Deep Sternal Wound Infection after Open-Heart Surgery: A 13-Year Single Institution Analysis.

A. A. Juhl, Sofie Hody, T. S. Videbaek, T. Damsgaard, P. Nielsen
{"title":"Deep Sternal Wound Infection after Open-Heart Surgery: A 13-Year Single Institution Analysis.","authors":"A. A. Juhl, Sofie Hody, T. S. Videbaek, T. Damsgaard, P. Nielsen","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThe present study aimed to compare the clinical outcome for patients with or without muscle flap reconstruction after deep sternal wound infection due to open-heart surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe study was a retrospective cohort study, including patients who developed deep sternal wound infection after open-heart surgery in the Western Denmark Region from 1999 to 2011. Journals of included patients were reviewed for clinical data regarding the treatment of their sternal defect. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received a muscle-flap-based sternal reconstruction or traditional rewiring of the sternum.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 130 patients developed deep sternal wound infection in the study period. In all, 12 patients died before being discharged, leaving a total of 118 patients for analysis. Of these, 50 (42%) patients received muscle flap reconstruction. Muscle flap recipients had significantly longer total hospital stays (p <0.001). However, after receiving muscle flap reconstruction, patients were discharged after a median of 14 days, with 74% not needing additional surgery.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nIt is difficult to predict which patients eventually require muscle flap reconstruction after deep sternal wound infection. Although patients receiving muscle flap reconstructions have longer hospital stays, they are quickly discharged after the reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

PURPOSE The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcome for patients with or without muscle flap reconstruction after deep sternal wound infection due to open-heart surgery. METHODS The study was a retrospective cohort study, including patients who developed deep sternal wound infection after open-heart surgery in the Western Denmark Region from 1999 to 2011. Journals of included patients were reviewed for clinical data regarding the treatment of their sternal defect. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received a muscle-flap-based sternal reconstruction or traditional rewiring of the sternum. RESULTS A total of 130 patients developed deep sternal wound infection in the study period. In all, 12 patients died before being discharged, leaving a total of 118 patients for analysis. Of these, 50 (42%) patients received muscle flap reconstruction. Muscle flap recipients had significantly longer total hospital stays (p <0.001). However, after receiving muscle flap reconstruction, patients were discharged after a median of 14 days, with 74% not needing additional surgery. CONCLUSION It is difficult to predict which patients eventually require muscle flap reconstruction after deep sternal wound infection. Although patients receiving muscle flap reconstructions have longer hospital stays, they are quickly discharged after the reconstruction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心内直视手术后深胸骨伤口感染:13年单一机构分析。
目的比较心内直视手术后胸骨深部伤口感染行或不行肌肉瓣重建的临床效果。方法本研究为回顾性队列研究,纳入1999 - 2011年西丹麦地区心内直视手术后发生胸骨深部伤口感染的患者。纳入的患者的期刊回顾临床资料有关治疗他们的胸骨缺损。病人被分为两组,这取决于他们是否接受了基于肌肉瓣的胸骨重建或传统的胸骨重新布线。结果研究期间共有130例患者发生胸骨深部伤口感染。总共有12名患者在出院前死亡,总共有118名患者需要分析。其中,50例(42%)患者接受了肌瓣重建。肌肉瓣接受者的总住院时间明显延长(p <0.001)。然而,接受肌肉瓣重建后,患者平均14天后出院,74%的患者不需要额外的手术。结论胸骨深创面感染后哪些患者最终需要肌皮瓣重建难以预测。虽然接受肌瓣重建的患者住院时间较长,但重建后很快出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lateral Dorsal Basal Lung Resection Based on Functional Preserving Sublobectomy Method: Single-Center Experience. A Novel Method of Real-Time Assessment for Coronary Artery Anastomosis Skill. Can Open Distal Repair Be Safely Used in All Patients with Type A Acute Aortic Dissection? Long-Term Outcomes of Simple Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Based on the Initial Aortic Diameter. Total Arterial Revascularization: Evaluating the Length of the Radial Artery in a Composite Graft Configuration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1