Developing and Implementing a School-led Motor Intervention for Children with Handwriting Difficulties

Katy A. Shire, Jo M C Atkinson, Emily A. Williams, John P. Pickavance, S. Magallón, Liam J B Hill, Amanda H. Waterman, D. Sugden, M. Mon-Williams
{"title":"Developing and Implementing a School-led Motor Intervention for Children with Handwriting Difficulties","authors":"Katy A. Shire, Jo M C Atkinson, Emily A. Williams, John P. Pickavance, S. Magallón, Liam J B Hill, Amanda H. Waterman, D. Sugden, M. Mon-Williams","doi":"10.1080/19411243.2020.1837047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We describe the development of an evidence-based motor intervention and an implementation pilot study in ten primary schools, involving 515 children (4–11 years). ‘Helping Handwriting SHINE’ (HHS) is a novel, school-led, group-based handwriting intervention. Teaching staff delivered HHS and provided feedback through a questionnaire, reporting that: (i) the children found the tasks enjoyable; (ii) the background and booklet instructions were easy to understand, (iii) there was a need for more comprehensive staff training. The teaching staff made recommendations about session duration, group size, resource availability, and age differentiation of tasks. These suggestions are applicable to the development of any school-based group-led motor intervention, and we used this feedback to refine the HHS intervention. This study shows that implementing school-led motor interventions at scale is possible. Moreover, the work provides insights into the factors to consider when developing school-based motor interventions prior to conducting randomized controlled trials (RCT). The process outlined in this manuscript has led to an RCT to test the effectiveness of HHS within primary schools.","PeriodicalId":92676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","volume":"178 1","pages":"274 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2020.1837047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT We describe the development of an evidence-based motor intervention and an implementation pilot study in ten primary schools, involving 515 children (4–11 years). ‘Helping Handwriting SHINE’ (HHS) is a novel, school-led, group-based handwriting intervention. Teaching staff delivered HHS and provided feedback through a questionnaire, reporting that: (i) the children found the tasks enjoyable; (ii) the background and booklet instructions were easy to understand, (iii) there was a need for more comprehensive staff training. The teaching staff made recommendations about session duration, group size, resource availability, and age differentiation of tasks. These suggestions are applicable to the development of any school-based group-led motor intervention, and we used this feedback to refine the HHS intervention. This study shows that implementing school-led motor interventions at scale is possible. Moreover, the work provides insights into the factors to consider when developing school-based motor interventions prior to conducting randomized controlled trials (RCT). The process outlined in this manuscript has led to an RCT to test the effectiveness of HHS within primary schools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以学校为主导的书写困难儿童运动干预的发展与实施
我们描述了一项基于证据的运动干预的发展,并在10所小学进行了一项试点研究,涉及515名儿童(4-11岁)。“帮助书写发光”(HHS)是一个新颖的、学校主导的、以团体为基础的书写干预项目。教学人员通过问卷调查提供了HHS和反馈,报告说:(i)孩子们觉得任务很有趣;(二)背景资料和小册子说明容易理解;(三)需要对工作人员进行更全面的培训。教学人员就课程持续时间、小组规模、资源可用性和任务的年龄差异提出了建议。这些建议适用于任何以学校为基础的团体运动干预的发展,我们使用这些反馈来完善HHS干预。这项研究表明,大规模实施学校主导的运动干预是可能的。此外,这项工作还提供了在进行随机对照试验(RCT)之前开发基于学校的运动干预措施时需要考虑的因素。本手稿中概述的过程导致了一项随机对照试验,以测试卫生与健康服务在小学中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Let down by Low Expectations: A Qualitative Interview/participatory Photography Study of Feeding Problems in Autistic Children Executive Functioning in the Schools: Perspectives from Occupational Therapists Occupational therapy intervention to address handwriting deficit in elementary-aged school children: How to, how much, and how often? A scoping review A Pilot Study on Efficacy of a Play-Based Social Skills Training Group for First-Grade Elementary Children with Autism in Taiwan How can we evaluate collaborative practices in inclusive schools? Challenges and proposed solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1