An exploratory study on the construction of networks in social farming

Q2 Social Sciences Economia Agro-Alimentare Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.3280/ecag2019-002015
P. Borsotto, Marco Gaito, A. Papaleo, C. D. Vivo, Michela Ascani, G. Ricciardi, G. Guccione
{"title":"An exploratory study on the construction of networks in social farming","authors":"P. Borsotto, Marco Gaito, A. Papaleo, C. D. Vivo, Michela Ascani, G. Ricciardi, G. Guccione","doi":"10.3280/ecag2019-002015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social farming is a complex activity that requires, for its development, the contribution of different skills and competences and, therefore, the creation of networks and complex relationships among several actors. According to the Report on Social Farming (RRN, 2017), networks that are built around social agriculture are complex both in terms of agreements and of the plurality of stakeholders involved. The paper aims at presenting the results of the research activity carried out on a group of Italian social farming operators that participated in information and training activities organized by the Italian National Rural Network (NRN) (summer schools and/or study visits) between 2016 and 2018. Aim of the research is to understand the relationships that have been created after participating in these moments and how much these activities improved the strengthening or the creation of territorial networks. The survey was conducted with qualitative methods and the tools used are the interview by questionnaire and social network analysis. All participants at the end of the events were invited to respond to a questionnaire aimed at identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the activity and subsequently they were given a questionnaire with CAWI methodology aimed at understanding the social farming activities developed after the training. Then a sample of respondents was selected, among those who actually started new projects or implemented the existing ones. At this stage, data were gathered from an in-depth questionnaire and direct interview., Through the application of Social Network Analysis (SNA) the formal and informal links between the participants have been mapped and described. The analysis of the actors has highlighted the high heterogeneity of the subjects involved, which in the majority of cases is constituted by farmers. The network is not very cohesive due to the lack of links between many actors. However, it is an active and inclusive network characterized by redundant links that may be poorly efficient and an obstacle to its further expansion. In particular, within the network, there are actors who simultaneously hold multiple roles representing multiple interests; the NRN no longer appears as a stand-alone unit that only performs an “institutional function” but as a social subject.","PeriodicalId":37333,"journal":{"name":"Economia Agro-Alimentare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economia Agro-Alimentare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2019-002015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social farming is a complex activity that requires, for its development, the contribution of different skills and competences and, therefore, the creation of networks and complex relationships among several actors. According to the Report on Social Farming (RRN, 2017), networks that are built around social agriculture are complex both in terms of agreements and of the plurality of stakeholders involved. The paper aims at presenting the results of the research activity carried out on a group of Italian social farming operators that participated in information and training activities organized by the Italian National Rural Network (NRN) (summer schools and/or study visits) between 2016 and 2018. Aim of the research is to understand the relationships that have been created after participating in these moments and how much these activities improved the strengthening or the creation of territorial networks. The survey was conducted with qualitative methods and the tools used are the interview by questionnaire and social network analysis. All participants at the end of the events were invited to respond to a questionnaire aimed at identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the activity and subsequently they were given a questionnaire with CAWI methodology aimed at understanding the social farming activities developed after the training. Then a sample of respondents was selected, among those who actually started new projects or implemented the existing ones. At this stage, data were gathered from an in-depth questionnaire and direct interview., Through the application of Social Network Analysis (SNA) the formal and informal links between the participants have been mapped and described. The analysis of the actors has highlighted the high heterogeneity of the subjects involved, which in the majority of cases is constituted by farmers. The network is not very cohesive due to the lack of links between many actors. However, it is an active and inclusive network characterized by redundant links that may be poorly efficient and an obstacle to its further expansion. In particular, within the network, there are actors who simultaneously hold multiple roles representing multiple interests; the NRN no longer appears as a stand-alone unit that only performs an “institutional function” but as a social subject.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会农业网络建设的探索性研究
社会农业是一项复杂的活动,它的发展需要不同技能和能力的贡献,因此需要在几个行动者之间建立网络和复杂的关系。根据社会农业报告(RRN, 2017),围绕社会农业建立的网络在协议和涉及的利益相关者的多样性方面都是复杂的。本文旨在介绍2016年至2018年期间参加意大利国家农村网络(NRN)组织的信息和培训活动(暑期学校和/或考察访问)的一组意大利社会农业经营者开展的研究活动的结果。这项研究的目的是了解参与这些时刻后所建立的关系,以及这些活动在多大程度上促进了领土网络的加强或建立。本调查采用定性方法,使用的工具是问卷访谈法和社会网络分析法。在活动结束时,所有参与者都被邀请回答一份问卷,旨在确定活动的优势和劣势,随后他们获得了一份采用CAWI方法的问卷,旨在了解培训后发展的社会农业活动。然后,从那些实际启动新项目或实施现有项目的受访者中选择了一些样本。在这一阶段,通过深度问卷调查和直接访谈收集数据。通过社会网络分析(SNA)的应用,绘制和描述了参与者之间的正式和非正式联系。对行为者的分析突出了所涉及的主体的高度异质性,在大多数情况下是由农民构成的。由于许多参与者之间缺乏联系,网络的凝聚力不强。然而,它是一个积极和包容的网络,其特点是冗余的环节可能效率低下,并阻碍其进一步扩大。特别是,在网络中,行动者同时扮演代表多种利益的多重角色;NRN不再是一个只执行“机构功能”的独立单位,而是一个社会主体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economia Agro-Alimentare
Economia Agro-Alimentare Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Economia agro-alimentare/Food Economy is a triannual peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Franco Angeli Edizioni on behalf of the Italian Society of Agri-food Economics (SIEA), founded in 1996 by the then President of SIEA Fausto Cantarelli. It offers an international forum for the discussion and analysis of mono and interdisciplinary socio-economic, political, legal and technical issues, related to agricultural and food systems. It welcomes submissions of original papers focusing on agriculture, food, natural resources, safety, nutrition and health, including all processes and infrastructure involved in providing food to populations; as well as the processes, inputs and outputs involved in consumption and disposal of food and food-related items. Analyses also include social, political, economic and environmental contexts and human resource challenges. Submissions should be addressed to an international audience of researchers, practitioners, and policy makers, and they may consider local, national, or global scales.
期刊最新文献
Advisors and inspectors for the development of organic agriculture in Italy Access to Technology to Increase Food Resilience in Rural Households in Indonesia What happened to the subjects? Questions about mezcal Determinants of Agri-food Investment from Fund Managers' Viewpoint Unearthing Unique Value: Exploring the Potential of Protected Designation of Origin on the Tangerine Industry of Patate, Tungurahua
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1