A comparison study of HRES for electrification of a rural city in Algeria

IF 1.5 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS Wind Engineering Pub Date : 2022-11-08 DOI:10.1177/0309524X221133810
A. Yahiaoui, A. Tlemçani
{"title":"A comparison study of HRES for electrification of a rural city in Algeria","authors":"A. Yahiaoui, A. Tlemçani","doi":"10.1177/0309524X221133810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimization is one of the most important branches of applied mathematics and much research both practical and theoretical has been devoted to it. In this in this paper we have used the software HOMER to solve optimization problem on optimal sizing of three hybrid renewable energy systems involving of PV panel, wind turbine, battery bank, electrolyzer, H2 tank, and fuel cell for possible installation in Timimoun city in Algeria desert. The proposed systems are applied for optimal configuration, minimization of the total net present cost (TNPC) and cost of energy (COE). The study showed us that each system provides electrical power for this region, TNPC of the PV/Wind/Battery system is 22,621,932 $ with COE of 1.673 $/kWh, it is the most expensive system that we cannot adopt because of its high cost. The PV/Wind/Electrolyzer/H2 tank/Fuel cell system is cheaper than the first in terms of TNPC which equal 14,945,818 $ with COE of 1.105 $/kWh. This system is also undesirable because it is more expensive than the PV/Wind/Battery/Electrolyzer/H2 tank/Fuel cell hybrid system. The TNPC of this system is 12,322,474 $ with COE of 0.912 $/kWh, which makes it cheaper than the first two systems. The results prove that the hybrid PV/Wind/Battery/Electrolyzer/H2 tank/Fuel cell system meet the electrical energy need of the region.","PeriodicalId":51570,"journal":{"name":"Wind Engineering","volume":"60 1","pages":"528 - 545"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wind Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X221133810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Optimization is one of the most important branches of applied mathematics and much research both practical and theoretical has been devoted to it. In this in this paper we have used the software HOMER to solve optimization problem on optimal sizing of three hybrid renewable energy systems involving of PV panel, wind turbine, battery bank, electrolyzer, H2 tank, and fuel cell for possible installation in Timimoun city in Algeria desert. The proposed systems are applied for optimal configuration, minimization of the total net present cost (TNPC) and cost of energy (COE). The study showed us that each system provides electrical power for this region, TNPC of the PV/Wind/Battery system is 22,621,932 $ with COE of 1.673 $/kWh, it is the most expensive system that we cannot adopt because of its high cost. The PV/Wind/Electrolyzer/H2 tank/Fuel cell system is cheaper than the first in terms of TNPC which equal 14,945,818 $ with COE of 1.105 $/kWh. This system is also undesirable because it is more expensive than the PV/Wind/Battery/Electrolyzer/H2 tank/Fuel cell hybrid system. The TNPC of this system is 12,322,474 $ with COE of 0.912 $/kWh, which makes it cheaper than the first two systems. The results prove that the hybrid PV/Wind/Battery/Electrolyzer/H2 tank/Fuel cell system meet the electrical energy need of the region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔及利亚农村城市电气化的HRES比较研究
优化是应用数学的一个重要分支,在实践和理论方面都有大量的研究。本文采用HOMER软件对阿尔及利亚蒂米蒙沙漠可能安装的光伏板、风力涡轮机、蓄电池组、电解槽、H2罐和燃料电池三个混合可再生能源系统的最优尺寸进行了优化求解。所提出的系统用于优化配置,最小化总净当前成本(TNPC)和能源成本(COE)。研究表明,每个系统都为该地区提供电力,PV/Wind/Battery系统的TNPC为22,621,932 $,COE为1.673 $/kWh,这是我们无法采用的最昂贵的系统,因为它的成本很高。光伏/风能/电解槽/H2罐/燃料电池系统在TNPC方面比第一个系统便宜,TNPC为14,945,818美元,COE为1.105美元/千瓦时。这种系统也是不可取的,因为它比光伏/风能/电池/电解槽/H2罐/燃料电池混合系统更昂贵。该系统的TNPC为12,322,474 $,COE为0.912 $/kWh,比前两个系统更便宜。结果表明,光伏/风能/电池/电解槽/氢气罐/燃料电池混合系统满足了该地区的电能需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wind Engineering
Wind Engineering ENERGY & FUELS-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Having been in continuous publication since 1977, Wind Engineering is the oldest and most authoritative English language journal devoted entirely to the technology of wind energy. Under the direction of a distinguished editor and editorial board, Wind Engineering appears bimonthly with fully refereed contributions from active figures in the field, book notices, and summaries of the more interesting papers from other sources. Papers are published in Wind Engineering on: the aerodynamics of rotors and blades; machine subsystems and components; design; test programmes; power generation and transmission; measuring and recording techniques; installations and applications; and economic, environmental and legal aspects.
期刊最新文献
Extended state observer-based primary load frequency controller for power systems with ultra-high wind-energy penetration Quantifying the impact of sensor precision on power output of a wind turbine: A sensitivity analysis via Monte Carlo simulation study Design and realization of a pre-production platform for wind turbine manufacturing Analysis of wind power curve modeling using multi-model regression On the aerodynamics of dual-stage co-axial vertical-axis wind turbines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1