Early management of deep sternal wound infections using omental flaps

Ashraf Zahra , Hosam F. Sayed , Mohamed Abd El-Hafez Fouly , Mahmoud Ghalwash
{"title":"Early management of deep sternal wound infections using omental flaps","authors":"Ashraf Zahra ,&nbsp;Hosam F. Sayed ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abd El-Hafez Fouly ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Ghalwash","doi":"10.1016/j.jescts.2018.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) are a grave complication that occurs in 0.3%–5% of post-sternotomy patients. In the meantime, there is no consensus over the most appropriate surgical management for sternal wound infections, following open heart surgery. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the early versus late use of omental-flaps for DSWI and mediastinitis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients with DSWI following open cardiac surgeries with variable risk factors, degrees of infection and timing of management. The omental-flap was obtained from the greater omentum and transposed into the pleural cavity through a diaphragmatic incision.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 15 enrolled patients, seven (46.6%) were diabetics and eight (53.3%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The severe form of mediastinitis occurred with gram-negative infections due to endotoxemia, as well as with resistant infections as methicillin-resistant staph aureus. Eleven patients had a primary omental-flap coverage after debridement (group I), while the other four underwent sternal rewiring, followed by omental-flap coverage (group II). Only three patients (27.2%) in group I died post-operatively, compared to four patients (100%) in group II. Among group I patients, eight had an early omental-flap coverage (IA), while three had a late coverage (IB). Only two patients died after early management, while five out of the seven (71.4%) patients (groups IB and II) died.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Early management of mediastinitis through omental-flaps has a better prognosis than rewiring. This should include a high index of clinical suspicion and a close post-operative follow-up of clinical manifestations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 141-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jescts.2018.02.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110578X17302249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) are a grave complication that occurs in 0.3%–5% of post-sternotomy patients. In the meantime, there is no consensus over the most appropriate surgical management for sternal wound infections, following open heart surgery. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the early versus late use of omental-flaps for DSWI and mediastinitis.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with DSWI following open cardiac surgeries with variable risk factors, degrees of infection and timing of management. The omental-flap was obtained from the greater omentum and transposed into the pleural cavity through a diaphragmatic incision.

Results

Out of the 15 enrolled patients, seven (46.6%) were diabetics and eight (53.3%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The severe form of mediastinitis occurred with gram-negative infections due to endotoxemia, as well as with resistant infections as methicillin-resistant staph aureus. Eleven patients had a primary omental-flap coverage after debridement (group I), while the other four underwent sternal rewiring, followed by omental-flap coverage (group II). Only three patients (27.2%) in group I died post-operatively, compared to four patients (100%) in group II. Among group I patients, eight had an early omental-flap coverage (IA), while three had a late coverage (IB). Only two patients died after early management, while five out of the seven (71.4%) patients (groups IB and II) died.

Conclusions

Early management of mediastinitis through omental-flaps has a better prognosis than rewiring. This should include a high index of clinical suspicion and a close post-operative follow-up of clinical manifestations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大网膜瓣早期治疗胸骨深部伤口感染
背景:胸骨深部伤口感染(DSWI)是一种严重的并发症,发生率为0.3%-5%的胸骨切开术后患者。与此同时,对于心脏直视手术后胸骨伤口感染的最合适的外科治疗方法尚无共识。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在评估早期和晚期使用网膜皮瓣治疗DSWI和纵隔炎。方法本回顾性研究纳入了具有不同危险因素、感染程度和治疗时机的心脏直视手术后DSWI患者。网膜瓣取自大网膜,经横膈膜切口转置于胸膜腔内。结果15例患者中,糖尿病患者7例(46.6%),慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者8例(53.3%)。由于内毒素血症引起的革兰氏阴性感染以及耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌等耐药感染可发生严重的纵隔炎。11例患者在清创后进行了初级网膜瓣覆盖(I组),而另外4例患者进行了胸骨重新连接,随后进行了网膜瓣覆盖(II组)。I组中只有3例患者(27.2%)术后死亡,而II组中有4例患者(100%)术后死亡。在I组患者中,8例早期网膜瓣覆盖(IA), 3例晚期网膜瓣覆盖(IB)。只有2例患者在早期治疗后死亡,而7例患者中有5例(71.4%)(IB组和II组)死亡。结论早期应用网膜皮瓣治疗纵隔炎的预后优于重线治疗。这应包括高度的临床怀疑和术后对临床表现的密切随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: Early outcome of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery Thoracoscopic decortication for stage III empyema; a minimal invasive approach in a delayed presentation disease Surgical management of congenital lobar emphysema: A 15 years experience in a tertiary thoracic surgery unit Outcome of pump assisted beating mitral valve replacement in patients with chronic severe mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction. A clinical randomized trial Histopathological changes of right ventricle outflow tract myocardium in relation to age in tetralogy of Fallot and its relation to clinical outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1