Discriminating factors in financial risk tolerance: investors' economic perspective

Biswajit Prasad Chhatoi, Munmun Mohanty
{"title":"Discriminating factors in financial risk tolerance: investors' economic perspective","authors":"Biswajit Prasad Chhatoi, Munmun Mohanty","doi":"10.1108/jeas-09-2022-0204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to identify the variables responsible for classifying the investors into risk takers (RT) and risk avoiders (RA) across their economic perspectives.Design/methodology/approachThe research offers a novel and unobtrusive measure of classifying investors into RT and RA based on a set of financial risk tolerance (FRT) questions. The authors have investigated the causes of discrimination across economic perspectives over a sample of 552 investors exposed to market risk.FindingsThe authors identify that out of the total of 11 risk assessment variables, only three are responsible for classifying investors into RA and RT. The variables are risk return trade-off, comfort level dealing with risk, and understanding short-term volatility. Financial literacy is considered as an emerging cause of discrimination. Further, the authors highlight the most striking finding to be the discriminating factors across wealth and source of income of the investors.Originality/valueExisting research on FRT can be loosely segregated into three groups: the relationship between an individual's financial and non-FRT, estimation of FRT score (FRTS), and perceived self-assessed FRTS. The current research roughly falls into the third category of study where the authors have not only studied the self-assessed risk tolerance but also evaluated the predictors. Most of the studies have focussed on estimating self-assessed FRT with the help of one direct question to the respondent. However, the uniqueness of this study is that the researchers have used an instrument comprising a series of direct and indirect questions that can easily estimate the self-assessed risk perception and also discriminate the role of the economic factors that have any impact on self-assessed FRTS.","PeriodicalId":44018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-09-2022-0204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to identify the variables responsible for classifying the investors into risk takers (RT) and risk avoiders (RA) across their economic perspectives.Design/methodology/approachThe research offers a novel and unobtrusive measure of classifying investors into RT and RA based on a set of financial risk tolerance (FRT) questions. The authors have investigated the causes of discrimination across economic perspectives over a sample of 552 investors exposed to market risk.FindingsThe authors identify that out of the total of 11 risk assessment variables, only three are responsible for classifying investors into RA and RT. The variables are risk return trade-off, comfort level dealing with risk, and understanding short-term volatility. Financial literacy is considered as an emerging cause of discrimination. Further, the authors highlight the most striking finding to be the discriminating factors across wealth and source of income of the investors.Originality/valueExisting research on FRT can be loosely segregated into three groups: the relationship between an individual's financial and non-FRT, estimation of FRT score (FRTS), and perceived self-assessed FRTS. The current research roughly falls into the third category of study where the authors have not only studied the self-assessed risk tolerance but also evaluated the predictors. Most of the studies have focussed on estimating self-assessed FRT with the help of one direct question to the respondent. However, the uniqueness of this study is that the researchers have used an instrument comprising a series of direct and indirect questions that can easily estimate the self-assessed risk perception and also discriminate the role of the economic factors that have any impact on self-assessed FRTS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融风险承受能力的判别因素:投资者的经济视角
目的本文旨在找出在经济视角上将投资者划分为风险承担者(RT)和风险规避者(RA)的变量。该研究提供了一种新颖而不引人注目的方法,根据一组金融风险承受能力(FRT)问题将投资者分为RT和RA。作者调查了552名面临市场风险的投资者的样本,从经济角度调查了歧视的原因。研究发现,在11个风险评估变量中,只有3个变量负责将投资者划分为RA和rt。这3个变量是风险回报权衡、处理风险的舒适度和对短期波动的理解。金融知识被认为是一个新兴的歧视原因。此外,作者强调了最引人注目的发现,即投资者的财富和收入来源之间的区别因素。原创性/价值现有的FRT研究可以大致分为三类:个人财务与非FRT之间的关系、FRT分数的估计(FRTS)和感知自我评估的FRTS。目前的研究大致属于第三类研究,作者不仅研究了自我评估的风险承受能力,还评估了预测因素。大多数研究都集中在通过向被调查者提出一个直接问题来估计自我评估的FRT。然而,本研究的独特之处在于,研究人员使用了一种由一系列直接和间接问题组成的工具,可以很容易地估计自评风险感知,也可以区分对自评FRTS有任何影响的经济因素的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
83
期刊最新文献
Understanding the impact of ethical leadership on followers' voice: mediation of moral identity and moderation of proactive personality Do agency costs and business risk affect the corporate sustainability–financial performance relationship? Investigating nostalgia’s influence on brand love Influence of governance indicators on public debt accumulation in Africa Analysing volatility patterns in emerging markets: symmetric or asymmetric models?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1