Faire vivre le common purpose organisationnel : application au cas des coopératives multisociétaires françaises

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Management International Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.59876/a-jstr-ww5q
Benjamin Dubrion, Jean-Yves Juban, Francesca Petrella
{"title":"Faire vivre le common purpose organisationnel : application au cas des coopératives multisociétaires françaises","authors":"Benjamin Dubrion, Jean-Yves Juban, Francesca Petrella","doi":"10.59876/a-jstr-ww5q","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"À la lumière du cadre théorique de Barnard (1938) centré sur le concept de common purpose, cet article analyse dans quelle mesure les coopératives multisociétaires (CMS) parviennent à réguler autour d’un projet commun les comportements d’une pluralité de parties prenantes. En nous appuyant sur l’étude de quatre CMS françaises, nous montrons que faire vivre le common purpose ne se décrète pas, mais se construit au fil du temps. Nos résultats questionnent la place des salariés dans les CMS et mettent en valeur l’apport de notre grille d’analyse relativement à la littérature existante sur la coopération dans les CMS.","PeriodicalId":51434,"journal":{"name":"Management International Review","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management International Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59876/a-jstr-ww5q","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

À la lumière du cadre théorique de Barnard (1938) centré sur le concept de common purpose, cet article analyse dans quelle mesure les coopératives multisociétaires (CMS) parviennent à réguler autour d’un projet commun les comportements d’une pluralité de parties prenantes. En nous appuyant sur l’étude de quatre CMS françaises, nous montrons que faire vivre le common purpose ne se décrète pas, mais se construit au fil du temps. Nos résultats questionnent la place des salariés dans les CMS et mettent en valeur l’apport de notre grille d’analyse relativement à la littérature existante sur la coopération dans les CMS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现组织的共同目标:以法国多成员合作社为例
本文以巴纳德(Barnard, 1938)的理论框架为基础,以共同目的的概念为中心,分析了多成员合作社(mcs)在多大程度上成功地围绕一个共同的项目规范了多个利益相关者的行为。基于对四个法国CMS的研究,我们表明,实现共同目标不是法令,而是随着时间的推移而建立的。我们的结果质疑了员工在CMS中的地位,并强调了我们的分析网格相对于现有的CMS合作文献的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Management International Review publishes research-based articles that reflect significant advances in the key areas of International Management. Its target audience consists of scholars in International Business Administration. Management International Review is a double-blind refereed journal that aims at the advancement and dissemination of research in the fields of International Management. The scope of the journal comprises International Business, Cross-Cultural Management, and Comparative Management. The journal publishes research that builds or extends International Management theory so that it can contribute to International Management practice. Management International Review welcomes both theoretical and empirical work. Original papers are invited that are based on a solid theoretical basis and a rigorous methodology. In the area of empirical studies, the journal publishes both quantitative and qualitative research. To be published in Management International Review, a paper must make strong contributions and highlight the significance of those contributions to the field of International Management. The editors are especially interested in manuscripts that break new ground rather than papers that make only incremental contributions. Management International Review publishes articles and research notes. Every year, six issues are published. On average, two of these issues are Focused Issues, which concentrate on a specific subfield of International Management.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Strategic Orientations on the Born Globals’ Export Performance: An Ambidexterity Approach Strangers in a Strange Land: Legitimacy Formation by Polish Multinationals Venturing into Sub-Saharan Africa Market or Community? An Institutional Logics Interpretation of how MNE Subsidiaries Respond to Mandated Social Innovation in India MNCs’ Corporate Social Innovation in Emerging Markets: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Boundary Conditions Social Innovation and the Financial Risk of EMNCs - The Contingent Role of Institutional Legitimacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1