The trajectory of repairs in the defibrillator sequence during emergency cardiac arrest calls – Balancing progressivity and intersubjectivity

Q4 Medicine Communication and Medicine Pub Date : 2022-02-17 DOI:10.1558/cam.19263
Nirukshi Perera, M. Riou, S. Ball, Tanya Birnie, A. Morgan, A. Whiteside, J. Bray, P. Bailey, J. Finn
{"title":"The trajectory of repairs in the defibrillator sequence during emergency cardiac arrest calls – Balancing progressivity and intersubjectivity","authors":"Nirukshi Perera, M. Riou, S. Ball, Tanya Birnie, A. Morgan, A. Whiteside, J. Bray, P. Bailey, J. Finn","doi":"10.1558/cam.19263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the urgent, time-sensitive nature of interactions in emergency ambulance phone calls, dealing with repairs (communication trouble) can be challenging. We investigate a critical medical emergency known as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and focus on how ambulance call-takers handle repairs during an interactive sequence concerning the retrieval of automatic external defibrillators (AED). Clear communication about AEDs is vital, because the device can deliver a life-saving shock to an OHCA patient’s heart. We examined repair initiations, and their subsequent trajectories, during the defibrillator sequences in 58 OHCA emergency calls. We found evidence of competing influences in resolving such repairs: (1) providing a repair solution (including ensuring caller comprehension of what a defibrillator is) to achieve intersubjectivity that could resolve the question of defibrillator availability; or (2) progressing the call as swiftly as possible to an immediately applicable life-saving intervention such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The findings suggest that in certain institutional contexts, such as emergency medical service dispatch, the resolution of repairs in communication can take varying trajectories in order to achieve the most feasible goal in immediate time. We suggest that emergency medical services consider these trajectories in helping ambulance call-takers anticipate repairs in OHCA calls.","PeriodicalId":39728,"journal":{"name":"Communication and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.19263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Due to the urgent, time-sensitive nature of interactions in emergency ambulance phone calls, dealing with repairs (communication trouble) can be challenging. We investigate a critical medical emergency known as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and focus on how ambulance call-takers handle repairs during an interactive sequence concerning the retrieval of automatic external defibrillators (AED). Clear communication about AEDs is vital, because the device can deliver a life-saving shock to an OHCA patient’s heart. We examined repair initiations, and their subsequent trajectories, during the defibrillator sequences in 58 OHCA emergency calls. We found evidence of competing influences in resolving such repairs: (1) providing a repair solution (including ensuring caller comprehension of what a defibrillator is) to achieve intersubjectivity that could resolve the question of defibrillator availability; or (2) progressing the call as swiftly as possible to an immediately applicable life-saving intervention such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The findings suggest that in certain institutional contexts, such as emergency medical service dispatch, the resolution of repairs in communication can take varying trajectories in order to achieve the most feasible goal in immediate time. We suggest that emergency medical services consider these trajectories in helping ambulance call-takers anticipate repairs in OHCA calls.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧急心脏骤停期间除颤器序列的修复轨迹——平衡进行性和主体间性
由于紧急救护电话的紧急和时间敏感性,处理维修(通信问题)可能具有挑战性。我们调查了一种称为院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的严重医疗紧急情况,并重点关注救护车呼叫人员如何在检索自动体外除颤器(AED)的交互序列中处理维修。关于aed的清晰沟通是至关重要的,因为该设备可以给OHCA患者的心脏带来救命的冲击。我们研究了58例OHCA紧急呼叫中除颤器序列中的修复启动及其后续轨迹。我们发现了解决此类维修问题的竞争影响的证据:(1)提供维修解决方案(包括确保呼叫者理解除颤器是什么),以实现可以解决除颤器可用性问题的主体间性;或者(2)尽快将呼叫进展到立即适用的挽救生命的干预措施,如心肺复苏。研究结果表明,在某些机构背景下,如紧急医疗服务调度,解决通信维修问题可以采取不同的轨迹,以便在最短时间内实现最可行的目标。我们建议紧急医疗服务考虑这些轨迹,以帮助救护车呼叫者在OHCA呼叫中预测维修。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communication and Medicine
Communication and Medicine Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Communication & Medicine continues to abide by the following distinctive aims: • To consolidate different traditions of discourse and communication research in its commitment to an understanding of psychosocial, cultural and ethical aspects of healthcare in contemporary societies. • To cover the different specialities within medicine and allied healthcare studies. • To underscore the significance of specific areas and themes by bringing out special issues from time to time. • To be fully committed to publishing evidence-based, data-driven original studies with practical application and relevance as key guiding principles.
期刊最新文献
‘But this is a wizardry something that has to be removed first’ Implications of HIV status disclosure Team talk and the evaluation of medical guidance documentation Tensions between institutional and professional frames in team talk in gerontological social work Communication skills, expertise and ethics in healthcare education and practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1