The impact of application mode of three universal adhesives with different chemical compositions and curing techniques on their micro shear bond strength to dentin

M. Kamel, Mennatallah Mehena, Z. Soliman
{"title":"The impact of application mode of three universal adhesives with different chemical compositions and curing techniques on their micro shear bond strength to dentin","authors":"M. Kamel, Mennatallah Mehena, Z. Soliman","doi":"10.21608/edj.2022.161374.2249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement of problem: Different types of universal adhesives with different curing techniques are present in the market. The effect of their application modes on their performance is still unknown. Objectives: To test three universal adhesives with different curing techniques and their bonding ability to dentin when applied in different application modes. Methods: Self cure Palfique Universal Bond (PUB), light cure One Coat 7 Universal Bond (1C) with and without One Coat 7.0 Activator (+/- SCA) and light cure All-bond universal (ABU) and Filtek supreme flowable composite were used. The three adhesives were used in etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) mode to bovine dentin. Microshear bond strength (SBS) was tested. For each group 3 teeth were prepared with 15 Microshear bond specimens. Data was collected and analyzed using R statistical analysis software version 4.1.3 for Windows. Results: Among groups, 1C showed the highest SBS values irrespective to application mode while PUB showed lower SBS in both modes compared to other used adhesives. In the ER mode only, PUB showed significantly lower SBS values compared to other tested adhesives, no significant differences were present between the 1C +/- SCA and ABU. In SE, both 1C + SCA and PBU presented significantly lower SBS compared with other groups, while 1C showed significant higher SBS. Conclusions: All adhesives performed better in ER mode compared to SE mode except for PUB. Significance: ER mode did not negatively affect the bonding performance to dentin and the variation of results in both application modes was adhesive dependent.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2022.161374.2249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Statement of problem: Different types of universal adhesives with different curing techniques are present in the market. The effect of their application modes on their performance is still unknown. Objectives: To test three universal adhesives with different curing techniques and their bonding ability to dentin when applied in different application modes. Methods: Self cure Palfique Universal Bond (PUB), light cure One Coat 7 Universal Bond (1C) with and without One Coat 7.0 Activator (+/- SCA) and light cure All-bond universal (ABU) and Filtek supreme flowable composite were used. The three adhesives were used in etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) mode to bovine dentin. Microshear bond strength (SBS) was tested. For each group 3 teeth were prepared with 15 Microshear bond specimens. Data was collected and analyzed using R statistical analysis software version 4.1.3 for Windows. Results: Among groups, 1C showed the highest SBS values irrespective to application mode while PUB showed lower SBS in both modes compared to other used adhesives. In the ER mode only, PUB showed significantly lower SBS values compared to other tested adhesives, no significant differences were present between the 1C +/- SCA and ABU. In SE, both 1C + SCA and PBU presented significantly lower SBS compared with other groups, while 1C showed significant higher SBS. Conclusions: All adhesives performed better in ER mode compared to SE mode except for PUB. Significance: ER mode did not negatively affect the bonding performance to dentin and the variation of results in both application modes was adhesive dependent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究了三种不同化学成分和固化工艺的通用胶粘剂的应用方式对其与牙本质微剪切结合强度的影响
问题陈述:市场上有不同类型的通用胶粘剂和不同的固化技术。它们的应用模式对其性能的影响尚不清楚。目的:测试三种不同固化工艺的通用胶粘剂在不同使用方式下对牙本质的粘接能力。方法:采用自固化Palfique万能粘结剂(PUB)、光固化One Coat 7万能粘结剂(1C)(含或不含One Coat 7.0活化剂(+/- SCA)、光固化All-bond万能粘结剂(ABU)和Filtek超级可流动复合材料。将这三种胶粘剂分别用于牛牙本质的蚀刻-冲洗(ER)和自蚀刻(SE)模式。测试了微剪切粘结强度(SBS)。每组制备3颗牙,15个微剪切粘结试件。采用R统计分析软件4.1.3版本进行数据收集和分析。结果:在不同的使用方式下,1C的SBS值最高,而PUB在两种使用方式下的SBS值均低于其他使用的粘合剂。仅在ER模式下,PUB的SBS值明显低于其他测试粘合剂,1C +/- SCA与ABU之间无显著差异。在SE组中,1C + SCA和PBU组的SBS均显著低于其他组,而1C组的SBS均显著高于其他组。结论:除PUB外,所有胶粘剂在ER模式下均优于SE模式。意义:ER模式对牙本质的粘接性能没有负面影响,两种应用模式的结果变化与粘接剂有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness Of Smartphone Application In Improving Oral Hygiene Compared To Oral Instructions In Patients With Plaque-induced Gingivitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Histopathological Evaluation of Cholecalciferol Overdose on Tongue Structure of Albino Rats (Immunohistochemical Study) EFFECT OF EXTERNAL COLD AND VIBRATION (BUZZY DEVICE) VERSUS THE CONVENTIONAL INJECTION TECHNIQUE ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING LOCAL ANESTHESIA ADMINSTRATION IN CHILDREN: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICALTRIAL STUDY Effect of Different In-Office Bleaching techniques on Enamel Color and Surface Roughness: In Vitro Study SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND COLOR STABILITY OF MILLED VERSUS 3D PRINTED INTERIM RESTORATION AFTER IMMERSION IN TWO PH MEDIA (IN VITRO STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1