Power and freedom: Reflecting on the relationship

Q1 Arts and Humanities Koers Pub Date : 2021-06-09 DOI:10.19108/KOERS.86.1.2472
J. Zaaiman
{"title":"Power and freedom: Reflecting on the relationship","authors":"J. Zaaiman","doi":"10.19108/KOERS.86.1.2472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contributes to the debate on the relationship between power and freedom. Freedom is currently a burning issue in political discourses. It is therefore important to evaluate the relationship between these two important concepts and present a basis for further critique and cognition about this relationship. The article briefly evaluates certain philosophical perspectives in this regard; particularly the theoretical contributions of Oppenheim, Pettit, Kristjánsson and Morriss. By reflecting on these perspectives it is concluded that human beings’ rational capacities present them with the opportunity to imagine freedom. However the option of freedom to choose one’s own preferences is constrained by a social contract that guarantees and limits freedom. In contrast, power could interfere with freedom by eliminating specific actions or frustrating others from choosing actions or by not suppressing obstacles in this regard. The protection of freedom lies therefore in continuous negotiation, open dialogue and struggle for it. \nKey concepts: Power; freedom; definition; concept; liberalism; unfreedom\n\nOpsomming \nMag en invloed: Besinning oor die verhouding\nHierdie artikel dra by tot die debat oor die verhouding tussen mag en vryheid. Vryheid is tans ‘n brandende saak in politieke diskoerse. Dit is dus belangrik om die verhouding tussen hierdie twee belangrike konsepte te evalueer en ‘n basis te bied vir verdere kritiek en nadenke oor hierdie verhouding. Die artikel evalueer kortliks enkele filosofiese perspektiewe in hierdie verband, en spesifiek die teoretiese bydraes van Oppenheim, Pettit, Kristjánsson en Morriss. In ‘n besinning oor hierdie perspektiewe word die gevolgtrekking gemaak dat mense se rasionele vermoëns hulle kans gee om vryheid te verbeeld. Hierdie opsie van vryheid om eie voorkeure te kies, word egter beperk deur ‘n sosiale kontrak wat vryheid waarborg maar ook beperk. In teenstelling hiermee sou mag wel vryheid kon belemmer deur spesifieke aksies uit te skakel of mense se keuses vir spesifieke aksies te frustreer, of deur nie hindernisse in hierdie verband te onderdruk nie. Die beskerming van vryheid setel dus in voortdurende onderhandeling, oop dialoog en die stryd daarom.\nKernbegrippe: Mag; vryheid; definisie; konsep; liberalisme; onvryheid.","PeriodicalId":38057,"journal":{"name":"Koers","volume":"08 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.86.1.2472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article contributes to the debate on the relationship between power and freedom. Freedom is currently a burning issue in political discourses. It is therefore important to evaluate the relationship between these two important concepts and present a basis for further critique and cognition about this relationship. The article briefly evaluates certain philosophical perspectives in this regard; particularly the theoretical contributions of Oppenheim, Pettit, Kristjánsson and Morriss. By reflecting on these perspectives it is concluded that human beings’ rational capacities present them with the opportunity to imagine freedom. However the option of freedom to choose one’s own preferences is constrained by a social contract that guarantees and limits freedom. In contrast, power could interfere with freedom by eliminating specific actions or frustrating others from choosing actions or by not suppressing obstacles in this regard. The protection of freedom lies therefore in continuous negotiation, open dialogue and struggle for it. Key concepts: Power; freedom; definition; concept; liberalism; unfreedom Opsomming Mag en invloed: Besinning oor die verhouding Hierdie artikel dra by tot die debat oor die verhouding tussen mag en vryheid. Vryheid is tans ‘n brandende saak in politieke diskoerse. Dit is dus belangrik om die verhouding tussen hierdie twee belangrike konsepte te evalueer en ‘n basis te bied vir verdere kritiek en nadenke oor hierdie verhouding. Die artikel evalueer kortliks enkele filosofiese perspektiewe in hierdie verband, en spesifiek die teoretiese bydraes van Oppenheim, Pettit, Kristjánsson en Morriss. In ‘n besinning oor hierdie perspektiewe word die gevolgtrekking gemaak dat mense se rasionele vermoëns hulle kans gee om vryheid te verbeeld. Hierdie opsie van vryheid om eie voorkeure te kies, word egter beperk deur ‘n sosiale kontrak wat vryheid waarborg maar ook beperk. In teenstelling hiermee sou mag wel vryheid kon belemmer deur spesifieke aksies uit te skakel of mense se keuses vir spesifieke aksies te frustreer, of deur nie hindernisse in hierdie verband te onderdruk nie. Die beskerming van vryheid setel dus in voortdurende onderhandeling, oop dialoog en die stryd daarom. Kernbegrippe: Mag; vryheid; definisie; konsep; liberalisme; onvryheid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力与自由:对关系的反思
这篇文章有助于讨论权力与自由之间的关系。自由是当前政治话语中的一个热点问题。因此,重要的是评估这两个重要概念之间的关系,并为进一步批判和认识这种关系提供基础。本文简要评价了这方面的一些哲学观点;特别是奥本海姆、佩蒂特、Kristjánsson和莫里斯的理论贡献。通过对这些观点的反思,可以得出结论:人类的理性能力为他们提供了想象自由的机会。然而,选择自己偏好的自由选择权受到保障和限制自由的社会契约的约束。相反,权力可以通过消除特定的行动或使他人无法选择行动或不压制这方面的障碍来干扰自由。因此,保护自由在于持续的谈判、公开的对话和争取自由的斗争。关键概念:权力;自由;定义;概念;自由主义;unfreedomOpsomming杂志所涉及的内容是:从开始的时候开始,从开始的时候开始,从开始的时候开始,从结束的时候开始,从结束的时候开始,从结束的时候开始,从结束的时候开始,从结束的时候开始。在政治讨论中,弗莱海德是一个很好的例子。这是由于层次分析法中的层次分析法与层次分析法中的层次分析法之间存在差异,因此评估者可以根据层次分析法中的层次分析法对层次分析法中的层次分析法进行评估。文章评价者在文章中提出了一种新的观点,即在文章中提出了一种新的观点:van Oppenheim, Pettit, Kristjánsson和morris。在开始学习层次结构的观点时,我们的语言是进化的,徒步旅行的gemaak数据的意义是理性的vermoëns,我们可以从所有的层次结构中看到。他说:“我想我的朋友们都很高兴,我的朋友们都很高兴。”他说:“我的朋友们都很高兴。”在讲青少年故事的时候,你可以很好地描述他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征,比如他们的性格特征。模版设计在模版设计中采用了模版设计、模版设计、模版设计、模版设计等方法。Kernbegrippe:杂志;vryheid;definisie;konsep;liberalisme;onvryheid。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Koers
Koers Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Restorative Justice as a missional call in South African intercultural context and beyond. Habermas and the Caring Society: A Trans-disciplinary Feminist Critique The mis-appropriation of Abraham Kuyper’s ideas about “worldview” by American Evangelical Christians Gereformeerde pietisme, neoplatonisme en pre-Romantieke teodisee in die Voortrekkervrou Susanna Smit (1799-1863) se godsdienstige dagboeke Die rapportering van beserings in Meganiese Tegnologie-skoolwerkswinkels met die oog op die skep van `n geborgenheidsruimte vir die leerders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1