Classification in Brief: The Spinal Deformity Study Group Classification of Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis.

G. C. Camino Willhuber, G. Kido
{"title":"Classification in Brief: The Spinal Deformity Study Group Classification of Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis.","authors":"G. C. Camino Willhuber, G. Kido","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000001005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spondylolisthesis is characterized by vertebral slippage from a variety of causes, including degenerative changes, trauma, tumors or congenital dysplasia. Isthmic spondylolisthesis is an acquired condition that results from a pars interarticularis disruption usually at the L5 vertebra that exhibits a similar male:female distribution. The most common symptoms are low back pain and unilateral or bilateral leg pain caused by L5 radiculopathy, depending on severity. The first classification of spondylolisthesis was developed by Meyerding [14] in 1932, who described four types depending on the degree of slippage between two vertebral bodies. In that classification, Grade I involved a slip of 0% to 25%, Grade II was defined as 25% to 50%, Grade III as 50% to 75%, and Grade IV as 75% to 100%. Later, a Grade V was added with a slip greater than 100% slippage (a condition called spondyloptosis). In 1976, Wiltse et al. [17] described a classification based on etiological and anatomical factors with 5 types: I-dysplastic (congenital); II-isthmic (described as a pars lysis (type IIA), a pars elongation (type IIB) or an acute pars fracture (type IIC); III-degenerative; IV-traumatic and V-neoplastic conditions. This system was useful in terms of etiology. Marchetti and Bartolozzi [13] distinguished between developmental and acquired forms of spondylolisthesis and divided developmental spondylolisthesis into two major types, highand low-dysplastic, depending on the severity of bony dysplastic changes of the lumbosacral region and the risk of further slippage. The high-dysplastic type is mainly associated with substantial lumbosacral kyphosis, a trapezoidal L5 vertebra, dysplastic posterior elements of L5 and S1, and an anomaly of the upper endplate of S1. By contrast, the low-dysplastic type corresponds to minimal lumbosacral kyphosis, almost rectangular L5 vertebra, minimal sacral doming and relatively normal transverse processes. Although they introduced the concept of low and high dysplasia in the classification, they did not provide strict criteria on how to differentiate between these two subtypes. Many studies demonstrated the importance of global and spinopelvic balance, mainly assessed through radiographic measurements such as pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, sagittal vertical axis, and lumbar lordosis in the evaluation and progression of spondylolisthesis [2, 4, 7]. The relationship between pelvic and global balance and spondylolisthesis progression has garnered more interest recently. Glassman et al. [3] and Mac-Thiong et al. [12] demonstrated a direct relationship between sagittal balance and health-related quality of life in patients with spinal deformity. In addition, the relationship between pelvic and global balance with spondylolisthesis progression has garnered more interest recently [5]. For this reason, the Spinal Deformity Study Group developed a classification system that consists of six types of progressive lumbosacral spondylolisthesis based on radiographic parameters such as pelvic incidence, slip grade, and sacropelvic and spinal balance, and proposed a therapeutic guide for the management of these different types depending on spondylolisthesis severity. Each author certifies that neither he, nor any member of his immediate family, has funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Each author certifies that his institution waived approval for the reporting of this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.","PeriodicalId":10465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Spondylolisthesis is characterized by vertebral slippage from a variety of causes, including degenerative changes, trauma, tumors or congenital dysplasia. Isthmic spondylolisthesis is an acquired condition that results from a pars interarticularis disruption usually at the L5 vertebra that exhibits a similar male:female distribution. The most common symptoms are low back pain and unilateral or bilateral leg pain caused by L5 radiculopathy, depending on severity. The first classification of spondylolisthesis was developed by Meyerding [14] in 1932, who described four types depending on the degree of slippage between two vertebral bodies. In that classification, Grade I involved a slip of 0% to 25%, Grade II was defined as 25% to 50%, Grade III as 50% to 75%, and Grade IV as 75% to 100%. Later, a Grade V was added with a slip greater than 100% slippage (a condition called spondyloptosis). In 1976, Wiltse et al. [17] described a classification based on etiological and anatomical factors with 5 types: I-dysplastic (congenital); II-isthmic (described as a pars lysis (type IIA), a pars elongation (type IIB) or an acute pars fracture (type IIC); III-degenerative; IV-traumatic and V-neoplastic conditions. This system was useful in terms of etiology. Marchetti and Bartolozzi [13] distinguished between developmental and acquired forms of spondylolisthesis and divided developmental spondylolisthesis into two major types, highand low-dysplastic, depending on the severity of bony dysplastic changes of the lumbosacral region and the risk of further slippage. The high-dysplastic type is mainly associated with substantial lumbosacral kyphosis, a trapezoidal L5 vertebra, dysplastic posterior elements of L5 and S1, and an anomaly of the upper endplate of S1. By contrast, the low-dysplastic type corresponds to minimal lumbosacral kyphosis, almost rectangular L5 vertebra, minimal sacral doming and relatively normal transverse processes. Although they introduced the concept of low and high dysplasia in the classification, they did not provide strict criteria on how to differentiate between these two subtypes. Many studies demonstrated the importance of global and spinopelvic balance, mainly assessed through radiographic measurements such as pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, sagittal vertical axis, and lumbar lordosis in the evaluation and progression of spondylolisthesis [2, 4, 7]. The relationship between pelvic and global balance and spondylolisthesis progression has garnered more interest recently. Glassman et al. [3] and Mac-Thiong et al. [12] demonstrated a direct relationship between sagittal balance and health-related quality of life in patients with spinal deformity. In addition, the relationship between pelvic and global balance with spondylolisthesis progression has garnered more interest recently [5]. For this reason, the Spinal Deformity Study Group developed a classification system that consists of six types of progressive lumbosacral spondylolisthesis based on radiographic parameters such as pelvic incidence, slip grade, and sacropelvic and spinal balance, and proposed a therapeutic guide for the management of these different types depending on spondylolisthesis severity. Each author certifies that neither he, nor any member of his immediate family, has funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Each author certifies that his institution waived approval for the reporting of this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分类简介:脊柱畸形研究组腰骶椎滑脱的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CORR Insights®: What is the Geographic Distribution of Women Orthopaedic Surgeons Throughout the United States? What Are the Rates and Trends of Women Authors in Three High-Impact Orthopaedic Journals from 2006-2017? CORR Insights®: Chair Versus Chairman: Does Orthopaedics Use the Gendered Term More Than Other Specialties? CORR Insights®: Does the Proportion of Women in Orthopaedic Leadership Roles Reflect the Gender Composition of Specialty Societies? Women Are at Higher Risk for Concussions Due to Ball or Equipment Contact in Soccer and Lacrosse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1