Online better for revision and offline better for motivation? - perspectives of online learning in undergraduate medical students in India

G. Kansara, Gaurang K Anandpara, Ashishkumar M. Agravatt, Richa Modi, A. Modi
{"title":"Online better for revision and offline better for motivation? - perspectives of online learning in undergraduate medical students in India","authors":"G. Kansara, Gaurang K Anandpara, Ashishkumar M. Agravatt, Richa Modi, A. Modi","doi":"10.5455/njppp.2023.13.02071202313022023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced many institutions to unexpectedly adopt online learning methods to teach their students. As students’ perspectives are vital to be understood to determine whether any teaching learning method is optimum for implementation, we conducted a questionnaire-based study of students of a medical college. Aims and Objectives: The objective of this research study was to gain a better understanding of problems concerned with online learning methods. Materials and Methods: Undergraduate 1st year medical students of four different medical colleges of India were the participants. After ethical committee permission, responses were invited for a Google form’s questionnaire. Students were asked in detail about their choices. Results: Most students preferred the offline mode of study over the online mode. Majority of students preferred to keep their own camera off during online lectures. Biochemistry subject was considered comparatively easier and Anatomy was considered difficult to learn in online mode compared to offline mode. Few students felt comfortable with online learning of more than 5 h daily. Concentration in classes was difficult, deemed more difficult for online classes and majority of students felt a lack of motivation in online learning. Conclusions: Institutes using the online mode of learning need to address student’s problems before they mandate certain rules like keeping students’ videos on. Lack of motivation and screen fatigue are common problems among students which needs to be addressed by counseling or mentoring if necessary. Subject specific preferences of students need to be taken care of.","PeriodicalId":18969,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2023.13.02071202313022023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced many institutions to unexpectedly adopt online learning methods to teach their students. As students’ perspectives are vital to be understood to determine whether any teaching learning method is optimum for implementation, we conducted a questionnaire-based study of students of a medical college. Aims and Objectives: The objective of this research study was to gain a better understanding of problems concerned with online learning methods. Materials and Methods: Undergraduate 1st year medical students of four different medical colleges of India were the participants. After ethical committee permission, responses were invited for a Google form’s questionnaire. Students were asked in detail about their choices. Results: Most students preferred the offline mode of study over the online mode. Majority of students preferred to keep their own camera off during online lectures. Biochemistry subject was considered comparatively easier and Anatomy was considered difficult to learn in online mode compared to offline mode. Few students felt comfortable with online learning of more than 5 h daily. Concentration in classes was difficult, deemed more difficult for online classes and majority of students felt a lack of motivation in online learning. Conclusions: Institutes using the online mode of learning need to address student’s problems before they mandate certain rules like keeping students’ videos on. Lack of motivation and screen fatigue are common problems among students which needs to be addressed by counseling or mentoring if necessary. Subject specific preferences of students need to be taken care of.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线更有利于复习,离线更有利于激励?——对印度医科本科生在线学习的看法
背景:新冠肺炎疫情迫使许多机构出人意料地采用在线学习方式对学生进行教学。由于学生的观点对于确定任何教学方法是否最适合实施至关重要,我们对一所医学院的学生进行了一项基于问卷的研究。目的和目的:本研究的目的是为了更好地了解与在线学习方法有关的问题。材料与方法:以印度四所不同医学院的本科一年级医学生为研究对象。在获得伦理委员会的许可后,我们邀请参与者填写一份谷歌表格的问卷。学生们被详细询问了他们的选择。结果:与在线学习模式相比,大多数学生更喜欢离线学习模式。大多数学生喜欢在网上上课时关掉自己的摄像头。与离线模式相比,在线模式下生物化学科目相对容易,解剖学科目相对难学。很少有学生能适应每天5小时以上的在线学习。在课堂上集中注意力是困难的,在线课程被认为更困难,大多数学生感到在线学习缺乏动力。结论:使用在线学习模式的学院需要先解决学生的问题,然后再强制规定某些规则,比如保留学生的视频。缺乏动力和屏幕疲劳是学生中常见的问题,需要在必要时通过咨询或指导来解决。学生的学科偏好需要得到照顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Substance abuse: A survey among medical students of tribal area of Chhattisgarh – A cross-sectional study Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance among 2nd-year medical students: A cross-sectional study Evaluation of ethanolic extract of leaves of Abutilon indicum on carrageenan-induced rat paw edema Students’ reflection on immediate feedback during formative assessment Randomized and controlled trial to determine safety and efficacy of Foley’s catheter and PGE2 gel for induction of labor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1