Comparative Study between Intrapolyp Corticosteroid Injection and Oral Corticosteroid in Treatment of Allergic Nasal Polyposis

N. Abdelrahman, A. Abdelraheem, Rehab Abd El Hakim Amin, Mahmoud Khalefa
{"title":"Comparative Study between Intrapolyp Corticosteroid Injection and Oral Corticosteroid in Treatment of Allergic Nasal Polyposis","authors":"N. Abdelrahman, A. Abdelraheem, Rehab Abd El Hakim Amin, Mahmoud Khalefa","doi":"10.21608/svuijm.2023.195800.1540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background: Sino-nasal polyps can be treated medically (with systemic and local steroids) or surgically; but a lot of patients refuse surgical intervention or are contraindicated to use systemic steroids. Intra-polyp steroid injections have recently been utilized to deliver high concentrations of steroid directly into the nasal polyp while simultaneously shielding the patient from the systemic steroid side effects. Objectives: To assess the role and efficacy of intra-polyp injection of steroids in the management of allergic nasal polypi, as well as to compare these findings to those of oral steroid. Patients and methods : Our study involved sixty patients that attended the outpatient clinic of the ENT department at Qena University Hospital who diagnosed with allergic nasal polypi. Their ages ranged from 17 to 63 years. They were randomly divided into 2 groups (oral steroid and intra-polyp steroid injection) according to type of treatment, each consisting of 30 patients. Results : After treatment, both groups showed a statistically significant decrease in the Symptom Score, Polyp Score, and Lund-Mackay score (P <0.001), with a significant difference between them (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Intra-polyp injection of steroid appears to be a safe and effective treatment method for Sino- nasal polyposis, with results comparable to systemic corticosteroids.","PeriodicalId":34789,"journal":{"name":"SVU International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"235 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVU International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/svuijm.2023.195800.1540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Background: Sino-nasal polyps can be treated medically (with systemic and local steroids) or surgically; but a lot of patients refuse surgical intervention or are contraindicated to use systemic steroids. Intra-polyp steroid injections have recently been utilized to deliver high concentrations of steroid directly into the nasal polyp while simultaneously shielding the patient from the systemic steroid side effects. Objectives: To assess the role and efficacy of intra-polyp injection of steroids in the management of allergic nasal polypi, as well as to compare these findings to those of oral steroid. Patients and methods : Our study involved sixty patients that attended the outpatient clinic of the ENT department at Qena University Hospital who diagnosed with allergic nasal polypi. Their ages ranged from 17 to 63 years. They were randomly divided into 2 groups (oral steroid and intra-polyp steroid injection) according to type of treatment, each consisting of 30 patients. Results : After treatment, both groups showed a statistically significant decrease in the Symptom Score, Polyp Score, and Lund-Mackay score (P <0.001), with a significant difference between them (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Intra-polyp injection of steroid appears to be a safe and effective treatment method for Sino- nasal polyposis, with results comparable to systemic corticosteroids.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻息肉内注射皮质类固醇与口服皮质类固醇治疗变应性鼻息肉病的比较研究
背景:鼻息肉可以药物治疗(全身和局部类固醇)或手术治疗;但许多患者拒绝手术治疗或禁用全身性类固醇。息肉内类固醇注射最近被用于将高浓度类固醇直接注入鼻息肉,同时保护患者免受全身类固醇副作用的影响。目的:评价鼻息肉内注射类固醇治疗变应性鼻息肉的作用和疗效,并将其与口服类固醇治疗效果进行比较。患者和方法:我们的研究涉及60名在Qena大学医院耳鼻喉科门诊就诊的诊断为过敏性鼻息肉的患者。他们的年龄从17岁到63岁不等。按治疗方式随机分为口服类固醇和息肉内注射类固醇2组,每组30例。结果:治疗后,两组患者的症状评分、息肉评分、Lund-Mackay评分均降低,差异有统计学意义(P <0.001),两组间差异有统计学意义(P <0.001)。结论:鼻息肉内注射类固醇是一种安全有效的治疗鼻息肉病的方法,其效果与全身皮质类固醇相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and risk factors for fatigue among health care providers in Qena University Hospitals: A hospital based study Intraoperative Color Doppler assessment of hepatic vasculature integrity: A Case Report Psychosocial impact of COVID-19 in rising generation: An observational study from India Application of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Pulmonology: Current Scenario and Future Prospective Functional Impairment and Quality of Life of patients with Major Depressive Disorder in Euthymia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1