Designing argumentative metrics for online consultation portals in Brazil

Fabro Steibel, Elsa Estevez
{"title":"Designing argumentative metrics for online consultation portals in Brazil","authors":"Fabro Steibel, Elsa Estevez","doi":"10.1145/2307729.2307781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Web 2.0 technologies allow a massive number of people to talk to government and governments increasingly want to hear from public. However, the available technology and automated tools enabling policy makers to make sense of large-scale data shared online are limited. This paper presents a research project called Supporting Collaborative Deliberation: Designing Consultation Portals for Deliberative Practices in Brazil (SCD-Brazil). The project aims at investigating how governments can make sense of large scale number of policy inputs received from citizens with the aid of online consultations forums. Based on the analysis of four government-run online consultation forums from Brazil, this research explores the use of technology in visualizing large-scale argumentation data for policy purposes, suggesting challenges and opportunities in promoting Internet-based policy forums to mediate how government and citizens make sense of democracy.","PeriodicalId":93488,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Digital Government Research. International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Digital Government Research. International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2307729.2307781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Web 2.0 technologies allow a massive number of people to talk to government and governments increasingly want to hear from public. However, the available technology and automated tools enabling policy makers to make sense of large-scale data shared online are limited. This paper presents a research project called Supporting Collaborative Deliberation: Designing Consultation Portals for Deliberative Practices in Brazil (SCD-Brazil). The project aims at investigating how governments can make sense of large scale number of policy inputs received from citizens with the aid of online consultations forums. Based on the analysis of four government-run online consultation forums from Brazil, this research explores the use of technology in visualizing large-scale argumentation data for policy purposes, suggesting challenges and opportunities in promoting Internet-based policy forums to mediate how government and citizens make sense of democracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为巴西的在线咨询门户网站设计论证指标
Web 2.0技术允许大量的人与政府对话,政府也越来越希望听到公众的声音。然而,使政策制定者能够理解在线共享的大规模数据的现有技术和自动化工具是有限的。本文提出了一个名为“支持协作审议:为巴西审议实践设计咨询门户”(SCD-Brazil)的研究项目。该项目旨在调查政府如何在在线咨询论坛的帮助下理解从公民那里收到的大量政策投入。基于对巴西四个政府运营的在线咨询论坛的分析,本研究探讨了技术在为政策目的可视化大规模论证数据中的应用,提出了促进基于互联网的政策论坛调解政府和公民如何理解民主的挑战和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Misinformation Threat: A Techno-Governance Approach for Curbing the Fake News of Tomorrow Book Review: Recoding America- Why Government is Failing in the Digital Age and How we can Do Better Challenges in AI-supported process analysis in the Italian judicial system: what after digitalization? PLUS: A Semi-automated Pipeline for Fraud Detection in Public Bids How Does the Citizen's Education Level Affect Their Internet Rights Protection Willingness? ——The Parallel Intermediary Effect of Digital Information Acquisition Ability and Utilization Ability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1