Real-world efficacy and problems of once-daily use of inhaled steroid (fluticasone furoate) combined with long-acting beta-2 agonist (vilanterol) in Japanese patients with asthma

A. Umeda, T. Yamane, T. Mochizuki, Yasushi Inoue, K. Tsushima, K. Miyagawa, Atsumi Mochida, H. Takeda, Y. Okada, K. Fukunaga
{"title":"Real-world efficacy and problems of once-daily use of inhaled steroid (fluticasone furoate) combined with long-acting beta-2 agonist (vilanterol) in Japanese patients with asthma","authors":"A. Umeda, T. Yamane, T. Mochizuki, Yasushi Inoue, K. Tsushima, K. Miyagawa, Atsumi Mochida, H. Takeda, Y. Okada, K. Fukunaga","doi":"10.1080/2331205X.2019.1600632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: The Japanese drug use system allowed the “once-daily use” of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) fluticasone furoate (FF) combined with a long acting beta-2 agonist (LABA) vilanterol (VI) against asthma for the first time in 2013. Until then, patients with asthma had to use ICS at least twice-daily. We investigated the real-world efficacy and problems of this drug (FF/VI). Methods: This was an open-label, uncontrolled, within-group time-series (before-after) design. Prior treatments of asthma (twice-daily use of ICS with or without LABA) were switched to once-daily use of FF/VI (200 μg/25 μg). Subjects were evaluated by lung function tests prior to, and 2–3 months after, the initiation of FF/VI. Questions on the asthma control test (ACT) and preference of drugs were asked to patients. Results: One hundred and twenty-eight Japanese asthma outpatients were enrolled from 2014–2018 and 107 subjects completed the study. Peak flow, instantaneous flow at 75% of the forced vital capacity (V75), V50, maximum mid-expiratory flow rate, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and ACT score in FF/VI-using subjects were significantly increased (all p < 0.01). The percent predicted vital capacity and the inspiratory reserve volume were also increased significantly (all 0.01 < p < 0.05). Ninety-three percent of subjects declared they wanted to continue FF/VI in the future. Adverse effects including hoarseness and/or uncomfortable sensations in the throat were increased (16%). Conclusions: Once-daily use of FF/VI is a potent and effective treatment. Its effect was marked on larger airways and yielded a greater satisfaction in patients despite a higher incidence of local steroid effects.","PeriodicalId":10470,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Medicine","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2019.1600632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The Japanese drug use system allowed the “once-daily use” of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) fluticasone furoate (FF) combined with a long acting beta-2 agonist (LABA) vilanterol (VI) against asthma for the first time in 2013. Until then, patients with asthma had to use ICS at least twice-daily. We investigated the real-world efficacy and problems of this drug (FF/VI). Methods: This was an open-label, uncontrolled, within-group time-series (before-after) design. Prior treatments of asthma (twice-daily use of ICS with or without LABA) were switched to once-daily use of FF/VI (200 μg/25 μg). Subjects were evaluated by lung function tests prior to, and 2–3 months after, the initiation of FF/VI. Questions on the asthma control test (ACT) and preference of drugs were asked to patients. Results: One hundred and twenty-eight Japanese asthma outpatients were enrolled from 2014–2018 and 107 subjects completed the study. Peak flow, instantaneous flow at 75% of the forced vital capacity (V75), V50, maximum mid-expiratory flow rate, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and ACT score in FF/VI-using subjects were significantly increased (all p < 0.01). The percent predicted vital capacity and the inspiratory reserve volume were also increased significantly (all 0.01 < p < 0.05). Ninety-three percent of subjects declared they wanted to continue FF/VI in the future. Adverse effects including hoarseness and/or uncomfortable sensations in the throat were increased (16%). Conclusions: Once-daily use of FF/VI is a potent and effective treatment. Its effect was marked on larger airways and yielded a greater satisfaction in patients despite a higher incidence of local steroid effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每日一次吸入类固醇(糠酸氟替卡松)联合长效β -2激动剂(维兰特罗)在日本哮喘患者中的实际疗效和问题
摘要目的:2013年,日本药品使用系统首次允许吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)糠酸氟替卡松(FF)联合长效β -2激动剂(LABA)维兰特罗(VI)治疗哮喘。在此之前,哮喘患者必须每天至少使用两次ICS。我们调查了该药物(FF/VI)的实际疗效和存在的问题。方法:采用开放标签、非对照、组内时间序列(前后对照)设计。先前的哮喘治疗(每日两次使用ICS合并或不使用LABA)改为每日一次使用FF/VI (200 μg/25 μg)。受试者在FF/VI开始前和开始后2-3个月通过肺功能测试进行评估。向患者询问有关哮喘控制试验(ACT)和药物偏好的问题。结果:2014-2018年共有128名日本哮喘门诊患者入组,107名受试者完成了研究。FF/ vi组的峰值流量、75%用力肺活量瞬时流量(V75)、V50、最大呼气中流量、1 s用力呼气量、ACT评分均显著升高(p < 0.01)。肺活量和吸气储备量的预测值也显著提高(均0.01 < p < 0.05)。93%的受试者表示他们想在未来继续FF/VI。不良反应包括声音嘶哑和/或喉咙不适的感觉增加(16%)。结论:每日一次使用FF/VI是一种有效的治疗方法。它的效果在较大的气道上是显著的,尽管局部类固醇效应的发生率较高,但患者的满意度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with uptake of community client-led ART delivery model at Mulago adult HIV clinic _ Mulago National Referral Hospital Malaria interventions and control programes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A narrative review Quantitative assessment of specific serum IgGs may verify source of environmental exposure in extrinsic allergic alveolitis (EAA) Divergence in fertility levels and patterns of muslim-majority countries of maghreb and middle/West Africa Exploration of how to make the collaborative planning process work - a grounded theory study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1