Deposition of sulphur and nitrogen in Europe 1900–2050. Model calculations and comparison to historical observations

M. Engardt, D. Simpson, M. Schwikowski, L. Granat
{"title":"Deposition of sulphur and nitrogen in Europe 1900–2050. Model calculations and comparison to historical observations","authors":"M. Engardt, D. Simpson, M. Schwikowski, L. Granat","doi":"10.1080/16000889.2017.1328945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As a contribution to an EU project which dealt with the effects of climate change, air pollution impacts and ecosystems, two different atmospheric chemical transport models were used to simulate the depositions of acidifying and eutrophying pollutants over Europe for the period 1900–2050. Given the unavoidable uncertainties in the historical inputs to these simulations (emissions, meteorology), we generated a new and unique data-set for the purposes of model evaluation; comprising data from the European Air Chemistry Network (EACN) in operation from 1955 to early 1980s and more recent data from the EMEP monitoring network. The two models showed similar and reasonable skills in reproducing both the EACN and EMEP observational data although the MATCH model consistently simulates higher concentrations and depositions than the EMEP model. To further assess the models’ ability to reproduce the long-term trend in sulphur and nitrogen deposition we compared modelled concentrations of major ions in precipitation with data extracted from a glacier in the European Alps. While, the shape and timing of the nss-sulphate data agrees reasonably, the ice core data indicate persistently high nitrogen concentrations of oxidised and reduced nitrogen after the 1980s which does not correspond to the model simulations or data from Western Europe in the EMEP monitoring network. This study concludes that nss-sulphate deposition to Europe was already clearly elevated in the year 1900, but has now (mid-2010s) decreased to about 70% of what it was at the beginning of the last century. The deposition of oxidised nitrogen to Europe peaked during the 1980s but has since decreased to half of its maximum value; still it is 3–4 times higher than in the year 1900. The annual deposition of reduced nitrogen to Europe is currently more than two times as high as the conditions in the year 1900.","PeriodicalId":22320,"journal":{"name":"Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"131","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2017.1328945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 131

Abstract

Abstract As a contribution to an EU project which dealt with the effects of climate change, air pollution impacts and ecosystems, two different atmospheric chemical transport models were used to simulate the depositions of acidifying and eutrophying pollutants over Europe for the period 1900–2050. Given the unavoidable uncertainties in the historical inputs to these simulations (emissions, meteorology), we generated a new and unique data-set for the purposes of model evaluation; comprising data from the European Air Chemistry Network (EACN) in operation from 1955 to early 1980s and more recent data from the EMEP monitoring network. The two models showed similar and reasonable skills in reproducing both the EACN and EMEP observational data although the MATCH model consistently simulates higher concentrations and depositions than the EMEP model. To further assess the models’ ability to reproduce the long-term trend in sulphur and nitrogen deposition we compared modelled concentrations of major ions in precipitation with data extracted from a glacier in the European Alps. While, the shape and timing of the nss-sulphate data agrees reasonably, the ice core data indicate persistently high nitrogen concentrations of oxidised and reduced nitrogen after the 1980s which does not correspond to the model simulations or data from Western Europe in the EMEP monitoring network. This study concludes that nss-sulphate deposition to Europe was already clearly elevated in the year 1900, but has now (mid-2010s) decreased to about 70% of what it was at the beginning of the last century. The deposition of oxidised nitrogen to Europe peaked during the 1980s but has since decreased to half of its maximum value; still it is 3–4 times higher than in the year 1900. The annual deposition of reduced nitrogen to Europe is currently more than two times as high as the conditions in the year 1900.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1900-2050年欧洲硫和氮的沉积。模式计算和与历史观测的比较
作为对欧盟一个研究气候变化、空气污染影响和生态系统影响的项目的贡献,使用了两种不同的大气化学输送模型来模拟1900-2050年欧洲酸化和富营养化污染物的沉积。考虑到这些模拟的历史输入(排放、气象)中不可避免的不确定性,我们生成了一个新的、独特的数据集,用于模式评估;包括欧洲空气化学网络(EACN)在1955年至1980年代初的数据,以及EMEP监测网的最新数据。两个模式在模拟EACN和EMEP观测数据方面表现出相似和合理的技能,尽管MATCH模式始终比EMEP模式模拟更高的浓度和沉积。为了进一步评估模型重现硫和氮沉积长期趋势的能力,我们将模拟的降水中主要离子浓度与从欧洲阿尔卑斯山冰川提取的数据进行了比较。然而,nss-硫酸盐数据的形状和时间相当一致,冰芯数据表明,20世纪80年代以后,氧化氮和还原氮的浓度持续较高,这与模式模拟或EMEP监测网中西欧的数据不一致。这项研究的结论是,在1900年,欧洲的nss-硫酸盐沉积已经明显增加,但现在(2010年代中期)已经减少到上世纪初的70%左右。氧化氮在欧洲的沉积在20世纪80年代达到顶峰,但此后已降至其最大值的一半;但仍是1900年的3-4倍。目前,每年向欧洲沉积的还原氮是1900年的两倍多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Machine Learning Approach to Investigating the Relative Importance of Meteorological and Aerosol-Related Parameters in Determining Cloud Microphysical Properties Dimensionless Parameterizations of Air-Sea CO2 Gas Transfer Velocity on Surface Waves Transport of Mineral Dust Into the Arctic in Two Reanalysis Datasets of Atmospheric Composition The Climatic Role of Interactive Leaf Phenology in the Vegetation-Atmosphere System of Radiative-Convective Equilibrium Storm-Resolving Simulations Tropical and Boreal Forest – Atmosphere Interactions: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1