Set matrix theory as a physically motivated generalization of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Logique et Analyse Pub Date : 2012-02-09 DOI:10.2143/LEA.225.0.3011356
M. Cabbolet, H. Swart
{"title":"Set matrix theory as a physically motivated generalization of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory","authors":"M. Cabbolet, H. Swart","doi":"10.2143/LEA.225.0.3011356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the Elementary Process Theory (EPT) has been developed as a set of fundamental principles that might underlie a gravitational repulsion of matter and antimatter. This paper presents set matrix theory (SMT) as the foundation of the mathematicallogical framework in which the EPT has been formalized: it is, namely, objectionable to use Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF) as such. SMT is a generalization of ZF: whereas ZF uses only sets as primitive objects, in the framework of SMT nite matrices with set-valued entries are objects sui generis, with a 1 1 set matrix [x] being identical to the set x. It is proved that every set that can be constructed in ZF can also be constructed in SMT: as a mathematical foundation, SMT is thus not weaker than ZF. In addition, it is shown that SMT is more suitable than ZF for the intended application to physics. The conclusion is that SMT, contrary to ZF, is acceptable as the mathematical-logical foundation of the framework for physics that is determined by the EPT.","PeriodicalId":46471,"journal":{"name":"Logique et Analyse","volume":"36 1","pages":"59-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logique et Analyse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/LEA.225.0.3011356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Recently, the Elementary Process Theory (EPT) has been developed as a set of fundamental principles that might underlie a gravitational repulsion of matter and antimatter. This paper presents set matrix theory (SMT) as the foundation of the mathematicallogical framework in which the EPT has been formalized: it is, namely, objectionable to use Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF) as such. SMT is a generalization of ZF: whereas ZF uses only sets as primitive objects, in the framework of SMT nite matrices with set-valued entries are objects sui generis, with a 1 1 set matrix [x] being identical to the set x. It is proved that every set that can be constructed in ZF can also be constructed in SMT: as a mathematical foundation, SMT is thus not weaker than ZF. In addition, it is shown that SMT is more suitable than ZF for the intended application to physics. The conclusion is that SMT, contrary to ZF, is acceptable as the mathematical-logical foundation of the framework for physics that is determined by the EPT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集合矩阵理论作为Zermelo-Fraenkel集合理论的物理动机推广
最近,基本过程理论(EPT)已经发展成为一套基本原理,可能是物质和反物质引力排斥的基础。本文提出了集合矩阵理论(SMT)作为EPT形式化的数学框架的基础:即,使用Zermelo-Fraenkel集合理论(ZF)是令人反感的。SMT是ZF的推广:而ZF只使用集合作为原始对象,在SMT的框架中,具有集值项的矩阵是自属对象,具有1 1集合矩阵[x]与集合x相同。证明了每一个可以在ZF中构造的集合也可以在SMT中构造:作为数学基础,SMT并不弱于ZF。此外,还表明SMT比ZF更适合于预期的物理应用。结论是,与ZF相反,SMT可以作为由EPT决定的物理框架的数学逻辑基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Logique et Analyse
Logique et Analyse PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Logique et Analyse is the continuation of Bulletin Intérieur, which was published from 1954 on by the Belgian National Centre for Logical Investigation, and intended originally only as an internal publication of results for its members and collaborators. Since the start of the new series, in 1958, however, the journal has been open to external submissions (and subscriptions). Logique et Analyse itself subscribes to no particular logical or philosophical doctrine, and so is open to articles from all points of view, provided only that they concern the designated subject matter of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Some Logical Notations for Pragmatic Assertions On Linear Existential Graphs Regions of Force: Peirce, Frege, Carroll, and Bilateral Proof Trees What do we mean when we talk of object-language and metalanguage in the theory of natural languages? A Graphical Deep Inference System for Intuitionistic Logic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1