Public Interest in Cartelization: A Factor to Develop in Regulating Anti-Competitive Practices in India

Tejas Hinder, Ashutosh Kumar Singh, G. Singh
{"title":"Public Interest in Cartelization: A Factor to Develop in Regulating Anti-Competitive Practices in India","authors":"Tejas Hinder, Ashutosh Kumar Singh, G. Singh","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3758954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Owing to the extensive harm that cartels could potentially cause and create to the economies at national and international levels as well as to the consumers, they become concerns that need to be addressed extensively in relation to the interest of the public. \n \nThere are multiple factors that have to be taken into account in the study of public interest surrounding cartels, which include, recognition of a target base of consumers, the impact of enforcement action on them in the surrounding legal scenario, and the extent of corrigibility of the actions against the cartel operators, alleged in cases of violation of the aforesaid legal scenario. In determining each of the aforementioned factors prior to the setting up or institutionalization of a cartel, it is imperative to keep the nature of practice within the limits of what is legally construed as a competitive practice, and in exercise of legal due diligence, look into the potential level of consumer detriment, the existing market scenario as well as the priority of the prevailing nature of market, and the actual resources present for investigation of the cartel. \n \nAnalysing the aforementioned issues in India, this paper, through a critical analysis of the relevant provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter “the Act”), covers issues that arise in light of public interest and its consideration, in the process of cartelization. The authors base their comment on insufficiency of the provisions of the Act to meet the issues of public interest through a detailed analysis of the interplay between consumer benefits and high level of competition between market participants operating on the same relevant market. In doing so, the authors look into adherence to competition policies and the welfare of the consumers. In addition to this, the authors attempt to explore the issue of emergency cartelisation, and bring out the need for its statutory inclusivity.","PeriodicalId":11797,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3758954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Owing to the extensive harm that cartels could potentially cause and create to the economies at national and international levels as well as to the consumers, they become concerns that need to be addressed extensively in relation to the interest of the public. There are multiple factors that have to be taken into account in the study of public interest surrounding cartels, which include, recognition of a target base of consumers, the impact of enforcement action on them in the surrounding legal scenario, and the extent of corrigibility of the actions against the cartel operators, alleged in cases of violation of the aforesaid legal scenario. In determining each of the aforementioned factors prior to the setting up or institutionalization of a cartel, it is imperative to keep the nature of practice within the limits of what is legally construed as a competitive practice, and in exercise of legal due diligence, look into the potential level of consumer detriment, the existing market scenario as well as the priority of the prevailing nature of market, and the actual resources present for investigation of the cartel. Analysing the aforementioned issues in India, this paper, through a critical analysis of the relevant provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter “the Act”), covers issues that arise in light of public interest and its consideration, in the process of cartelization. The authors base their comment on insufficiency of the provisions of the Act to meet the issues of public interest through a detailed analysis of the interplay between consumer benefits and high level of competition between market participants operating on the same relevant market. In doing so, the authors look into adherence to competition policies and the welfare of the consumers. In addition to this, the authors attempt to explore the issue of emergency cartelisation, and bring out the need for its statutory inclusivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡特尔化中的公共利益:印度监管反竞争行为的一个发展因素
由于卡特尔可能对国家和国际两级的经济以及消费者造成广泛的损害,它们成为需要从公众利益的角度广泛处理的问题。在研究围绕卡特尔的公共利益时,必须考虑多个因素,其中包括对目标消费者群体的认识,在周围的法律情景中对他们采取的执法行动的影响,以及在违反上述法律情景的情况下对卡特尔经营者采取的行动的可纠正程度。在决定之前所有上述因素设置或卡特尔的制度化,必须保持自然的实践范围内合法视为竞争实践,在行使法律尽职调查,调查消费者损害的潜在水平,现有的市场情况以及市场的普遍性质的优先级,以及欧佩克的实际资源现状进行调查。本文分析了印度的上述问题,通过对2002年《竞争法》(以下简称“该法”)相关条款的批判性分析,涵盖了在卡特尔化过程中根据公共利益及其考虑而产生的问题。作者通过对消费者利益与在同一相关市场上运作的市场参与者之间的高度竞争之间的相互作用的详细分析,将他们的评论建立在该法案的规定不足以满足公共利益问题的基础上。在此过程中,作者研究了对竞争政策和消费者福利的遵守情况。除此之外,作者还试图探讨紧急卡特尔化问题,并提出其法定包容性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sound GUPPI Safe Harbor: A Calibrated Unilateral Effects Screen for Horizontal Mergers with Differentiated Products Consolidation on Aisle Five: Effects of Mergers in Consumer Packaged Goods Optimal Exit Policy with Uncertain Demand Friends in High Places: Demand Spillovers and Competition on Digital Platforms The Ambiguous Competitive Effects of Passive Partial Forward Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1