Governance, Democracy and Inclusion in the Perspective of Nepal

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.3126/ajia.v1i1.44754
Parbat Kumar Rai
{"title":"Governance, Democracy and Inclusion in the Perspective of Nepal","authors":"Parbat Kumar Rai","doi":"10.3126/ajia.v1i1.44754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proportional representation is more effective in terms of inclusive governance. The constitution of Nepal, adopted in 2015, has largely implemented it. Quotas are reserved in different sector of the state. Despite this, various factions within Nepali society are still in movement in different form. There are two genuine questions in this context. Are the constitutional provisions appropriate? What are the challenges in the paths of inclusive governance? The objectives of this paper are to examine Nepal’s existing practices of inclusion in the governing process, and the challenges of inclusive democracy from a Nepali perspective. The descriptive research design was adopted in this paper. Secondary sources were used to acquire the information. In addition, the KSL comprehensive guideline was followed to prepare this paper. The conclusion of this paper is that the country faces numerous challenges in implementing inclusive governance, like the movement of concerning republicanism, secularism, federalism and inclusion. Nevertheless, federalism, republicanism, secularism and inclusions are crucial requirements for sustainable peace. Obviously, the PR model of representation in each state organ ensures that all sections are represented.","PeriodicalId":42502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ajia.v1i1.44754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proportional representation is more effective in terms of inclusive governance. The constitution of Nepal, adopted in 2015, has largely implemented it. Quotas are reserved in different sector of the state. Despite this, various factions within Nepali society are still in movement in different form. There are two genuine questions in this context. Are the constitutional provisions appropriate? What are the challenges in the paths of inclusive governance? The objectives of this paper are to examine Nepal’s existing practices of inclusion in the governing process, and the challenges of inclusive democracy from a Nepali perspective. The descriptive research design was adopted in this paper. Secondary sources were used to acquire the information. In addition, the KSL comprehensive guideline was followed to prepare this paper. The conclusion of this paper is that the country faces numerous challenges in implementing inclusive governance, like the movement of concerning republicanism, secularism, federalism and inclusion. Nevertheless, federalism, republicanism, secularism and inclusions are crucial requirements for sustainable peace. Obviously, the PR model of representation in each state organ ensures that all sections are represented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔视角下的治理、民主和包容
比例代表制在包容性治理方面更为有效。2015年通过的尼泊尔宪法在很大程度上执行了这一规定。配额在国家的不同部门是保留的。尽管如此,尼泊尔社会内部的各种派别仍在以不同的形式运动。在这种情况下,有两个真正的问题。宪法规定是否恰当?包容性治理道路上的挑战是什么?本文的目的是从尼泊尔的角度审视尼泊尔在治理过程中包容的现有做法,以及包容性民主的挑战。本文采用描述性研究设计。二手资料被用来获取信息。此外,本文还遵循了KSL综合指南。本文的结论是,该国在实施包容性治理方面面临着许多挑战,如有关共和主义,世俗主义,联邦制和包容性的运动。然而,联邦制、共和主义、世俗主义和包容是可持续和平的关键要求。显然,每个国家机关的代表权的PR模式确保了所有阶层的代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Book review: Malti Goel, Science Diplomacy for South Asian Countries: Insights and Breakthroughs Book review: Börje Ljunggren and Dwight H. Perkins (Eds), Vietnam: Navigating a Rapidly Changing Economy, Society and Political Order Book review: Rajesh Basrur, Subcontinental Drift: Domestic Politics and India’s Foreign Policy Book review: Michael A. McDevitt, China as a Twenty-first-century Naval Power: Theory, Practice, and Implications Book review: Sumantra Bose, Kashmir at the Crossroads: Inside India’s 21st-Century Conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1