‘The data is gold, and we are the gold-diggers’: whiteness, race and contemporary academic research in eastern DRC

IF 1.3 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Critical African Studies Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1080/21681392.2020.1724806
G. Marchais, Paulin Bazuzi, Aimable Amani Lameke
{"title":"‘The data is gold, and we are the gold-diggers’: whiteness, race and contemporary academic research in eastern DRC","authors":"G. Marchais, Paulin Bazuzi, Aimable Amani Lameke","doi":"10.1080/21681392.2020.1724806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The boom of the humanitarian and development industry in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and the demand for qualitative and quantitative research that has accompanied it have created a novel political economy of academic research in the region. An array of research associations and private data collection firms have emerged to respond to the international demand by Western universities and research projects. Like many industries operating on the continent, academic research has a racial dimension, which is rarely reflected upon, in part because it is often invisible to white Western researchers. This paper reflects on the creation and evolution of a non-profit association specialized in the collection of data in conflict-affected areas of eastern DRC. The research association was conceived by its Congolese and European founders as an enclave against the racism that pervades professional relations in the region, an experiment upheld by a collective commitment to academic research and an egalitarian ethos. Written from the perspective of three of its founding members, this paper analyses how racialized discursive repertoires and cognitive biases (re)appeared within the organization. We argue that these repertoires and biases serve to activate a particular mode of production, based on racial and geographic inequalities in working conditions and prospects. We interrogate the relationship between race and the system of production underpinning contemporary research, and show that, far from solely being a remnant of the colonial era, race constitutes a resource that can be tapped into, particularly in a context where empirical data, competition for funding, and ‘value for money’ are increasingly becoming the norm.","PeriodicalId":37966,"journal":{"name":"Critical African Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"372 - 394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2020.1724806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The boom of the humanitarian and development industry in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and the demand for qualitative and quantitative research that has accompanied it have created a novel political economy of academic research in the region. An array of research associations and private data collection firms have emerged to respond to the international demand by Western universities and research projects. Like many industries operating on the continent, academic research has a racial dimension, which is rarely reflected upon, in part because it is often invisible to white Western researchers. This paper reflects on the creation and evolution of a non-profit association specialized in the collection of data in conflict-affected areas of eastern DRC. The research association was conceived by its Congolese and European founders as an enclave against the racism that pervades professional relations in the region, an experiment upheld by a collective commitment to academic research and an egalitarian ethos. Written from the perspective of three of its founding members, this paper analyses how racialized discursive repertoires and cognitive biases (re)appeared within the organization. We argue that these repertoires and biases serve to activate a particular mode of production, based on racial and geographic inequalities in working conditions and prospects. We interrogate the relationship between race and the system of production underpinning contemporary research, and show that, far from solely being a remnant of the colonial era, race constitutes a resource that can be tapped into, particularly in a context where empirical data, competition for funding, and ‘value for money’ are increasingly becoming the norm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“数据是金子,我们是掘金者”:刚果民主共和国东部的白人、种族和当代学术研究
刚果民主共和国东部人道主义和发展产业的繁荣,以及随之而来的对定性和定量研究的需求,在该地区创造了一种新的学术研究政治经济学。为了响应西方大学和研究项目的国际需求,出现了一系列研究协会和私人数据收集公司。就像在非洲大陆运营的许多行业一样,学术研究也有种族层面,这一点很少得到反思,部分原因是西方白人研究人员往往看不到这一点。本文反映了一个非营利协会的创建和演变,该协会专门收集刚果民主共和国东部受冲突影响地区的数据。该研究协会是由刚果和欧洲的创始人构想的,是一个反对该地区普遍存在的职业关系中的种族主义的飞地,是一个由集体致力于学术研究和平等主义精神所支持的实验。本文从三个创始成员的角度出发,分析了种族化的话语库和认知偏见是如何在组织中出现的。我们认为,基于工作条件和前景的种族和地理不平等,这些技能和偏见有助于激活特定的生产模式。我们探讨了种族与支撑当代研究的生产体系之间的关系,并表明,种族绝不仅仅是殖民时代的残余,种族构成了一种可以利用的资源,特别是在经验数据、资金竞争和“物有所值”日益成为常态的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical African Studies
Critical African Studies Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Critical African Studies seeks to return Africanist scholarship to the heart of theoretical innovation within each of its constituent disciplines, including Anthropology, Political Science, Sociology, History, Law and Economics. We offer authors a more flexible publishing platform than other journals, allowing them greater space to develop empirical discussions alongside theoretical and conceptual engagements. We aim to publish scholarly articles that offer both innovative empirical contributions, grounded in original fieldwork, and also innovative theoretical engagements. This speaks to our broader intention to promote the deployment of thorough empirical work for the purposes of sophisticated theoretical innovation. We invite contributions that meet the aims of the journal, including special issue proposals that offer fresh empirical and theoretical insights into African Studies debates.
期刊最新文献
A criticism of the notions of Nwansa and Nwanju in conversational approach to African philosophy Colour-blind racism in post-apartheid South Africa The ‘iron donkey’: the social lives of bicycles in northern Uganda, 1903–2015 Hybrid ‘Authenticities’ in youth popular culture: performing costume and identity in the work of South Africa’s Sho Madjozi Ancestral rendezvous: leveraging the San culture in Botswana contemporary theatre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1