Aplicação da análise de componentes principais na cinemática da marcha de idosas com osteoartrite de joelho

Renata Noce Kirkwood, R. A. Resende, C. M. B. Magalhães, Henrique de Alencar Gomes, S. A. Mingoti, R. Sampaio
{"title":"Aplicação da análise de componentes principais na cinemática da marcha de idosas com osteoartrite de joelho","authors":"Renata Noce Kirkwood, R. A. Resende, C. M. B. Magalhães, Henrique de Alencar Gomes, S. A. Mingoti, R. Sampaio","doi":"10.1590/S1413-35552011000100007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The applicability of gait analysis has been implemented with the introduction of the principal component analysis (PCA), a statistical data reduction technique that allows the comparison of the whole cycle between groups of individuals. OBJECTIVES: Applying PCA, to compare the kinematics of the knee joint during gait, in the frontal and sagittal planes, between a group of elderly women with and without diagnosis in the initial and moderate stages of Osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A total of 38 elderly women (69.6±8.1 years) with knee OA and 40 asymptomatic (70.3±7.7 years) participated on this study. The kinematics was obtained using the Qualisys Pro-reflex system. RESULTS: The OA group showed decreased gait velocity and stride length (p<0.05) and was characterized with higher WOMAC pain score. In the frontal plane, the between-group differences of the components were not significant. In the sagittal plane, three principal components explained 99.7% of the data variance. Discriminant analysis indicated that component 2 and 3 could classify correctly 71.8% of the individuals. However, CP3, which captures the difference in the flexion knee angle magnitude during gait, was the variable with higher discrimination power between groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCA is an effective multivariate statistical technique to analyse the kinematic gait waveform during the gait cycle. The smaller knee flexion angle in the OA group was appointed as a discriminatory factor between groups, therefore, it should be considered in the physical therapy evaluation and treatment of elderly women with knee OA.","PeriodicalId":21195,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","volume":"147 1","pages":"52-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552011000100007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The applicability of gait analysis has been implemented with the introduction of the principal component analysis (PCA), a statistical data reduction technique that allows the comparison of the whole cycle between groups of individuals. OBJECTIVES: Applying PCA, to compare the kinematics of the knee joint during gait, in the frontal and sagittal planes, between a group of elderly women with and without diagnosis in the initial and moderate stages of Osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A total of 38 elderly women (69.6±8.1 years) with knee OA and 40 asymptomatic (70.3±7.7 years) participated on this study. The kinematics was obtained using the Qualisys Pro-reflex system. RESULTS: The OA group showed decreased gait velocity and stride length (p<0.05) and was characterized with higher WOMAC pain score. In the frontal plane, the between-group differences of the components were not significant. In the sagittal plane, three principal components explained 99.7% of the data variance. Discriminant analysis indicated that component 2 and 3 could classify correctly 71.8% of the individuals. However, CP3, which captures the difference in the flexion knee angle magnitude during gait, was the variable with higher discrimination power between groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCA is an effective multivariate statistical technique to analyse the kinematic gait waveform during the gait cycle. The smaller knee flexion angle in the OA group was appointed as a discriminatory factor between groups, therefore, it should be considered in the physical therapy evaluation and treatment of elderly women with knee OA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主成分分析在老年膝关节骨关节炎患者步态运动学中的应用
背景:随着主成分分析(PCA)的引入,步态分析的适用性已经实现,主成分分析是一种统计数据简化技术,允许在个体群体之间比较整个周期。目的:应用PCA,比较一组患有和未诊断为早期和中度骨关节炎(OA)的老年妇女在步态中膝关节的运动学,在额骨和矢状面。方法:38例老年女性膝关节OA患者(69.6±8.1岁)和40例无症状患者(70.3±7.7岁)参加本研究。运动学分析采用Qualisys Pro-reflex系统。结果:OA组患者步速和步长明显降低(p<0.05), WOMAC疼痛评分较高。额平面各成分组间差异无统计学意义。在矢状面,三个主成分解释了99.7%的数据方差。判别分析表明,成分2和成分3的分类正确率为71.8%。然而,CP3是组间判别力较高的变量,它捕捉了步态中膝关节屈曲角度的大小差异。结论:PCA是一种有效的多变量统计技术,可以分析步态周期内的运动步态波形。OA组膝关节屈曲角度较小被认为是组间的区别因素,因此在老年女性膝关节OA的物理治疗评价和治疗中应予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the use of Kinect technology as a therapeutic alternative to improve physical capacities in older adults Results of the application of pulmonary physiotherapy in a 38-year-old post-COVID19 patient after severe pneumonia and type 2 diabetes mellitus Application of neurohabilitation therapy in a six-month-old pediatric patient as a treatment for neurodevelopmental delay (clinical case) Estudio comparativo entre el índice de masa corporal y el control postural en alumnos sanos de la carrera de Terapia Física de la Universidad Politécnica de Pachuca Acompañamiento terapéutico para la aceptación o rechazo de una prótesis: Caso de paciente infantil con amputación de miembro superior izquierdo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1