南京 192 Ir放射事故患者照后第4年细胞遗传学随访

陆雪, Xue Lu, 赵骅, Zhao Hua, 王进, Wang Jin, 李爽, Liang Shuang, 田雪蕾, Tian Xuelei, 王福如, Wang Furu, 田梅, Tian Mei, 余宁乐, Yu Ningle, 刘青杰, Liu Qingjie
{"title":"南京 192 Ir放射事故患者照后第4年细胞遗传学随访","authors":"陆雪, Xue Lu, 赵骅, Zhao Hua, 王进, Wang Jin, 李爽, Liang Shuang, 田雪蕾, Tian Xuelei, 王福如, Wang Furu, 田梅, Tian Mei, 余宁乐, Yu Ningle, 刘青杰, Liu Qingjie","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo screen the indicators of retrospective dose estimation, based on 5 cytogenetic methods to assess the victim followed-up at 4 year after 192Ir radiation accident in Nanjing. \n \n \nMethods \nThe chromosome aberration (dic + r) assay, cytokinesis block micronucleus (MN) and nucleoplasmic bridge (NPB) assay, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based and G banding-based translocation analysis were used to retrospective biological dose estimation. \n \n \nResults \nThe estimated doses of FISH-based and G banding -based analysis were 1.45 and 1.21 Gy respectively, which was similar to the biological dose estimated short time after the accident. However, the estimated doses by chromosome aberration, micronucleus and nucleoplasmic bridge method were 0.56, 0.45 and 0.41 Gy respectively, which were lower than the corresponding biodose. Correction factors were used to adjust the biodose. \n \n \nConclusions \nIn the 4th years after exposure, the estimated biological doses by FISH-based and G banding-based translocation were consistent with the biodose.Therefore, the two methods were suitable for retrospective dose estimation, while correction factors should be considered in chromosome aberration method for retrospective dose estimation. \n \n \nKey words: \nChromosome aberration; Fluorescence in situ hybrdization; G banding; Biological dose estimation; Correction coefficient","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"140 1","pages":"183-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.03.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To screen the indicators of retrospective dose estimation, based on 5 cytogenetic methods to assess the victim followed-up at 4 year after 192Ir radiation accident in Nanjing. Methods The chromosome aberration (dic + r) assay, cytokinesis block micronucleus (MN) and nucleoplasmic bridge (NPB) assay, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based and G banding-based translocation analysis were used to retrospective biological dose estimation. Results The estimated doses of FISH-based and G banding -based analysis were 1.45 and 1.21 Gy respectively, which was similar to the biological dose estimated short time after the accident. However, the estimated doses by chromosome aberration, micronucleus and nucleoplasmic bridge method were 0.56, 0.45 and 0.41 Gy respectively, which were lower than the corresponding biodose. Correction factors were used to adjust the biodose. Conclusions In the 4th years after exposure, the estimated biological doses by FISH-based and G banding-based translocation were consistent with the biodose.Therefore, the two methods were suitable for retrospective dose estimation, while correction factors should be considered in chromosome aberration method for retrospective dose estimation. Key words: Chromosome aberration; Fluorescence in situ hybrdization; G banding; Biological dose estimation; Correction coefficient
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南京 192 Ir放射事故患者照后第4年细胞遗传学随访
目的筛选基于5种细胞遗传学方法的回顾性剂量估计指标,对南京地区192Ir辐射事故4年随访患者进行评估。方法采用染色体畸变(dic + r)测定、细胞分裂阻断微核(MN)和核质桥(NPB)测定、基于荧光原位杂交(FISH)和基于G带易位分析进行回顾性生物剂量估计。结果基于fish和G带分析的估计剂量分别为1.45 Gy和1.21 Gy,与事故发生后短时间内估计的生物剂量相近。而染色体畸变法、微核法和核质桥法的估计剂量分别为0.56、0.45和0.41 Gy,均低于相应的生物剂量。校正因子用于调整生物剂量。结论暴露后第4年,基于fish和基于G带易位估计的生物剂量与生物剂量一致。因此,这两种方法适用于回顾性剂量估计,而染色体畸变法用于回顾性剂量估计时应考虑校正因素。关键词:染色体畸变;荧光原位杂交;G显带;生物剂量估计;修正系数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华放射医学与防护杂志
中华放射医学与防护杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6377
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Infection control status of novel coronavirus pneumonia and radiation safety at CT workplace Current status of the application of radiodiagnosis and radiotherapy resources in Huai'an City in 2020 The application value of low-dose CT scan in pregnant women with COVID-19 Eeffects of tube voltage on image quality and radiation dose of paranasal sinus CT examination Analyzing quality of life and influencing factors in patients with bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after radiotherapy by bone pain scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1