Sustainability Assurance and Evaluation for Effective Corporate Social Responsibility Communication

E. Uwem
{"title":"Sustainability Assurance and Evaluation for Effective Corporate Social Responsibility Communication","authors":"E. Uwem","doi":"10.2118/198776-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over the years, oil and gas companies in Nigeria have adopted several policy approaches to corporate social responsibility (CSR) to complement their stakeholder relations strategy. These include corporate philanthropy, strategic CSR as well as partnership schemes. Some companies have also gone further to demonstrate significant commitment and interest for CSR delivery by increasing their expenditure on CSR. To derive maximum value, companies need to report with certainty, the direct and indirect impact of their contributions to sustainable development. Yet, there are challenges in determining the actual impact and outcomes of CSR initiatives, and reporting same to internal and external stakeholders, without greenwashing. Many CSR projects have been known to fail shortly after completion and handing over to beneficiaries. This is partly due to initial failure to incorporate a robust set of sustainability criteria into the design and implementation process. On the other hand, attempts to measure project impacts after completion sometimes do not yield the desired results for effective CSR communication due to deployment of poorly designed methodology for data collection and analysis. This paper provides guidance on sustainability assurance and evaluation criteria which can assist companies to move beyond the annual reporting on the number of completed projects and amount of money spent (i.e. quantity delivered), to telling the story of the impact of projects on beneficiaries as well as the macroeconomic, social and environmental effects (i.e. quality and value-added). The paper concludes that the knowledge and full understanding of the impacts and effects of completed community development projects are crucial inputs for effective CSR communication as well as lessons for the planning and delivery of subsequent projects.","PeriodicalId":11250,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198776-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the years, oil and gas companies in Nigeria have adopted several policy approaches to corporate social responsibility (CSR) to complement their stakeholder relations strategy. These include corporate philanthropy, strategic CSR as well as partnership schemes. Some companies have also gone further to demonstrate significant commitment and interest for CSR delivery by increasing their expenditure on CSR. To derive maximum value, companies need to report with certainty, the direct and indirect impact of their contributions to sustainable development. Yet, there are challenges in determining the actual impact and outcomes of CSR initiatives, and reporting same to internal and external stakeholders, without greenwashing. Many CSR projects have been known to fail shortly after completion and handing over to beneficiaries. This is partly due to initial failure to incorporate a robust set of sustainability criteria into the design and implementation process. On the other hand, attempts to measure project impacts after completion sometimes do not yield the desired results for effective CSR communication due to deployment of poorly designed methodology for data collection and analysis. This paper provides guidance on sustainability assurance and evaluation criteria which can assist companies to move beyond the annual reporting on the number of completed projects and amount of money spent (i.e. quantity delivered), to telling the story of the impact of projects on beneficiaries as well as the macroeconomic, social and environmental effects (i.e. quality and value-added). The paper concludes that the knowledge and full understanding of the impacts and effects of completed community development projects are crucial inputs for effective CSR communication as well as lessons for the planning and delivery of subsequent projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有效企业社会责任沟通的可持续性保证与评估
多年来,尼日利亚的石油和天然气公司采用了几种企业社会责任(CSR)政策方法,以补充其利益相关者关系战略。其中包括企业慈善事业、战略性企业社会责任以及伙伴关系计划。一些公司还通过增加企业社会责任支出,进一步表现出对履行企业社会责任的重大承诺和兴趣。为了获得最大的价值,公司需要确定地报告它们对可持续发展的贡献的直接和间接影响。然而,在确定企业社会责任计划的实际影响和结果,并向内部和外部利益相关者报告这些方面存在挑战,同时不洗绿。众所周知,许多企业社会责任项目在完成并移交给受益人后不久就失败了。部分原因是最初未能将一套强有力的可持续性标准纳入设计和实施过程。另一方面,由于数据收集和分析的方法设计不佳,在项目完成后测量项目影响的尝试有时无法产生有效的企业社会责任沟通所需的结果。本文提供了关于可持续性保证和评价标准的指导,可以帮助公司超越对已完成项目数量和花费金额(即交付数量)的年度报告,讲述项目对受益人的影响以及宏观经济,社会和环境影响(即质量和增值)的故事。本文的结论是,对已完成的社区发展项目的影响和效果的认识和充分理解是有效的企业社会责任沟通的关键投入,也是后续项目规划和交付的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Macroeconomic, Sectoral and Distributional Impact of Gas Monetization Policy in Nigeria: A CGE Application Occupational deaths from Similar Causes; Why? Production Restoration Through Innovative Sourcing of Lift Gas - Jacket X Case Study Experimental Investigation of the Macroscopic Displacement Efficiency of Locally Sourced Locust Bean Gum and Gum Arabic The Effect of Monovalent and Divalent Ions on Biodegradable Polymers in Enhanced Oil Recovery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1