Improving Patient Access to Primary Care Providers Using a Pharmacist-Physician Co-Visit Model.

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer research Pub Date : 2023-10-10 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v14i2.5106
Diana Palandri, Hanna Raber, Casey Tak, Elizabeth Bald, Katherine Hastings, Karen Gunning
{"title":"Improving Patient Access to Primary Care Providers Using a Pharmacist-Physician Co-Visit Model.","authors":"Diana Palandri, Hanna Raber, Casey Tak, Elizabeth Bald, Katherine Hastings, Karen Gunning","doi":"10.24926/iip.v14i2.5106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Implementation of a clinical pharmacist in the primary care setting can offset provider time spent managing chronic diseases using Collaborative Practice Agreements (CPAs). The pharmacist-physician co-visit model presents an opportunity for pharmacists to increase patient access to their primary care provider (PCP). Studies of the co-visit model show that co-visits increase clinic efficiency by allowing the PCP to see additional patients and achieve more health care goals compared with independent visits<sup>1-4</sup>. <b>Objectives</b>: The aim of this study was to increase patient access to their PCP by utilizing a pharmacist-physician co-visit model at the Madsen Health Center Family Medicine (MHC FM) Clinic. The primary outcome was to identify the number of co-visits completed compared to the number of possible co-visits, and the number of appointment slots made available. The secondary outcomes were to track the time spent with patients and to obtain provider feedback via a survey. <b>Methods</b>: The co-visit model was implemented as a 4-month pilot study at the MHC FM Clinic. Complex care appointments lasting 40 minutes were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Potential co-visit appointments were identified one week prior then provider consent was obtained to change the appointment into two separate 20-minute visits. Schedules were reviewed to determine if the appointment slot opened by the co-visit was filled by another patient. Upon completion of the study, a survey was distributed to providers to collect feedback. <b>Results</b>: A total of five co-visits were completed out of a possible 19 (26%). All the appointments made available were filled by another patient. On average, the provider and pharmacist spent 15 and 14 minutes with the patient, respectively. <b>Conclusion</b>: Implementation of the physician-pharmacist co-visit model increased the availability of the PCP to see more patients without disrupting clinic workflow and provider schedules.</p>","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10653725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v14i2.5106","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Implementation of a clinical pharmacist in the primary care setting can offset provider time spent managing chronic diseases using Collaborative Practice Agreements (CPAs). The pharmacist-physician co-visit model presents an opportunity for pharmacists to increase patient access to their primary care provider (PCP). Studies of the co-visit model show that co-visits increase clinic efficiency by allowing the PCP to see additional patients and achieve more health care goals compared with independent visits1-4. Objectives: The aim of this study was to increase patient access to their PCP by utilizing a pharmacist-physician co-visit model at the Madsen Health Center Family Medicine (MHC FM) Clinic. The primary outcome was to identify the number of co-visits completed compared to the number of possible co-visits, and the number of appointment slots made available. The secondary outcomes were to track the time spent with patients and to obtain provider feedback via a survey. Methods: The co-visit model was implemented as a 4-month pilot study at the MHC FM Clinic. Complex care appointments lasting 40 minutes were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Potential co-visit appointments were identified one week prior then provider consent was obtained to change the appointment into two separate 20-minute visits. Schedules were reviewed to determine if the appointment slot opened by the co-visit was filled by another patient. Upon completion of the study, a survey was distributed to providers to collect feedback. Results: A total of five co-visits were completed out of a possible 19 (26%). All the appointments made available were filled by another patient. On average, the provider and pharmacist spent 15 and 14 minutes with the patient, respectively. Conclusion: Implementation of the physician-pharmacist co-visit model increased the availability of the PCP to see more patients without disrupting clinic workflow and provider schedules.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用药剂师-医生共同访问模式改善患者对初级保健提供者的访问。
背景:在初级保健设置临床药师可以抵消使用合作实践协议(cpa)管理慢性病的提供者的时间。药剂师-医生共同访问模式为药剂师提供了一个机会,以增加患者获得他们的初级保健提供者(PCP)。对共同就诊模式的研究表明,与独立就诊相比,共同就诊使PCP能够看到更多的病人,实现更多的医疗保健目标,从而提高了诊所效率1-4。目的:本研究的目的是利用Madsen健康中心家庭医学(MHC FM)诊所的药剂师-医生共同就诊模式,增加患者获得PCP的机会。主要结果是确定完成的共同就诊次数与可能的共同就诊次数的比较,以及可用的预约时间。次要结果是跟踪与患者在一起的时间,并通过调查获得提供者的反馈。方法:联合访视模式在MHC FM诊所实施了为期4个月的试点研究。根据纳入和排除标准选择持续40分钟的复杂护理预约。潜在的联合就诊预约在一周前确定,然后获得提供者同意将预约改为两次单独的20分钟就诊。检查了日程安排,以确定共同就诊开放的预约时间是否被其他患者填满。研究完成后,向供应商分发了一份调查问卷,以收集反馈。结果:在可能的19次(26%)中,共完成了5次共同就诊。所有的预约都被另一个病人填满了。平均而言,医生和药剂师与病人相处的时间分别为15分钟和14分钟。结论:医师-药剂师共同就诊模式的实施增加了PCP的可用性,在不中断临床工作流程和提供者时间表的情况下,为更多的患者提供了服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer research
Cancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
0.90%
发文量
7677
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Research, published by the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), is a journal that focuses on impactful original studies, reviews, and opinion pieces relevant to the broad cancer research community. Manuscripts that present conceptual or technological advances leading to insights into cancer biology are particularly sought after. The journal also places emphasis on convergence science, which involves bridging multiple distinct areas of cancer research. With primary subsections including Cancer Biology, Cancer Immunology, Cancer Metabolism and Molecular Mechanisms, Translational Cancer Biology, Cancer Landscapes, and Convergence Science, Cancer Research has a comprehensive scope. It is published twice a month and has one volume per year, with a print ISSN of 0008-5472 and an online ISSN of 1538-7445. Cancer Research is abstracted and/or indexed in various databases and platforms, including BIOSIS Previews (R) Database, MEDLINE, Current Contents/Life Sciences, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Polyamine Metabolism as a Metabolic Vulnerability in Prostate Cancer Treated with Supraphysiological Androgens. Retraction: Senescent Stromal Cells Promote Cancer Resistance through SIRT1 Loss-Potentiated Overproduction of Small Extracellular Vesicles. NSD1-Mediated PPARγ Methylation Enhances PTEN Activity to Suppress Glycolysis and Tumor Progression in Endometrial Cancer. In Silico Reconstruction of Primary and Metastatic Tumor Architecture using Geographic Information System-Augmented Spatial Transcriptomics Ribonuclease 5/Angiogenin Suppresses Intestinal Tumor Initiation by Maintaining Crypt Homeostasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1