The state-trait model of cheerfulness and social desirability: an investigation on psychometric properties and links with well-being

C. Lau, Catherine Li, L. Quilty, D. Saklofske, Francesco Bruno, F. Chiesi
{"title":"The state-trait model of cheerfulness and social desirability: an investigation on psychometric properties and links with well-being","authors":"C. Lau, Catherine Li, L. Quilty, D. Saklofske, Francesco Bruno, F. Chiesi","doi":"10.1515/humor-2023-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ruch and colleagues (Ruch, Willibald, Gabriele Köhler & Christoph Van Thriel. 1996. Assessing the “humorous temperament”: Construction of the facet and standard trait forms of the state-trait-cheerfulness-inventory — STCI. Humor 9(3–4). 303–340) postulated high cheerfulness, low seriousness, and low bad mood contribute to exhilaration and enjoyment of humor. Although robust findings have corroborated that cheerfulness is associated with well-being and greatly enhances one’s social desirability, no studies have investigated the effects of social desirability on the assessment of cheerfulness. For this study, 997 undergraduate students completed the State-Trait Cheerfulness Inventory (STCI) and validity measures. Exploratory factor analyses that controlled for social desirability suggest several items on the STCI cheerfulness subscale loaded on social desirability, whereas seriousness subscale items showed few positive loadings on social desirability and bad mood subscale items loaded negatively on social desirability. Despite associations with social desirability, items overall showed strong loadings onto their respective factors. Factor loadings free of social desirability ranged from 0.39 to 0.84 in cheerfulness, 0.49 to 0.76 in seriousness, and 0.50 to 0.81 in bad mood. Cheerfulness, seriousness, and bad mood subscale scores demonstrated partial correlations in the expected directions with well-being when controlling for social desirability, albeit smaller in size but not significantly different. The STCI scores demonstrated strong psychometric properties with good reliability, structural validity, and criterion validity when controlling for social desirability.","PeriodicalId":73268,"journal":{"name":"Humor (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"136 1","pages":"263 - 280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humor (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2023-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Ruch and colleagues (Ruch, Willibald, Gabriele Köhler & Christoph Van Thriel. 1996. Assessing the “humorous temperament”: Construction of the facet and standard trait forms of the state-trait-cheerfulness-inventory — STCI. Humor 9(3–4). 303–340) postulated high cheerfulness, low seriousness, and low bad mood contribute to exhilaration and enjoyment of humor. Although robust findings have corroborated that cheerfulness is associated with well-being and greatly enhances one’s social desirability, no studies have investigated the effects of social desirability on the assessment of cheerfulness. For this study, 997 undergraduate students completed the State-Trait Cheerfulness Inventory (STCI) and validity measures. Exploratory factor analyses that controlled for social desirability suggest several items on the STCI cheerfulness subscale loaded on social desirability, whereas seriousness subscale items showed few positive loadings on social desirability and bad mood subscale items loaded negatively on social desirability. Despite associations with social desirability, items overall showed strong loadings onto their respective factors. Factor loadings free of social desirability ranged from 0.39 to 0.84 in cheerfulness, 0.49 to 0.76 in seriousness, and 0.50 to 0.81 in bad mood. Cheerfulness, seriousness, and bad mood subscale scores demonstrated partial correlations in the expected directions with well-being when controlling for social desirability, albeit smaller in size but not significantly different. The STCI scores demonstrated strong psychometric properties with good reliability, structural validity, and criterion validity when controlling for social desirability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快乐与社会渴望的状态-特质模型:心理测量特征及其与幸福感的关系研究
Ruch及其同事(Ruch, Willibald, Gabriele Köhler & Christoph Van Thriel. 1996)。“幽默气质”的评估:状态-特质-愉悦-量表的面形和标准特质形式的构建。幽默9(3 - 4)。(303-340)假定高度愉快、低严肃和低坏心情有助于愉快和享受幽默。尽管强有力的研究结果已经证实,快乐与幸福有关,并大大提高了一个人的社会受欢迎程度,但还没有研究调查社会受欢迎程度对快乐程度评估的影响。本研究对997名大学生进行了状态-特质快乐量表(STCI)和效度测量。控制了社会期望的探索性因素分析表明,STCI快乐子量表中有几个项目对社会期望有正向负荷,而严肃子量表中有几个项目对社会期望有正向负荷,而坏情绪子量表中有几个项目对社会期望有负向负荷。尽管与社会可取性有关,但项目总体上显示出对各自因素的强烈负荷。不受社会期望影响的因素负荷在快乐方面为0.39至0.84,严肃方面为0.49至0.76,坏心情方面为0.50至0.81。当控制社会期望时,快乐、严肃和坏情绪子量表得分在预期方向上显示出与幸福感的部分相关性,尽管规模较小,但差异并不显著。在控制社会期望时,STCI分数具有良好的信度、结构效度和标准效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Banter as transformative practice: linguistic play and joking relationships in a UK swimming club. A general mechanism of humor: reformulating the semantic overlap The Humor Styles Questionnaire: a critique of scale construct validity and recommendations regarding individual differences in style profiles Jennifer Caplan (2023). Funny, you don’t look funny: Judaism and humor from the silent generation to millennials Villy Tsakona (2020). Recontextualising humour. rethinking the analysis and teaching of humor. De Gruyter Mouton, 229 pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1