Miscomprehension, meaning, and phonology: The unknown and phonological Armstrong illusions

Meredith A. Shafto, D. G. MacKay
{"title":"Miscomprehension, meaning, and phonology: The unknown and phonological Armstrong illusions","authors":"Meredith A. Shafto, D. G. MacKay","doi":"10.1080/09541440902941967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People often fail to detect the anomalous word in questions such as How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the Ark?, and incorrectly answer “two” despite knowing that Noah rather than Moses launched the Ark. The current study tests an account of this “Moses illusion” in which Moses mistakes reflect miscomprehension of the presented word (Moses) as the expected word (Noah) due to bottom-up (phonological) priming, top-down (semantic) priming, or both. Two experiments supported this miscomprehension account: Lexical- and proposition-level information contributed autonomously to miscomprehensions and Moses mistakes in Experiment 1, and prior presentation of nonanomalous information reduced subsequent anomaly detection in Experiment 2. Present results contradict accounts in which Moses mistakes involve semantic but not phonological processes, involve mechanisms different from everyday language comprehension, or involve special anomaly detection mechanisms for calculating the coherence between the Moses question and the anomalous word.","PeriodicalId":88321,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","volume":"71 1","pages":"529 - 568"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440902941967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

People often fail to detect the anomalous word in questions such as How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the Ark?, and incorrectly answer “two” despite knowing that Noah rather than Moses launched the Ark. The current study tests an account of this “Moses illusion” in which Moses mistakes reflect miscomprehension of the presented word (Moses) as the expected word (Noah) due to bottom-up (phonological) priming, top-down (semantic) priming, or both. Two experiments supported this miscomprehension account: Lexical- and proposition-level information contributed autonomously to miscomprehensions and Moses mistakes in Experiment 1, and prior presentation of nonanomalous information reduced subsequent anomaly detection in Experiment 2. Present results contradict accounts in which Moses mistakes involve semantic but not phonological processes, involve mechanisms different from everyday language comprehension, or involve special anomaly detection mechanisms for calculating the coherence between the Moses question and the anomalous word.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
误解、意义和音系:未知的和音系上的阿姆斯特朗错觉
人们常常在诸如“摩西带了多少种动物上方舟”这样的问题中察觉不到这个反常的词。,错误地回答“2”,尽管知道是诺亚而不是摩西发射了方舟。目前的研究测试了“摩西错觉”的一种解释,其中摩西的错误反映了由于自下而上(语音)启动,自上而下(语义)启动,或两者兼而有之,将呈现的词(摩西)误解为预期的词(诺亚)。两个实验支持这一误解解释:在实验1中,词汇和命题层面的信息自主地导致了误解和摩西错误,而在实验2中,事先呈现的非异常信息减少了随后的异常检测。目前的结果与以下说法相矛盾:摩西题错误涉及语义过程而非语音过程,涉及不同于日常语言理解的机制,或涉及计算摩西题与异常词之间一致性的特殊异常检测机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What are the Bayesian constraints in the Bayesian reader? Reply to Norris and Kinoshita (2010) Explanation versus accommodation: Reply to Bowers (2010) Assessing changes in performance and monitoring processes in individual and collaborative tests according to students' metacognitive skills The contribution of familiarity to within- and between-domain associative recognition memory: Use of a modified remember/know procedure Does masked and unmasked priming reflect Bayesian inference as implemented in the Bayesian Reader?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1