A Literature Review of Health Care Professional Attitudes Toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine

M. Sewitch, M. Cepoiu, N. Rigillo, Donald Sproule
{"title":"A Literature Review of Health Care Professional Attitudes Toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine","authors":"M. Sewitch, M. Cepoiu, N. Rigillo, Donald Sproule","doi":"10.1177/1533210108325549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To summarize health care professionals' attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Methods. In October 2006, we searched Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED; 1985—2006), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE; 1980—2006), and MED-LINE (1960—2006) for Canadian or US studies of health care professionals' attitudes toward CAM, published in English or French. Results. A total of 21 surveys of physicians, nurses, public health professionals, dietitians, social workers, medical/nursing school faculty, and pharmacists were included that focused on beliefs about CAM efficacy, personal use, clinical practice use and referrals, communication with patients about CAM, level of knowledge, and the need for information regarding various CAM therapies. Physicians were more negative compared to other health care professionals. Positive attitudes toward CAM did not correlate with CAM referral or prescription patterns. Health care professionals of all disciplines wanted more information about CAM. Conclusions. Heterogeneity in the CAM definition and questionnaire items precluded summarizing health care professionals' attitudes toward CAM. Providing CAM education to health care professionals may help to integrate CAM into mainstream medical care.","PeriodicalId":10611,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Health Practice Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"139 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"79","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Health Practice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533210108325549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 79

Abstract

Objective. To summarize health care professionals' attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Methods. In October 2006, we searched Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED; 1985—2006), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE; 1980—2006), and MED-LINE (1960—2006) for Canadian or US studies of health care professionals' attitudes toward CAM, published in English or French. Results. A total of 21 surveys of physicians, nurses, public health professionals, dietitians, social workers, medical/nursing school faculty, and pharmacists were included that focused on beliefs about CAM efficacy, personal use, clinical practice use and referrals, communication with patients about CAM, level of knowledge, and the need for information regarding various CAM therapies. Physicians were more negative compared to other health care professionals. Positive attitudes toward CAM did not correlate with CAM referral or prescription patterns. Health care professionals of all disciplines wanted more information about CAM. Conclusions. Heterogeneity in the CAM definition and questionnaire items precluded summarizing health care professionals' attitudes toward CAM. Providing CAM education to health care professionals may help to integrate CAM into mainstream medical care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生保健专业人员对补充和替代医学态度的文献综述
目标。总结卫生保健专业人员对补充替代医学(CAM)的态度。方法。2006年10月,我们检索了联合和补充医学数据库(AMED;1985-2006),摘录医学数据库(EMBASE;1980-2006)和MED-LINE(1960-2006),以英语或法语出版,用于加拿大或美国医疗保健专业人员对CAM的态度的研究。结果。共对医生、护士、公共卫生专业人员、营养师、社会工作者、医学/护理学校教师和药剂师进行了21项调查,重点是对辅助医学疗效的看法、个人使用、临床实践使用和转诊、与患者就辅助医学的沟通、知识水平以及对各种辅助医学疗法信息的需求。与其他卫生保健专业人员相比,医生更消极。对CAM的积极态度与CAM转诊或处方模式无关。所有学科的卫生保健专业人员都希望获得有关辅助医学的更多信息。结论。CAM定义和问卷项目的异质性妨碍了对卫生保健专业人员对CAM的态度进行总结。向卫生保健专业人员提供辅助医学教育可能有助于将辅助医学纳入主流医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Meditation Teacher: A New Role for Health Professionals Vitamin B2: Riboflavin Does Vitamin E and C Supplementation Improve the Recovery From Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery? Mythology of Antioxidant Vitamins? Folic Acid: Beyond Metabolism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1