Alternative Method for Pressure Transient Analysis

F. Franco, A. Rincón, M. Useche
{"title":"Alternative Method for Pressure Transient Analysis","authors":"F. Franco, A. Rincón, M. Useche","doi":"10.2118/193261-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An alternative method is presented for estimation of reservoir properties that are usually estimated in a classic buildup test are obtained using flowing conditions thereby eliminating the need for shut-in periods and measurement of static pressure data.\n The proposed approach is based on the effect of two consecutive periods of production with different rates in a single well-reservoir model. The well is initially produced at a constant rate until pseudo-steady state conditions are reached, followed by a different rate that will generate a pressure transient response measured at bottom of the wellbore. A mathematical formulation is applied to estimate the reservoir pressure as function of radius of investigation, which is equal to the bottom hole pressure observed during a shut-in buildup test.\n A single well-reservoir model with known petrophysical parameters, fluid properties, pressure and temperature is used as a reference to evaluate the proposed methodology. The reservoir (i.e. the simulation model) is tested by applying two methods: the first one, is the simulation of a classic buildup test, and the second one, is the simulation of two flow rates periods according to the new theory; the results are compared with the model of reference, calculating percentage of error for permeability, skin, and average reservoir pressure. Additionally, it is demonstrated that a shut-in period is not required to obtain data equivalent to a classic buildup test since it is possible to calculate it from dynamic behavior.\n The ability to complete a well pressure transient analysis test from flowing conditions and provide valid and reliable results has a direct impact in reduction of cost and deferred production for companies involved in oil and gas operations.","PeriodicalId":11208,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193261-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An alternative method is presented for estimation of reservoir properties that are usually estimated in a classic buildup test are obtained using flowing conditions thereby eliminating the need for shut-in periods and measurement of static pressure data. The proposed approach is based on the effect of two consecutive periods of production with different rates in a single well-reservoir model. The well is initially produced at a constant rate until pseudo-steady state conditions are reached, followed by a different rate that will generate a pressure transient response measured at bottom of the wellbore. A mathematical formulation is applied to estimate the reservoir pressure as function of radius of investigation, which is equal to the bottom hole pressure observed during a shut-in buildup test. A single well-reservoir model with known petrophysical parameters, fluid properties, pressure and temperature is used as a reference to evaluate the proposed methodology. The reservoir (i.e. the simulation model) is tested by applying two methods: the first one, is the simulation of a classic buildup test, and the second one, is the simulation of two flow rates periods according to the new theory; the results are compared with the model of reference, calculating percentage of error for permeability, skin, and average reservoir pressure. Additionally, it is demonstrated that a shut-in period is not required to obtain data equivalent to a classic buildup test since it is possible to calculate it from dynamic behavior. The ability to complete a well pressure transient analysis test from flowing conditions and provide valid and reliable results has a direct impact in reduction of cost and deferred production for companies involved in oil and gas operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压力瞬态分析的替代方法
本文提出了一种可替代的储层性质估计方法,这种方法通常是通过使用流动条件来估计的,从而消除了关井期和静压数据测量的需要。所提出的方法是基于在单井-油藏模型中以不同速率连续两期生产的影响。该井最初以恒定速率生产,直到达到准稳态条件,然后以不同的速率生产,从而在井筒底部测量压力瞬态响应。应用数学公式来估计油藏压力作为研究半径的函数,其等于关井建井测试中观察到的井底压力。以已知岩石物理参数、流体性质、压力和温度的单井-储层模型为参考,对所提出的方法进行了评价。采用两种方法对储层(即模拟模型)进行测试:第一种方法是模拟经典堆积试验,第二种方法是根据新理论模拟两个流量周期;结果与参考模型进行了比较,计算了渗透率、表皮和平均储层压力的误差百分比。此外,由于可以根据动态特性计算数据,因此不需要关井时间来获得与经典累积测试等效的数据。能够根据流动状况完成井压瞬态分析测试,并提供有效可靠的结果,对油气公司降低成本和推迟生产具有直接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Crisis as Source of Innovation Strategy at ADNOC LNG Successful Implementation of Torque and Drag Management Techniques in High Departure Wells is the Key to Safely Reach Wells Planned Total Depth in Offshore Artificial Islands Efficiency, Economics and Compliance: A Practical Planning Tool for Optimizing Cuttings Treatment First Cross-Dipole Shear Wave Imaging Application for Intersecting a Mother Open-Hole from a Near-Parallel Side-Track Wellbore Effect of Drilling Muds Wall Slip on Reliable Frictional Pressure Loss Estimations in Offshore Drilling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1