Intertextuality as an Inherent Tool for the Composition and Interpretation of Texts: A Theoretical Reappraisal

Ayenew Guadu
{"title":"Intertextuality as an Inherent Tool for the Composition and Interpretation of Texts: A Theoretical Reappraisal","authors":"Ayenew Guadu","doi":"10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The aim of the paper is to discuss the operational concepts and theory of intertextuality as a postmodern theory. Postmodern theory is a theory that emerged in the second half of the 1960s. This theory was born as a reaction to modernity and its ideals. By the 1970s, postmodern aesthetics, on which postmodern theory was based, began to be felt in almost every field of art, from architecture to painting, from literature to cinema. Intertextuality seems such a useful term because it foregrounds notions of relationality, interconnectedness, and interdependence in modern cultural life. In the Postmodern epoch, theorists often claim, it is not possible any longer to speak of originality or the uniqueness of the artistic object, be it a painting or novel, since every artistic object is so clearly assembled from bits and pieces of already existent art. An author or poet can use intertextuality deliberately for a variety of reasons. They would probably choose different ways of highlighting intertextuality depending on their intention. They may use references directly or indirectly. They might use a reference to create additional layers of meaning or make a point or place their work within a particular framework. A writer could also use a reference to create humour, highlight an inspiration or even create a reinterpretation of an existing work. The reasons and ways to use intertextuality are so varied that it is worth looking at each example to establish why and how the method was used.","PeriodicalId":14110,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Literature and Arts","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Literature and Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The aim of the paper is to discuss the operational concepts and theory of intertextuality as a postmodern theory. Postmodern theory is a theory that emerged in the second half of the 1960s. This theory was born as a reaction to modernity and its ideals. By the 1970s, postmodern aesthetics, on which postmodern theory was based, began to be felt in almost every field of art, from architecture to painting, from literature to cinema. Intertextuality seems such a useful term because it foregrounds notions of relationality, interconnectedness, and interdependence in modern cultural life. In the Postmodern epoch, theorists often claim, it is not possible any longer to speak of originality or the uniqueness of the artistic object, be it a painting or novel, since every artistic object is so clearly assembled from bits and pieces of already existent art. An author or poet can use intertextuality deliberately for a variety of reasons. They would probably choose different ways of highlighting intertextuality depending on their intention. They may use references directly or indirectly. They might use a reference to create additional layers of meaning or make a point or place their work within a particular framework. A writer could also use a reference to create humour, highlight an inspiration or even create a reinterpretation of an existing work. The reasons and ways to use intertextuality are so varied that it is worth looking at each example to establish why and how the method was used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互文性作为文本构成和解释的内在工具:一种理论再评价
本文的目的是讨论互文性作为一种后现代理论的操作概念和理论。后现代理论是20世纪60年代后半期兴起的一种理论。这一理论的诞生是对现代性及其理想的一种反应。到20世纪70年代,作为后现代理论基础的后现代美学开始渗透到几乎所有艺术领域,从建筑到绘画,从文学到电影。互文性似乎是一个非常有用的术语,因为它在现代文化生活中突出了关系、相互联系和相互依存的概念。在后现代时代,理论家经常声称,不可能再谈论艺术对象的独创性或独特性,无论是绘画还是小说,因为每一件艺术对象都是如此清楚地从已经存在的艺术的碎片中组装而成。作者或诗人可以出于各种原因故意使用互文性。他们可能会根据自己的意图选择不同的方式来突出互文性。他们可以直接或间接地使用引用。他们可能会使用参考来创造额外的意义层,或者提出一个观点,或者将他们的工作置于一个特定的框架中。作家还可以使用参考来创造幽默,突出灵感,甚至对现有作品进行重新解释。使用互文性的原因和方法各不相同,因此有必要查看每个示例,以确定为什么以及如何使用该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chinese-English Translation of Curse Words in A Dream of Red Mansions: Literal Versus Free Translation Romanticism and Nonviolence: Percy Bysshe Shelley Exhumed Spiritual Disorientation: A Study of Place in Linda Hogan’s Solar Storms from the Perspective of Human Geography A Keyword in Western Literary Theory: Text The Objectification of Women in Adonis Durado’s “Balaki Ko ‘Day Samtang Gasakay Ta’g Habalhabal”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1