Commutability assessment of 16 processed materials for 17-hydroxyprogesterone based on two approaches in China

Q4 Health Professions 中华检验医学杂志 Pub Date : 2020-01-11 DOI:10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-8158.2020.01.004
Qichen Long, Tianjiao Zhang, Ying Yan, Weiyan Zhou, Xin Li, Shuijun Li, Haijian Zhao, Wenxiang Chen, Chuanbao Zhang
{"title":"Commutability assessment of 16 processed materials for 17-hydroxyprogesterone based on two approaches in China","authors":"Qichen Long, Tianjiao Zhang, Ying Yan, Weiyan Zhou, Xin Li, Shuijun Li, Haijian Zhao, Wenxiang Chen, Chuanbao Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-8158.2020.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nThe aim of this study is to evaluate the commutability of 16 processed materials for 17-hydroxyprogesterone by using 2 commutability assessment approaches. \n \n \nMethods \n52 serum specimens were collected in Clinical Laboratory Department of Beijing Hospital from February 2018 to June 2019. According to the report of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (EP14-A3) document and the recommendations of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) working group on commutabilityassessment, serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone isotope diluent chromatogram tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC/MS/MS) was used for comparison. Three clinical routine analysis systems (1 radioimmunoassay, 2 LC/MS analysis methods) were used to determine the concentration of 17-hydroxyprogesterone in 52 human serum samples and 16 processed materialsfor commutabilityassessment. \n \n \nResults \nCombined with the results of the two commutability assessment, all accuracy verification materials and national steroid hormone standards showed good commutability in the LC/MS analysis system, and 6/9 EQA materials showed commutability in the three routine analysis systems.All materials showed good commutability in the LC/MS analysis system of bias difference method. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe two kinds of commutability assessment results are different. Bias difference method has more clinical value, but it has certain application limitations. The use of fresh frozen human serum as a quality assessment materialfor serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone is meets the commutability requirement. \n \n \nKey words: \n17-α-Hydroxyprogesterone; Quality control; Chromatography, liquid; Ttandem mass spectrometry","PeriodicalId":10096,"journal":{"name":"中华检验医学杂志","volume":"40 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华检验医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-8158.2020.01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the commutability of 16 processed materials for 17-hydroxyprogesterone by using 2 commutability assessment approaches. Methods 52 serum specimens were collected in Clinical Laboratory Department of Beijing Hospital from February 2018 to June 2019. According to the report of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (EP14-A3) document and the recommendations of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) working group on commutabilityassessment, serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone isotope diluent chromatogram tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC/MS/MS) was used for comparison. Three clinical routine analysis systems (1 radioimmunoassay, 2 LC/MS analysis methods) were used to determine the concentration of 17-hydroxyprogesterone in 52 human serum samples and 16 processed materialsfor commutabilityassessment. Results Combined with the results of the two commutability assessment, all accuracy verification materials and national steroid hormone standards showed good commutability in the LC/MS analysis system, and 6/9 EQA materials showed commutability in the three routine analysis systems.All materials showed good commutability in the LC/MS analysis system of bias difference method. Conclusions The two kinds of commutability assessment results are different. Bias difference method has more clinical value, but it has certain application limitations. The use of fresh frozen human serum as a quality assessment materialfor serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone is meets the commutability requirement. Key words: 17-α-Hydroxyprogesterone; Quality control; Chromatography, liquid; Ttandem mass spectrometry
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于两种方法的16种17-羟孕酮加工材料的可交换性评价
目的采用两种可交换性评价方法对16种17-羟孕酮原料的可交换性进行评价。方法2018年2月至2019年6月在北京医院检验科采集血清标本52份。根据临床和实验室标准研究所(EP14-A3)文件报告和国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)可交换性评估工作组的建议,采用血清17-羟孕酮同位素稀释色谱串联质谱法(ID-LC/MS/MS)进行比较。采用3种临床常规分析系统(1种放射免疫分析法,2种LC/MS分析法)测定52份人血清样品和16份加工材料中的17-羟孕酮浓度,进行可交换性评估。结果结合两种可交换性评价结果,所有准确度验证材料与类固醇激素国家标准品在LC/MS分析体系中均表现出良好的可交换性,6/9 EQA材料在3种常规分析体系中均表现出可交换性。在偏置差法的LC/MS分析系统中,所有材料均表现出良好的交换性。结论两种可交换性评价结果不同。偏倚差法具有较强的临床应用价值,但也存在一定的应用局限性。使用新鲜冷冻人血清作为血清17-羟孕酮的质量评价材料,满足可交换性要求。关键词:17-α-羟孕酮;质量控制;色谱法、液体;串联质谱法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华检验医学杂志
中华检验医学杂志 Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8037
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Clinical evaluation of four different detection reagents for 2019-nCoV IgM and IgG antibodies in patients with COVID-19 and suspected cases Potential value of extracellular vesicles/exosomes in diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 Chinese expert consensus on the rapid nucleic acid testing of 2019-nCoV COVID-19: immune response and its implications for disease monitoring and therapy Performance evaluation of six coronavirus nucleic acid detection reagents and matching analysis with nucleic acid extraction reagents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1