When the Big Deal Gets Smaller: Use of ScienceDirect after Cancellations

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Portal-Libraries and the Academy Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1353/pla.2023.0012
Karen C. Kohn
{"title":"When the Big Deal Gets Smaller: Use of ScienceDirect after Cancellations","authors":"Karen C. Kohn","doi":"10.1353/pla.2023.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This study investigates how article downloads from ScienceDirect changed after Temple University Libraries downsized its all-inclusive Elsevier big deal bundle to a selective custom package. After the libraries lost current-year access to nearly half of Elsevier's active journals, the total downloads from Elsevier journals declined by 16.2 percent over three years. Combined use of still-subscribed and open access journals fell 10.6 percent in the same three years, suggesting that the drop in total use is due not only to the loss of journals but also to factors that would affect the remaining journals, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and a slight decrease in enrollment. Patrons may have substituted articles from still-subscribed and open access journals for those that were canceled, though the data are not conclusive. Reliance on open access appears to have increased.","PeriodicalId":51670,"journal":{"name":"Portal-Libraries and the Academy","volume":"2011 1","pages":"313 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portal-Libraries and the Academy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2023.0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:This study investigates how article downloads from ScienceDirect changed after Temple University Libraries downsized its all-inclusive Elsevier big deal bundle to a selective custom package. After the libraries lost current-year access to nearly half of Elsevier's active journals, the total downloads from Elsevier journals declined by 16.2 percent over three years. Combined use of still-subscribed and open access journals fell 10.6 percent in the same three years, suggesting that the drop in total use is due not only to the loss of journals but also to factors that would affect the remaining journals, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and a slight decrease in enrollment. Patrons may have substituted articles from still-subscribed and open access journals for those that were canceled, though the data are not conclusive. Reliance on open access appears to have increased.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当大交易变小时:在取消后使用ScienceDirect
本研究调查了天普大学图书馆将其包罗万象的爱思唯尔大交易包缩减为选择性定制包后,从ScienceDirect下载的文章发生了什么变化。在图书馆失去了对爱思唯尔近一半活跃期刊的访问权后,爱思唯尔期刊的总下载量在三年内下降了16.2%。在相同的三年中,仍在订阅的期刊和开放获取期刊的综合使用量下降了10.6%,这表明总使用量的下降不仅是由于期刊的减少,而且是由于可能影响剩余期刊的因素,例如COVID-19大流行和入学人数的轻微减少。赞助人可能已经从仍然订阅的和开放获取的期刊中替换了那些被取消的文章,尽管数据并不是决定性的。对开放获取的依赖似乎有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Portal-Libraries and the Academy
Portal-Libraries and the Academy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Student Preferences for Reference Services at a Remote Biological Station Library Addressing Classification System Bias in Higher Education Libraries in England A Case for Open Peer Review Podcasting in Academic Librarianship Requesting Librarian-Led Information Literacy Support: Instructor Approaches, Experiences, and Attitudes Meaningful Work when Work Won’t Love You Back: Sociological Imagination and Reflective Teaching Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1