A comparison of ecomorphology between introduced and native Australian dung beetles

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY Australian Journal of Zoology Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI:10.1071/ZO22044
A. Harvey, E. Sherratt
{"title":"A comparison of ecomorphology between introduced and native Australian dung beetles","authors":"A. Harvey, E. Sherratt","doi":"10.1071/ZO22044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Among the many catastrophic introductions of exotic species to Australia, the Australian Dung Beetle Project stands apart as a success story. From 1965 dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) were introduced for biological control purposes, and 23 species survived to become integrated into the environment with apparently little-to-no competition with native species. To understand this, we investigated ecomorphological diversity in the Australian dung beetle fauna, examining variation in functional traits among rolling and tunnelling species that are native to Australia and introduced. We found that introduced species are, on average, larger than native species of the same nidification strategy, but the size ranges overlap. Native and introduced tunnellers are convergent in body shape, whereas introduced rollers have distinct body shape compared with native species. Rollers and tunnellers also have distinct allometric patterns, where shape variation predicted by size aligns along two diverging allometric trajectories between nidification strategies. Our results suggest that ecomorphological differences do not explain the apparent lack of competition between tunnellers, but this may be the factor for rollers. Also, these results indicate that body size and associated allometric scaling is an important aspect of the ecomorphology of dung beetles that should be considered in future studies.","PeriodicalId":55420,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Zoology","volume":"2012 1","pages":"115 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO22044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Among the many catastrophic introductions of exotic species to Australia, the Australian Dung Beetle Project stands apart as a success story. From 1965 dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) were introduced for biological control purposes, and 23 species survived to become integrated into the environment with apparently little-to-no competition with native species. To understand this, we investigated ecomorphological diversity in the Australian dung beetle fauna, examining variation in functional traits among rolling and tunnelling species that are native to Australia and introduced. We found that introduced species are, on average, larger than native species of the same nidification strategy, but the size ranges overlap. Native and introduced tunnellers are convergent in body shape, whereas introduced rollers have distinct body shape compared with native species. Rollers and tunnellers also have distinct allometric patterns, where shape variation predicted by size aligns along two diverging allometric trajectories between nidification strategies. Our results suggest that ecomorphological differences do not explain the apparent lack of competition between tunnellers, but this may be the factor for rollers. Also, these results indicate that body size and associated allometric scaling is an important aspect of the ecomorphology of dung beetles that should be considered in future studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引进与澳洲本土屎壳郎生态形态之比较
摘要在许多灾难性的外来物种引进中,澳大利亚蜣螂项目是一个成功的故事。从1965年开始,为了生物防治目的引入了屎壳郎(鞘翅目:金龟子科),有23种幸存下来并融入了环境,与本地物种几乎没有竞争。为了理解这一点,我们研究了澳大利亚屎壳郎动物群的生态形态多样性,研究了澳大利亚本土和引进的滚洞和隧道屎壳郎的功能特征变化。我们发现,在相同的硝化策略下,引进物种平均比本地物种大,但大小范围重叠。土种掘进机与引进掘进机体型趋同,引进掘进机体型与本地掘进机不同。压路机和隧道掘进机也有不同的异速模式,其中形状变化预测的尺寸对齐沿两个不同的异速轨迹之间的硝化策略。我们的研究结果表明,生态形态的差异并不能解释掘进机之间明显缺乏竞争,但这可能是压路机的因素。此外,这些结果表明,体型和相关的异速缩放是屎壳虫生态形态学的一个重要方面,应该在未来的研究中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Zoology is an international journal publishing contributions on evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology. The journal focuses on Australasian fauna but also includes high-quality research from any region that has broader practical or theoretical relevance or that demonstrates a conceptual advance to any aspect of zoology. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: anatomy, physiology, molecular biology, genetics, reproductive biology, developmental biology, parasitology, morphology, behaviour, ecology, zoogeography, systematics and evolution. Australian Journal of Zoology is a valuable resource for professional zoologists, research scientists, resource managers, environmental consultants, students and amateurs interested in any aspect of the scientific study of animals. Australian Journal of Zoology is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
期刊最新文献
Green turtle (Chelonia mydas) hatching success at Raine and Heron Islands Tracking the spread of the eastern dwarf tree frog (Litoria fallax) in Australia using citizen science Phylogenetic relationships in the Eugongylini (Squamata: Scincidae): generic limits and biogeography Characterisation of volatile organic compounds in dingo scat and a comparison with those of the domestic dog Changes in parasite species distributions could be driven by host range expansions: the case of hybridisation between two Australian reptile ticks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1