Test of the job demand resources model in Thailand

Manjiri Kunte, Parisa Rungruang
{"title":"Test of the job demand resources model in Thailand","authors":"Manjiri Kunte, Parisa Rungruang","doi":"10.1108/IJOTB-03-2018-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to test the hypothesized relationships between job demands, job resources and personal resources toward work engagement, by utilizing a cross section of Thai employees.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, a group of employees (n=416) responded to a set of self-report surveys on job demands, job resources, personal resources and work engagement.FindingsThe results of the hierarchical regression analysis supported the relationships between job demands (i.e. workload and role conflict), job resources, personal resources (self-efficacy) and work engagement. In addition, the results supported the role of (positive) self-esteem as moderator in the role ambiguity and work engagement relationship, and the role of self-efficacy in buffering the effect of role conflict and workload on work engagement. The final model explained 43 percent of the variance in the dependent variable.Research limitations/implicationsThis study will help managers in understanding employee expectations and providing appropriate feedback. Devising effective jobs, which lead to perceptions of meaningfulness, safety and availability leading to improved engagement.Originality/valueThis is the first study employing the job demands resources model in a cross-sectional study in Thailand.","PeriodicalId":35239,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-03-2018-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to test the hypothesized relationships between job demands, job resources and personal resources toward work engagement, by utilizing a cross section of Thai employees.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, a group of employees (n=416) responded to a set of self-report surveys on job demands, job resources, personal resources and work engagement.FindingsThe results of the hierarchical regression analysis supported the relationships between job demands (i.e. workload and role conflict), job resources, personal resources (self-efficacy) and work engagement. In addition, the results supported the role of (positive) self-esteem as moderator in the role ambiguity and work engagement relationship, and the role of self-efficacy in buffering the effect of role conflict and workload on work engagement. The final model explained 43 percent of the variance in the dependent variable.Research limitations/implicationsThis study will help managers in understanding employee expectations and providing appropriate feedback. Devising effective jobs, which lead to perceptions of meaningfulness, safety and availability leading to improved engagement.Originality/valueThis is the first study employing the job demands resources model in a cross-sectional study in Thailand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国就业需求资源模型的检验
本文的目的是通过利用泰国员工的横截面来测试工作需求,工作资源和个人资源之间对工作投入的假设关系。设计/方法/方法在这项研究中,一组员工(n=416)回答了一组关于工作需求、工作资源、个人资源和工作投入的自我报告调查。层次回归分析的结果支持工作需求(即工作量和角色冲突)、工作资源、个人资源(自我效能感)和工作投入之间的关系。此外,研究结果还支持了(积极)自尊在角色模糊和工作投入关系中的调节作用,以及自我效能感在缓冲角色冲突和工作量对工作投入的影响中的作用。最终的模型解释了因变量中43%的方差。研究的局限性/启示本研究将有助于管理者了解员工的期望并提供适当的反馈。设计有效的工作,让人们感受到工作的意义、安全性和可用性,从而提高参与度。原创性/价值本研究首次采用工作需求资源模型在泰国进行横断面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior
International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior brings together researchers and practitioners, both within and outside the United States, who are in the areas of organization theory, management, development, and behavior. This journal covers all private, public and not-for-profit organizations’ theories and behavior.
期刊最新文献
Workplace mitigators of the negative relationship between stress and health How do workplace stressors during COVID-19 affect health frontline employees in Iran: Investigating the role of employee resilience and constituent attachment Exploring context-related challenges and adaptive responses while working from home during COVID-19 Helicopter helping in the organization: its conceptualization, key characteristics and possible antecedents and consequences “Can politics really be beneficial?” Toward a model for positive politics through consensus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1