Feasibility of microsurgery in burn injury and the effect of stem cell application

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.4103/tjps.tjps_25_22
E. Gur, Y. Tiftikcioglu, G. Ercan, H. Vatansever, Y. Işik, H. Kabadayı, Ayfer Karlıtepe, E. Songur
{"title":"Feasibility of microsurgery in burn injury and the effect of stem cell application","authors":"E. Gur, Y. Tiftikcioglu, G. Ercan, H. Vatansever, Y. Işik, H. Kabadayı, Ayfer Karlıtepe, E. Songur","doi":"10.4103/tjps.tjps_25_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Burn is one of the most severe traumas and can affect skin, muscle, or bone. Although early debridement and use of skin grafts have proven their benefits; in some cases, free flaps are required for early reconstruction. It is undisputed that choosing recipient vessels from unburned or undamaged zones increase the success of anastomosis. However, it may not be possible, especially in large burns. Our study aims to investigate the success of anastomosis beneath burned tissues and the effects of stem cell application. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one Wistar albino male rats weighing 250 g on average were divided equally into three Groups. In Group I, femoral artery anastomoses were done as control group. Inguinal area of 7 rats was burned as deep 2nd degree depth, and femoral artery anastomoses were done immediately beneath the burned tissues. In Group III, after burning inguinal area and making anastomoses, adipogenic stem cells were applied on the anastomosis sites. All anastomoses were checked at postoperative 3rd day. Results: One rat of Group I died in the postoperative 3rd day and one rat of Group II had a wide wound dehiscence including many of foreign body on anastomosis zone so both were excluded from the study. One anastomosis in Groups I and 3 anastomoses in both Groups II and III failed and others were successful. Statistical analyzes showed that there was no difference between groups (P < 0.05). Stem cell application was not effective on anastomosis patency in burn injury but has benefits in wound healing according to our study. Conclusion: Recipient vessels can be chosen from adjacent area to burn or inflammation zone safely for microvascular anastomosis if there is no direct burn damage on vessels.","PeriodicalId":42065,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjps.tjps_25_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Burn is one of the most severe traumas and can affect skin, muscle, or bone. Although early debridement and use of skin grafts have proven their benefits; in some cases, free flaps are required for early reconstruction. It is undisputed that choosing recipient vessels from unburned or undamaged zones increase the success of anastomosis. However, it may not be possible, especially in large burns. Our study aims to investigate the success of anastomosis beneath burned tissues and the effects of stem cell application. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one Wistar albino male rats weighing 250 g on average were divided equally into three Groups. In Group I, femoral artery anastomoses were done as control group. Inguinal area of 7 rats was burned as deep 2nd degree depth, and femoral artery anastomoses were done immediately beneath the burned tissues. In Group III, after burning inguinal area and making anastomoses, adipogenic stem cells were applied on the anastomosis sites. All anastomoses were checked at postoperative 3rd day. Results: One rat of Group I died in the postoperative 3rd day and one rat of Group II had a wide wound dehiscence including many of foreign body on anastomosis zone so both were excluded from the study. One anastomosis in Groups I and 3 anastomoses in both Groups II and III failed and others were successful. Statistical analyzes showed that there was no difference between groups (P < 0.05). Stem cell application was not effective on anastomosis patency in burn injury but has benefits in wound healing according to our study. Conclusion: Recipient vessels can be chosen from adjacent area to burn or inflammation zone safely for microvascular anastomosis if there is no direct burn damage on vessels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
显微外科治疗烧伤的可行性及干细胞应用的效果
烧伤是最严重的创伤之一,可影响皮肤、肌肉或骨骼。虽然早期清创和使用皮肤移植已被证明是有益的;在某些情况下,早期重建需要自由皮瓣。毫无疑问,选择未烧伤或未损伤的受体血管可以增加吻合的成功率。然而,这可能是不可能的,特别是在大面积烧伤。本研究旨在探讨烧伤组织下吻合术的成功及干细胞应用的效果。材料与方法:取21只平均体重250 g的Wistar白化雄性大鼠,随机分为3组。第一组以股动脉吻合术为对照组。7只大鼠腹股沟处深2度深度烧伤,在烧伤组织正下方行股动脉吻合。第三组:烧灼腹股沟区,吻合后,应用脂肪干细胞于吻合部位。术后第3天检查吻合口。结果:ⅰ组1只大鼠术后第3天死亡,ⅱ组1只大鼠创面裂开较宽,吻合区有较多异物,均排除在本研究之外。ⅰ组1例,ⅱ组和ⅲ组均有3例吻合失败,其余均成功。经统计学分析,两组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。本研究表明,干细胞应用于烧伤术后吻合口通畅效果不明显,但有利于创面愈合。结论:在血管无直接烧伤损伤的情况下,可选择邻近烧伤区或炎症区接受血管进行微血管吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Glomus tumors of the digit: A retrospective analysis of clinical and functional outcomes The effect of deferoxamine on fat graft survival in tamoxifen use: An experimental study Nasal reconstruction in a rare case of unilateral arhinia in bosma arhinia microphthalmia syndrome A complication after radiofrequency ablation: Skin necrosis Comparative analysis of speech outcomes in the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency: Traditional superior-based pharyngeal flap and pharyngeal flap combined with radical intravelar veloplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1