Management of Mercury Offshore for Onshore Production Facilities

Mohamed Sopiee Saaibon, Z. Kayat, Fatimah A Karim
{"title":"Management of Mercury Offshore for Onshore Production Facilities","authors":"Mohamed Sopiee Saaibon, Z. Kayat, Fatimah A Karim","doi":"10.4043/31465-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objective of this paper is to provide an approach in mitigating the adverse effects of mercury found in production fields which include the evaluation on the requirement for mercury treatment facility and suitable technology and best location for the production fields and onshore LNG facilities. The evaluation included assessment of pipeline integrity and managing unexpected increase in mercury content to ensure Mercury Removal Unit (MRU) is capable to treat the gas within the design specification\n The method includes mercury mapping and analysis of the results. Evaluation of technology and type at various streams in gas, condensate and water streams. There is no method to predict mercury production forecast and sizing cannot be based on one exploration well data only. Subsurface data might not be representative due to improper procedure, sampling, preservation and timing. Rigorous technology evaluation was evaluated for various mercury species covering its vulnerability to operations abnormalities such as entrainment of moisture, spikes of mercury content, changes to feed gas, hydrogen sulfide content, historical experience of mercury contamination and its impact to operations and performance of cryogenic systems and chemical injection for pipelines. Review of effectiveness of mercury removal technology for gas stream cover metal sulfide based adsorbent and metal oxide based with H2S in-situ sulfiding. In view that there is no proven technology for condensates stream, particulates mercury removal using filtration and hydrocyclones of the multiphase condensate /water and water streams were considered\n Mercury has exceeded downstream design specification and pose threats to existing LNG facilities aluminum cryogenic heat exchanger. Speciation, particle size distribution and the use of a practical size test rig on site, adsorbent -condensate compatibility test are approaches to determine the capacity of the MRU. Based on the selected technology, concepts were derived for gas and condensate to ascertain the feasibility of mercury removal, particulate filtration, mercury impact to pipeline integrity and the basis for the onshore mercury removal facility. This yielded seven (7) different concepts or options addressing both MRU gas and condensate either at offshore platform or onshore facilities. The concept select ascertained the optimum requirement to install the mercury removal unit onshore upstream of an Acid Gas Removal Unit in the LNG facilities. A two-stage filtration to remove mercury particulates above 1 micron was selected for offshore facility.\n Understanding the behaviour of mercury and the distribution tendencies into the various streams and factors that influence this distribution would provide insight on the integrity of production and pipeline system and management of mercury for operations.","PeriodicalId":11217,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31465-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to provide an approach in mitigating the adverse effects of mercury found in production fields which include the evaluation on the requirement for mercury treatment facility and suitable technology and best location for the production fields and onshore LNG facilities. The evaluation included assessment of pipeline integrity and managing unexpected increase in mercury content to ensure Mercury Removal Unit (MRU) is capable to treat the gas within the design specification The method includes mercury mapping and analysis of the results. Evaluation of technology and type at various streams in gas, condensate and water streams. There is no method to predict mercury production forecast and sizing cannot be based on one exploration well data only. Subsurface data might not be representative due to improper procedure, sampling, preservation and timing. Rigorous technology evaluation was evaluated for various mercury species covering its vulnerability to operations abnormalities such as entrainment of moisture, spikes of mercury content, changes to feed gas, hydrogen sulfide content, historical experience of mercury contamination and its impact to operations and performance of cryogenic systems and chemical injection for pipelines. Review of effectiveness of mercury removal technology for gas stream cover metal sulfide based adsorbent and metal oxide based with H2S in-situ sulfiding. In view that there is no proven technology for condensates stream, particulates mercury removal using filtration and hydrocyclones of the multiphase condensate /water and water streams were considered Mercury has exceeded downstream design specification and pose threats to existing LNG facilities aluminum cryogenic heat exchanger. Speciation, particle size distribution and the use of a practical size test rig on site, adsorbent -condensate compatibility test are approaches to determine the capacity of the MRU. Based on the selected technology, concepts were derived for gas and condensate to ascertain the feasibility of mercury removal, particulate filtration, mercury impact to pipeline integrity and the basis for the onshore mercury removal facility. This yielded seven (7) different concepts or options addressing both MRU gas and condensate either at offshore platform or onshore facilities. The concept select ascertained the optimum requirement to install the mercury removal unit onshore upstream of an Acid Gas Removal Unit in the LNG facilities. A two-stage filtration to remove mercury particulates above 1 micron was selected for offshore facility. Understanding the behaviour of mercury and the distribution tendencies into the various streams and factors that influence this distribution would provide insight on the integrity of production and pipeline system and management of mercury for operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陆上生产设施的海上汞管理
本文的目的是提供一种减轻在生产领域发现的汞的不利影响的方法,其中包括对汞处理设施和适当技术的要求以及生产领域和陆上液化天然气设施的最佳位置的评估。评估包括评估管道完整性和管理汞含量的意外增加,以确保汞去除装置(MRU)能够在设计规范范围内处理气体。方法包括汞测绘和结果分析。煤气、凝析油和水的各种流的技术和类型评价。目前还没有预测汞产量的方法,不能仅根据一口探井的数据进行预测。由于程序、采样、保存和计时不当,地下数据可能不具有代表性。对各种汞进行了严格的技术评估,包括其对操作异常的脆弱性,如水分夹带、汞含量峰值、原料气变化、硫化氢含量、汞污染的历史经验及其对低温系统和管道化学注入的操作和性能的影响。金属硫化物基吸附剂和硫化氢原位硫化金属氧化物气盖除汞技术的效果综述。鉴于目前尚没有成熟的冷凝液流除汞技术,采用过滤和水力旋流器对多相冷凝液/水和水流进行微粒汞去除被认为已超出下游设计规范,并对现有LNG设施铝低温换热器构成威胁。形态、粒度分布和现场实际粒度试验台的使用、吸附剂-凝结水相容性试验是确定MRU容量的方法。在选定技术的基础上,推导了天然气和凝析油的概念,以确定除汞、颗粒过滤、汞对管道完整性的影响的可行性,以及陆上除汞设施的基础。这产生了七种不同的概念或方案,适用于海上平台或陆上设施的MRU天然气和凝析油。概念选择确定了在液化天然气设施中酸性气体去除装置上游的陆上安装汞去除装置的最佳要求。海上设施选择了两级过滤,以去除1微米以上的汞颗粒。了解汞的行为和汞在各种河流中的分布趋势以及影响这种分布的因素,将有助于了解生产和管道系统的完整性以及作业中汞的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost Effective Framework of Integrated Development of Offshore Marginal Oilfields - Case Study of a Heavy Oil Reservoir with Thin Layers An Experimental Investigation into the Potential of a Green Alkali-Surfactant-Polymer Formulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Sandstone Reservoir World's First Arsenic in Condensate Removal for Oil & Gas Industry and its Universal Applications for Adsorption Facilities Digital Well Construction with Mud Motor Applications Coreflooding Experiments on PAM/PEI Polymer Gel for Water Control in High-Temperature and High-Pressure Conditions: With and Without Crossflow Effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1