Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Anxiety and Preoccupation about Sleep Questionnaire in clinical and non-clinical samples

IF 1 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep Science Pub Date : 2021-02-10 DOI:10.5935/1984-0063.20210033
Ö. Uygur, F. Orhan, H. Uygur, A. Kandeğer, Onur Hurşitoğlu
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Anxiety and Preoccupation about Sleep Questionnaire in clinical and non-clinical samples","authors":"Ö. Uygur, F. Orhan, H. Uygur, A. Kandeğer, Onur Hurşitoğlu","doi":"10.5935/1984-0063.20210033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Anxiety and preoccupation about sleep questionnaire (APSQ) in clinical and non-clinical samples. Material and Methods: Two samples (141 university students and 42 patients with major depressive disorders) completed Turkish APSQ, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), the insomnia severity index (ISI) and the sociodemographic data form. Content validity analysis was performed with the Davis technique after the translation process of the original scale. Explanatory factor analysis and principal component analysis were performed to determine the scales construct validity, and internal consistency and temporal stability analyses were conducted to evaluate its reliability. The PSQI and the insomnia severity index (ISI) were used to assess criterion- related validity. In addition, we divided all the participants into two groups as good-sleepers and clinical insomnia according to ISI scores. Predictive validity analyses were also computed via comparing groups. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale model aligns well with the original scales 10 items and two-factor structure. The scales and subdimensions Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were excellent (Factor 1; 0.935, factor 2; 0.906, total scale; 0.952). The test-retest correlations were 0.661 and 0.828 for depression group and university student group, respectively. Turkish APSQ scores were found to be significantly higher in both of the clinical groups (depression group vs. university student group, clinic insomnia group vs. good-sleepers group). Conclusion: The Turkish APSQ is adequate reliability and validity for assessing anxiety and preoccupation about sleep in Turkish clinical and non-clinical samples.","PeriodicalId":21848,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Science","volume":"36 1","pages":"68 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-0063.20210033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Anxiety and preoccupation about sleep questionnaire (APSQ) in clinical and non-clinical samples. Material and Methods: Two samples (141 university students and 42 patients with major depressive disorders) completed Turkish APSQ, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), the insomnia severity index (ISI) and the sociodemographic data form. Content validity analysis was performed with the Davis technique after the translation process of the original scale. Explanatory factor analysis and principal component analysis were performed to determine the scales construct validity, and internal consistency and temporal stability analyses were conducted to evaluate its reliability. The PSQI and the insomnia severity index (ISI) were used to assess criterion- related validity. In addition, we divided all the participants into two groups as good-sleepers and clinical insomnia according to ISI scores. Predictive validity analyses were also computed via comparing groups. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale model aligns well with the original scales 10 items and two-factor structure. The scales and subdimensions Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were excellent (Factor 1; 0.935, factor 2; 0.906, total scale; 0.952). The test-retest correlations were 0.661 and 0.828 for depression group and university student group, respectively. Turkish APSQ scores were found to be significantly higher in both of the clinical groups (depression group vs. university student group, clinic insomnia group vs. good-sleepers group). Conclusion: The Turkish APSQ is adequate reliability and validity for assessing anxiety and preoccupation about sleep in Turkish clinical and non-clinical samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其版睡眠焦虑和关注问卷在临床和非临床样本中的心理测量特性
目的研究土耳其版睡眠焦虑和关注问卷(APSQ)在临床和非临床样本中的心理测量特性。材料与方法2个样本(141名大学生和42名重度抑郁症患者)分别完成土耳其式APSQ、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、失眠严重程度指数(ISI)和社会人口学数据表。原量表翻译后采用Davis技术进行内容效度分析。采用解释因子分析和主成分分析确定量表的结构效度,采用内部一致性和时间稳定性分析评估量表的信度。使用PSQI和失眠严重程度指数(ISI)评估标准相关效度。此外,我们根据ISI得分将所有参与者分为睡眠良好组和临床失眠症组。通过比较组计算预测效度分析。结果验证性因子分析表明,量表模型与原量表10项及双因子结构吻合较好。量表和子维度Cronbach’s alpha系数均极好(因子1;0.935,因子2;0.906,总比例尺;0.952)。抑郁症组和大学生组的重测相关系数分别为0.661和0.828。土耳其人的APSQ得分在两个临床组(抑郁症组vs大学生组,临床失眠组vs睡眠良好组)中都明显更高。结论土耳其APSQ量表对土耳其临床和非临床样本的睡眠焦虑和关注有足够的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Science
Sleep Science CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
2024 Position Statement on the Use of Different Diagnostic Methods for Sleep Disorders in Adults - Brazilian Sleep Association. 2024 Standardization of Polysomnography Reports - A Consensus of the Brazilian Sleep Association. Association of Evening Eating with Sleep Quality and Insomnia among Adults in a Brazilian National Survey. Correction to: Can Improving Postoperative Sleep Speed Up Surgical Recovery?: Sleep Sci 2024; 17:3:335-338: São Paulo, September 20, 2024. Factors Related to the Sleep Duration of 3-Month-Old Infants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1