The testing effect, collaborative learning, and retrieval-induced facilitation in a classroom setting

J. Cranney, Mi-ri Ahn, Rachel D McKinnon, Sue Morris, K. Watts
{"title":"The testing effect, collaborative learning, and retrieval-induced facilitation in a classroom setting","authors":"J. Cranney, Mi-ri Ahn, Rachel D McKinnon, Sue Morris, K. Watts","doi":"10.1080/09541440802413505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two studies were conducted to investigate aspects of the test effect in a tertiary education setting. During weekly tutorial sessions first year psychology students watched a psychobiology video (Phase 1), followed by different video-related activities (Phase 2). In the tutorial 1 week later, students took an unexpected test (Phase 3). In Phase 2 of Study 1, students completed a quiz in small groups (group quiz) or individually (individual quiz), highlighted the video transcript (re-study), or did nothing further (no-activity). Group quiz performance was superior to individual quiz in both Phase 2 and Phase 3. In Phase 3 individual quiz students performed better than no-activity students, but not better than restudy students. In exploring the individual testing effect further, Phase 2 of Study 2 included quiz (individual), restudy, and no-activity conditions. Quiz participants were presented with one (target) of two sets of questions, whereas restudy participants were presented with equivalent statements. During Phase 3, all participants answered both sets of questions (target and related). Quiz performance was superior to restudy and no-activity performance on both target and related material, supporting the retrieval-induced facilitation explanation of the testing effect. Implications of the current research for assessment practices in classroom settings are discussed, and directions for future research are indicated.","PeriodicalId":88321,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","volume":"61 1","pages":"919 - 940"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802413505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to investigate aspects of the test effect in a tertiary education setting. During weekly tutorial sessions first year psychology students watched a psychobiology video (Phase 1), followed by different video-related activities (Phase 2). In the tutorial 1 week later, students took an unexpected test (Phase 3). In Phase 2 of Study 1, students completed a quiz in small groups (group quiz) or individually (individual quiz), highlighted the video transcript (re-study), or did nothing further (no-activity). Group quiz performance was superior to individual quiz in both Phase 2 and Phase 3. In Phase 3 individual quiz students performed better than no-activity students, but not better than restudy students. In exploring the individual testing effect further, Phase 2 of Study 2 included quiz (individual), restudy, and no-activity conditions. Quiz participants were presented with one (target) of two sets of questions, whereas restudy participants were presented with equivalent statements. During Phase 3, all participants answered both sets of questions (target and related). Quiz performance was superior to restudy and no-activity performance on both target and related material, supporting the retrieval-induced facilitation explanation of the testing effect. Implications of the current research for assessment practices in classroom settings are discussed, and directions for future research are indicated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
课堂环境下的测验效果、合作学习与检索诱导促进
进行了两项研究,以调查高等教育设置的测试效果方面。在每周一次的辅导课中,一年级的心理学学生观看了一个心理生物学视频(第一阶段),随后是不同的视频相关活动(第二阶段)。在一周后的辅导课中,学生们参加了一个意想不到的测试(第三阶段)。在研究1的第二阶段,学生们以小组(小组测验)或个人(个人测验)的形式完成了一个测验,突出了视频文本(重新学习),或者什么都不做(没有活动)。第二阶段和第三阶段的集体测验成绩均优于个人测验。在第三阶段的单独测验中,学生的表现好于没有参加活动的学生,但并不比重新学习的学生好。为了进一步探索个体测试的效果,研究2的第二阶段包括测验(个体)、重新学习和不活动条件。测试参与者被提出了两组问题中的一组(目标),而再研究参与者则被提出了相同的陈述。在第三阶段,所有参与者都回答了两组问题(目标和相关)。测验成绩在目标材料和相关材料上均优于重新学习和不活动的成绩,支持检索诱发的促进解释测试效果。讨论了当前研究对课堂评估实践的影响,并指出了未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What are the Bayesian constraints in the Bayesian reader? Reply to Norris and Kinoshita (2010) Explanation versus accommodation: Reply to Bowers (2010) Assessing changes in performance and monitoring processes in individual and collaborative tests according to students' metacognitive skills The contribution of familiarity to within- and between-domain associative recognition memory: Use of a modified remember/know procedure Does masked and unmasked priming reflect Bayesian inference as implemented in the Bayesian Reader?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1