Four Hooves and a Horn: How (Not) to Poison Alexander the Great

IF 0.1 0 CLASSICS Philologia Classica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21638/spbu20.2022.206
Isidora Tolić
{"title":"Four Hooves and a Horn: How (Not) to Poison Alexander the Great","authors":"Isidora Tolić","doi":"10.21638/spbu20.2022.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several ancient authors tell a puzzling story of treason to murder Alexander the Great by presenting him with poison or poisonous water carried in a curious vessel — a hoof of a horse, a mule, or an ass. Porphyry of Tyre, citing Kallimachos and Philo the Paradoxographer, gives us a reason to believe that the mention of hoof-made vessels was a misinterpretation of hornmade chalices, or put otherwise, drinking horns. Presuming that the vessel in question indeed was a drinking horn, we are left with an unusual image — Alexander the Great perished after drinking the poisonous water from the horn of a hornless animal. We can look into the development of this legend and propose its origins by examining mutual features of two distinct traditions — the Greek legend of the river Styx and its lethal streams and the Indo-Iranian tradition of several miraculous features of a unicorn’s horn, attested in Iranian, Indian, and Greek sources. After the survey of relevant sources, we see that the horn from Philo’s story represented a legendary present of Indian rulers intended to save Alexander the Great from harm. Various layers of misapprehension transformed the legendary gift into a device contracted to harm him. This way, the author demonstrates two points: 1) that the story told by Porphyry in Styg. 375F is a part of an Indo-Iranian tradition about unicorns and their miraculous features; and 2) that the legend of Alexander’s poisoning represents a transformed and misinterpreted story of Alexander’s grandest gift.","PeriodicalId":40525,"journal":{"name":"Philologia Classica","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philologia Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2022.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several ancient authors tell a puzzling story of treason to murder Alexander the Great by presenting him with poison or poisonous water carried in a curious vessel — a hoof of a horse, a mule, or an ass. Porphyry of Tyre, citing Kallimachos and Philo the Paradoxographer, gives us a reason to believe that the mention of hoof-made vessels was a misinterpretation of hornmade chalices, or put otherwise, drinking horns. Presuming that the vessel in question indeed was a drinking horn, we are left with an unusual image — Alexander the Great perished after drinking the poisonous water from the horn of a hornless animal. We can look into the development of this legend and propose its origins by examining mutual features of two distinct traditions — the Greek legend of the river Styx and its lethal streams and the Indo-Iranian tradition of several miraculous features of a unicorn’s horn, attested in Iranian, Indian, and Greek sources. After the survey of relevant sources, we see that the horn from Philo’s story represented a legendary present of Indian rulers intended to save Alexander the Great from harm. Various layers of misapprehension transformed the legendary gift into a device contracted to harm him. This way, the author demonstrates two points: 1) that the story told by Porphyry in Styg. 375F is a part of an Indo-Iranian tradition about unicorns and their miraculous features; and 2) that the legend of Alexander’s poisoning represents a transformed and misinterpreted story of Alexander’s grandest gift.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《四只蹄和一只角:如何(不)毒害亚历山大大帝
几位古代作家讲述了一个令人费解的叛国故事,他们用一种奇怪的容器——一种马的蹄子、一种骡子的蹄子或一种驴的蹄子——把毒药或有毒的水献给亚历山大大帝,以此来谋杀他。提尔的波菲利引用卡利马科斯和悖论家菲洛的话,让我们有理由相信,提到蹄子制成的容器是对角制圣杯的误解,或者换句话说,是对喝角的误解。假设这艘船确实是一只喝水的角,我们就会看到一个不寻常的画面——亚历山大大帝在喝了一只没有角的动物角里的毒水后死去了。我们可以通过研究两种不同传统的共同特征来研究这个传说的发展,并提出它的起源——希腊关于冥河及其致命溪流的传说,以及印度-伊朗关于独角兽角的几个神奇特征的传说,这些传说在伊朗、印度和希腊的来源中得到证实。通过对相关资料的调查,我们发现菲洛故事中的号角代表了印度统治者为拯救亚历山大大帝而赠送的传奇礼物。层层的误解把这个传说中的礼物变成了一个用来伤害他的装置。通过这种方式,作者论证了两点:1)《Styg. 375F》中斑菲利讲述的故事是印度-伊朗关于独角兽及其神奇特征的传统的一部分;2)亚历山大中毒的传说代表了亚历山大最伟大的礼物的一个转变和误解的故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Aesthetic Paradigms of the Sacred in Contemporary Bessarabian Poetry Metonymization Procedures in Artificial Intelligence (in English and Romanian Languages) The Archetypal Meaning of the Mythical Child from the Short Story Epic “Luiza Textoris” – from Dreams of Flight to Exploring the Unconscious Abyss Substrate Words Examined from the Perspective of Linguistic Geography (III)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1