{"title":"Oral versus initial intravenous therapy for urinary tract infections in young febrile children.","authors":"Robert M Jacobson MD","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.0062h.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <i>Background</i> The standard recommendation for treatment of young, febrile children with urinary tract infection has been hospitalization for intravenous antimicrobials. The availability of potent, oral, third-generation cephalosporins, as well as interest in cost containment and avoidance of nosocomial risks prompted evaluation of the safety and efficacy of outpatient therapy.</p><p> <i>Methods</i> In a multicentre, randomized clinical trial, the investigators evaluated the efficacy of oral versus initial intravenous therapy in 306 children 1 to 24 months old with fever and urinary tract infection, in terms of short-term clinical outcomes (sterilization of the urine and defervescence) and long-term morbidity (incidence of reinfection and incidence and extent of renal scarring documented at 6 months by <sup>99m</sup>Tc-dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scans). Children received either oral cefixime for 14 days (double dose on day 1) or initial intravenous cefotaxime for 3 days followed by oral cefixime for 11 days. Costs were estimated using charge-data.</p><p> <i>Results</i> Treatment groups were comparable regarding demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics. Of the short-term outcomes: (1) repeat urine cultures were sterile within 24 h in all 306 children, and (2) mean time to defervescence was 25 and 24 h for children treated orally and intravenously, respectively. Of the long-term outcomes: (1) symptomatic re-infections occurred in 4.6% of children treated orally and 7.2% of children treated intravenously; (2) renal scarring at 6 months was noted in 9.8% of children treated orally versus 7.2% of children treated intravenously; and (3) mean extent of scarring was ~8% in both treatment groups. Mean costs were at least twofold higher for children treated intravenously ($3577 versus $1473) compared with those treated orally.</p><p> <i>Conclusions</i> Oral cefixime can be recommended as a safe and effective treatment for children with fever and urinary tract infection. Use of cefixime will result in substantial reductions of health care expenditures.</p>","PeriodicalId":100075,"journal":{"name":"Ambulatory Child Health","volume":"6 1","pages":"72-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambulatory Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.0062h.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51
Abstract
Background The standard recommendation for treatment of young, febrile children with urinary tract infection has been hospitalization for intravenous antimicrobials. The availability of potent, oral, third-generation cephalosporins, as well as interest in cost containment and avoidance of nosocomial risks prompted evaluation of the safety and efficacy of outpatient therapy.
Methods In a multicentre, randomized clinical trial, the investigators evaluated the efficacy of oral versus initial intravenous therapy in 306 children 1 to 24 months old with fever and urinary tract infection, in terms of short-term clinical outcomes (sterilization of the urine and defervescence) and long-term morbidity (incidence of reinfection and incidence and extent of renal scarring documented at 6 months by 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scans). Children received either oral cefixime for 14 days (double dose on day 1) or initial intravenous cefotaxime for 3 days followed by oral cefixime for 11 days. Costs were estimated using charge-data.
Results Treatment groups were comparable regarding demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics. Of the short-term outcomes: (1) repeat urine cultures were sterile within 24 h in all 306 children, and (2) mean time to defervescence was 25 and 24 h for children treated orally and intravenously, respectively. Of the long-term outcomes: (1) symptomatic re-infections occurred in 4.6% of children treated orally and 7.2% of children treated intravenously; (2) renal scarring at 6 months was noted in 9.8% of children treated orally versus 7.2% of children treated intravenously; and (3) mean extent of scarring was ~8% in both treatment groups. Mean costs were at least twofold higher for children treated intravenously ($3577 versus $1473) compared with those treated orally.
Conclusions Oral cefixime can be recommended as a safe and effective treatment for children with fever and urinary tract infection. Use of cefixime will result in substantial reductions of health care expenditures.