +4% and –1%. Results show that the DC-ACDP approach is near-optimal and improves overall energy consumption by a maximum of 4.25%, in comparison to the simple MPC with a finite horizon road grade preview implementation. Additionally, a higher value for energy storage system state of charge (SOC) tracking penalty p2 results in the net energy consumption for MPC to converge toward that of DC-ACDP. A combination of the MPC and DC-ACDP approach is also evaluated with only 1.25% maximum improvement over simple MPC.","PeriodicalId":54846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of the Asme","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Intelligent energy management of hybrid electric vehicles is feasible with a priori information of route and driving conditions. Model predictive control (MPC) with finite horizon road grade preview has been proposed as a viable predictive energy management approach. We propose that our novel distance constrained-adaptive concurrent dynamic programming (DC-ACDP) approach can provide better energy management than MPC without any road grade information in context of an extended range electric vehicle (EREV). In this article, we have evaluated and compared the MPC and DC-ACDP energy management strategies for a real-world driving scenario. The simulations were conducted for a 160 km drive with road grade variation between +4% and –1%. Results show that the DC-ACDP approach is near-optimal and improves overall energy consumption by a maximum of 4.25%, in comparison to the simple MPC with a finite horizon road grade preview implementation. Additionally, a higher value for energy storage system state of charge (SOC) tracking penalty p2 results in the net energy consumption for MPC to converge toward that of DC-ACDP. A combination of the MPC and DC-ACDP approach is also evaluated with only 1.25% maximum improvement over simple MPC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增程式电动汽车最优能量管理模型预测控制与距离约束自适应并发动态规划算法比较
混合动力汽车的智能能量管理是可行的,具有先验的路线和行驶条件信息。具有有限水平路面等级预览的模型预测控制(MPC)是一种可行的能源预测管理方法。我们提出,在增程式电动汽车(EREV)的情况下,我们的新型距离约束自适应并发动态规划(DC-ACDP)方法可以提供比没有任何道路等级信息的MPC更好的能量管理。在本文中,我们对MPC和DC-ACDP能源管理策略进行了评估和比较。模拟是在160公里的行驶中进行的,道路坡度变化在+4%到-1%之间。结果表明,与具有有限水平道路等级预览实现的简单MPC相比,DC-ACDP方法接近最优,可将总能耗提高4.25%。此外,储能系统荷电状态(SOC)跟踪惩罚p2值越高,MPC的净能耗就越接近DC-ACDP。MPC和DC-ACDP方法的组合也被评估为仅比简单MPC提高1.25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
24.0 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control publishes theoretical and applied original papers in the traditional areas implied by its name, as well as papers in interdisciplinary areas. Theoretical papers should present new theoretical developments and knowledge for controls of dynamical systems together with clear engineering motivation for the new theory. New theory or results that are only of mathematical interest without a clear engineering motivation or have a cursory relevance only are discouraged. "Application" is understood to include modeling, simulation of realistic systems, and corroboration of theory with emphasis on demonstrated practicality.
期刊最新文献
Spiking-Free Disturbance Observer-Based Sliding-Mode Control for Mismatched Uncertain System Current Imbalance in Dissimilar Parallel-Connected Batteries and the Fate of Degradation Convergence Self-Optimizing Vapor Compression Cycles Online With Bayesian Optimization Under Local Search Region Constraints Nonlinear Temperature Control of Additive Friction Stir Deposition Evaluated On an Echo State Network Closed-Loop Control and Plant Co-Design of a Hybrid Electric Unmanned Air Vehicle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1