Trans Aesthetics and Similes of Oppression

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1215/23289252-9008982
Shaedyn Miller
{"title":"Trans Aesthetics and Similes of Oppression","authors":"Shaedyn Miller","doi":"10.1215/23289252-9008982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Because we live in a cisnormative society, trans inclusion is often filtered through cis subjectivities, allowing real or potential allies to “make sense” of transness without decentering their own experiences. This article investigates these dynamics through analysis of “trans aesthetics”—the symbols, language, and cultural meanings stereotypically associated with transness—when used by cisgender queer college students to signal trans-inclusive investments and forge solidarity with trans peers. This study examines three deployments of trans aesthetics: 1) using queer to signal trans-inclusive identities and community, 2) routinizing pronoun introductions, and 3) formulating “similes of oppression” that link trans and cisgender queer people's experiences of heterosexism. While potentiating opportunities for trans solidarity and inclusion, these practices simultaneously reinscribe cisnormative understandings and articulations of gender by empowering cisgender students to filter transness through their own lenses, and to construct hybrid cis subjectivities in the process. Ultimately, this research extends trans and critical allyship studies through empirical analysis of how cisnormativity infuses ostensibly trans-inclusive discourses.","PeriodicalId":44767,"journal":{"name":"TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-9008982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because we live in a cisnormative society, trans inclusion is often filtered through cis subjectivities, allowing real or potential allies to “make sense” of transness without decentering their own experiences. This article investigates these dynamics through analysis of “trans aesthetics”—the symbols, language, and cultural meanings stereotypically associated with transness—when used by cisgender queer college students to signal trans-inclusive investments and forge solidarity with trans peers. This study examines three deployments of trans aesthetics: 1) using queer to signal trans-inclusive identities and community, 2) routinizing pronoun introductions, and 3) formulating “similes of oppression” that link trans and cisgender queer people's experiences of heterosexism. While potentiating opportunities for trans solidarity and inclusion, these practices simultaneously reinscribe cisnormative understandings and articulations of gender by empowering cisgender students to filter transness through their own lenses, and to construct hybrid cis subjectivities in the process. Ultimately, this research extends trans and critical allyship studies through empirical analysis of how cisnormativity infuses ostensibly trans-inclusive discourses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨美学与压迫的明喻
因为我们生活在一个顺性规范的社会中,跨性别包容通常是通过顺性主体性过滤的,允许真正的或潜在的盟友在不偏离自己经历的情况下“理解”跨性别。本文通过分析“跨性别美学”(与跨性别相关的符号、语言和文化意义)来研究这些动态,当顺性酷儿大学生使用“跨性别美学”来表明跨性别包容性投资并与跨性别同龄人建立团结时。本研究考察了跨性别美学的三种部署:1)使用酷儿来表示跨性别包容的身份和社区,2)将代词引入常规化,以及3)形成“压迫的比喻”,将跨性别和顺性酷儿人群对异性恋的经历联系起来。在增强跨性别团结和包容的机会的同时,这些实践同时通过赋予顺性学生通过自己的镜头过滤跨性别,并在此过程中构建混合的顺性主体性,重新定义了对性别的顺性规范理解和表达。最后,本研究通过对顺规范性如何注入表面上的跨包容性话语的实证分析,扩展了跨和批判性盟友关系的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly
TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
28.60%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Provincializing Trans Studies Staying Backward with the History of Camptown Trans Sex Work “For All the Queer NDN Foster Kids Out There” Whither Trans Studies? Jugando con lenguaje
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1