Mediatory Role of Substance Use Coping in the Relationship between Combat Exposure and PTSD among Nigerian Police Exposed to Boko-Haram Insurgency

Fredrick Sonter Anongo, James Abel, Akuraga Simeon Kum
{"title":"Mediatory Role of Substance Use Coping in the Relationship between Combat Exposure and PTSD among Nigerian Police Exposed to Boko-Haram Insurgency","authors":"Fredrick Sonter Anongo, James Abel, Akuraga Simeon Kum","doi":"10.46527/2582-3264.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, studies have identified posttraumatic stress disorder as one of the greatest problems in military and police population worldwide. Apparently, extant literature have associated this problem with combat exposure; however, what is still unclear is whether adopting certain coping strategies like substance use after homecoming from combat deployment could increase vulnerability to combat-related PTSD especially among Nigerian police population that has been associated with high substance use coping. This study therefore examined the mediatory role of substance use coping in the relationship between combat exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder among Nigerian mobile police personnel exposed to BokoHaram insurgency in the North-eastern, Nigeria. Data were collected using standardized questionnaires on a sample of 630 participants. Two hypotheses were stated and analysed using Pearson correlation, linear and hierarchical multiple regression, and results revealed a significant positive relationship between combat exposure (r= .36; p<.01), substance use coping (r=.28; p<.01) and PTSD; as well as combat exposure and substance use(r= .19; p<.05). Additional findings indicated that combat exposure (β=.09, t= 2.2; p<.05) and substance use coping strategy (β= .26, t= 6.74; p<.01) independently and jointly [F(1,622)= 29.05; R.29, R2=.09; p<.01] influenced PTSD, and that substance use coping significantly mediated the relationship between combat exposure (β1= .136**, β2= .85*) as indicated by a significant reduction in the beta values. This shows that police personnel who experience combat and resort to substance use to cope are more vulnerable to PTSD. Thus, police authorities must restrain use of substance coping to reduce vulnerability to combat-related PTSD.","PeriodicalId":15532,"journal":{"name":"Journal of depression & anxiety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of depression & anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46527/2582-3264.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the years, studies have identified posttraumatic stress disorder as one of the greatest problems in military and police population worldwide. Apparently, extant literature have associated this problem with combat exposure; however, what is still unclear is whether adopting certain coping strategies like substance use after homecoming from combat deployment could increase vulnerability to combat-related PTSD especially among Nigerian police population that has been associated with high substance use coping. This study therefore examined the mediatory role of substance use coping in the relationship between combat exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder among Nigerian mobile police personnel exposed to BokoHaram insurgency in the North-eastern, Nigeria. Data were collected using standardized questionnaires on a sample of 630 participants. Two hypotheses were stated and analysed using Pearson correlation, linear and hierarchical multiple regression, and results revealed a significant positive relationship between combat exposure (r= .36; p<.01), substance use coping (r=.28; p<.01) and PTSD; as well as combat exposure and substance use(r= .19; p<.05). Additional findings indicated that combat exposure (β=.09, t= 2.2; p<.05) and substance use coping strategy (β= .26, t= 6.74; p<.01) independently and jointly [F(1,622)= 29.05; R.29, R2=.09; p<.01] influenced PTSD, and that substance use coping significantly mediated the relationship between combat exposure (β1= .136**, β2= .85*) as indicated by a significant reduction in the beta values. This shows that police personnel who experience combat and resort to substance use to cope are more vulnerable to PTSD. Thus, police authorities must restrain use of substance coping to reduce vulnerability to combat-related PTSD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物质使用应对在博科圣地暴乱事件中尼日利亚警察战斗暴露与创伤后应激障碍关系中的中介作用
多年来,研究已经确定创伤后应激障碍是世界范围内军队和警察人口中最大的问题之一。显然,现存文献将这一问题与战斗暴露联系在一起;然而,目前尚不清楚的是,从战斗部署回国后采取某些应对策略,如药物使用,是否会增加患与战斗相关的创伤后应激障碍的脆弱性,特别是在尼日利亚警察人群中,他们与高药物使用应对有关。因此,本研究考察了物质使用应对在尼日利亚东北部博科哈拉姆叛乱中暴露的尼日利亚机动警察人员的战斗暴露与创伤后应激障碍之间的关系中的中介作用。数据是通过对630名参与者的标准化问卷收集的。使用Pearson相关、线性和层次多元回归对两个假设进行了陈述和分析,结果显示,战斗暴露与健康水平之间存在显著的正相关关系(r= 0.36;P < 0.01),物质使用应对(r= 0.28;p< 0.01)和PTSD;以及战斗暴露和物质使用(r= 0.19;p < . 05)。其他研究结果表明,战斗暴露(β=。09, t= 2.2;P < 0.05)和物质使用应对策略(β= 0.26, t= 6.74;p< 0.01)独立和联合[F(1,622)= 29.05;R.29, R2 = .09点;p <。[01]影响创伤后应激障碍,物质使用应对显著介导战斗暴露之间的关系(β1= .136**, β2= .85*), β值显著降低。这表明,经历过战斗并求助于药物使用的警察人员更容易患创伤后应激障碍。因此,警察当局必须限制物质应对的使用,以减少与战斗有关的创伤后应激障碍的脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Treatment Utilization of Patients Diagnosed with Depression and Anxiety Disorders Based on Kentucky Medicaid 2012-2019 Datasets. The Association Between Gratitude and Depression: A Meta-Analysis Submission Anxiety: ORCID, Publons, Cabell's, APC, Index Factor, Open Access, "Predatory" and Wait Time (As Well as Other Things) The Role of Pets in the Mental Health Implications of the COVD-19 Pandemic Managing Anxiety and Stress Holistically: Vedic Wisdom from the Purna Health Management System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1