6ER-036 Deprescribing tools for the elderly: a systematic review

M. M. Trueba, A. R. Pérez, B. Rubio, S. S. Fidalgo
{"title":"6ER-036 Deprescribing tools for the elderly: a systematic review","authors":"M. M. Trueba, A. R. Pérez, B. Rubio, S. S. Fidalgo","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Deprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account the preferences of the patient, prognosis and the environment. This strategy acquires special relevance in elderly patients as they are exposed to numerous adverse effects and interactions. Aim and objectives To identify the deprescribing tools (DT) aimed at elderly patients available in the scientific literature and their main characteristics. Material and methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE for relevant literature published up to April 2020, applying the PRISMA method. The search strategy included terms for deprescribing, study population (aged OR elderly) and deprescribing strategies (tool OR process OR criteria OR algorithm). Inclusion criteria were: observational/experimental studies which created or developed a DT in elderly patients. Exclusion criteria were: studies where the DT was aimed at a specific medication, pharmacological group or pathology. Tools identified were analysed according to whether they were criterion/algorithm type. Results 13/485 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 11 tools were identified: 5 ‘algorithm based tools’ and 6 ‘criterion based tools’ (2 of the articles developed the validation of 2 criterion based tools). All tools were aimed at elderly patients, with peculiarities regarding their design, population, setting of application and items that formed the tool. Algorithm based tools The methodology used for its development was not specified. Population: two of them focused specifically on patients with limited life expectancy. Settings of application: two algorithms were applied to institutionalised patients, one to hospitalised patients and the remaining two did not specify the scenario. Criterion based tools Five used the Delphi method for their design and development. Population: one was focused on patients with multimorbidity or similar characteristics and two were aimed at patients with limited life expectancy. Settings of application: three tools were aimed at institutionalised patients, two other tools were aimed at all healthcare settings and the other one to outpatients. It is important to emphasise that most of the tools agreed on the pharmacological groups that were likely to be deprescribed (statins, antipsychotics, proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants). Conclusion and relevance Knowing and being able to use DT aimed at hospitalised or multimorbidity patients could be very useful for hospital pharmacists, allowing them to carry out this activity as part of their healthcare activity. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance Deprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account the preferences of the patient, prognosis and the environment. This strategy acquires special relevance in elderly patients as they are exposed to numerous adverse effects and interactions. Aim and objectives To identify the deprescribing tools (DT) aimed at elderly patients available in the scientific literature and their main characteristics. Material and methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE for relevant literature published up to April 2020, applying the PRISMA method. The search strategy included terms for deprescribing, study population (aged OR elderly) and deprescribing strategies (tool OR process OR criteria OR algorithm). Inclusion criteria were: observational/experimental studies which created or developed a DT in elderly patients. Exclusion criteria were: studies where the DT was aimed at a specific medication, pharmacological group or pathology. Tools identified were analysed according to whether they were criterion/algorithm type. Results 13/485 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 11 tools were identified: 5 ‘algorithm based tools’ and 6 ‘criterion based tools’ (2 of the articles developed the validation of 2 criterion based tools). All tools were aimed at elderly patients, with peculiarities regarding their design, population, setting of application and items that formed the tool. Algorithm based tools The methodology used for its development was not specified. Population: two of them focused specifically on patients with limited life expectancy. Settings of application: two algorithms were applied to institutionalised patients, one to hospitalised patients and the remaining two did not specify the scenario. Criterion based tools Five used the Delphi method for their design and development. Population: one was focused on patients with multimorbidity or similar characteristics and two were aimed at patients with limited life expectancy. Settings of application: three tools were aimed at institutionalised patients, two other tools were aimed at all healthcare settings and the other one to outpatients. It is important to emphasise that most of the tools agreed on the pharmacological groups that were likely to be deprescribed (statins, antipsychotics, proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants). Conclusion and relevance Knowing and being able to use DT aimed at hospitalised or multimorbidity patients could be very useful for hospital pharmacists, allowing them to carry out this activity as part of their healthcare activity. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
6ER-036老年人处方工具:系统回顾
背景和重要性去处方是对治疗计划的修订,目的是简化它,考虑到患者的偏好,预后和环境。这种策略在老年患者中具有特殊的相关性,因为他们暴露于许多不良反应和相互作用中。目的和目的确定科学文献中针对老年患者的描述工具(DT)及其主要特征。材料与方法采用PRISMA方法在PubMed和EMBASE中系统检索截至2020年4月已发表的相关文献。搜索策略包括描述、研究人群(老年或老年)和描述策略(工具或过程或标准或算法)的术语。纳入标准为:在老年患者中产生或发展DT的观察性/实验性研究。排除标准为:DT针对特定药物、药理学组或病理的研究。根据确定的工具是否为标准/算法类型对其进行分析。结果13/485篇论文符合纳入标准,共鉴定出11种工具:5种“基于算法的工具”和6种“基于标准的工具”(其中2篇文章对2种基于标准的工具进行了验证)。所有工具都针对老年患者,在设计、人群、应用程序设置和构成工具的项目方面具有特殊性。基于算法的工具用于其开发的方法没有指定。人群:其中两个专门针对预期寿命有限的患者。应用设置:两种算法应用于机构患者,一种应用于住院患者,其余两种没有指定场景。基于标准的工具5使用德尔菲法进行设计和开发。人群:一组针对多病或相似特征的患者,两组针对预期寿命有限的患者。应用环境:三个工具针对住院患者,另外两个工具针对所有医疗保健环境,另一个针对门诊患者。重要的是要强调,大多数工具都同意可能被解除处方的药理学组(他汀类药物,抗精神病药物,质子泵抑制剂和抗抑郁药)。了解并能够使用针对住院或多病患者的DT对医院药剂师非常有用,使他们能够将此活动作为其医疗保健活动的一部分。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical service in the intensive care unit: a systematic review Assessment of particle contamination in vancomycin syringe pumps following fluid withdrawal using three diverse aseptic reconstitution techniques Comparative analysis of the prevalence 3-HIT concept in people living with HIV and seronegative patients with chronic conditions. Cross-3HIT Project. Adverse drug effect in the context of drug shortage: the CIRUPT prospective study from the French pharmacovigilance network Investigation of the hospital pharmacy profession in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1