Restrained Shrinkage of High Performance Concrete Comprising Silica Fume and Fly Ash

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Engineer-Journal of the Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka Pub Date : 2022-06-10 DOI:10.4038/engineer.v55i1.7482
M. Rekatheeban, H. Yapa
{"title":"Restrained Shrinkage of High Performance Concrete Comprising Silica Fume and Fly Ash","authors":"M. Rekatheeban, H. Yapa","doi":"10.4038/engineer.v55i1.7482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High performance concrete (HPC) is stronger/more durable than conventional concrete and its popularity has been widespread over the recent past. The composition of HPC is unique, for instance, it comprises high paste/aggregate volume, supplementary cementitious materials, etc. Consequently, some HPC characteristics are distinguished to be stern and one of those is shrinkage. For instance, HPC structures that are subjected to restrained conditions could experience undesirable non-structural cracking. In this context, this study assessed the restrained shrinkage behaviour of five HPC mixes conforming to the ASTM C1581 procedure. The mixes were designed for 50 MPa target cylinder compressive strength and comprised supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) of 0-10% silica fume (SF) and 0-30% fly ash (FA). The results showed that the control and 10%SF/30%FA mixes had comparatively lower cracking potential under restrained conditions whereas the highest cracking potential was with the 10%SF/0%FA and 10%SF/10%FA mixes. Hence, shrinkage exaggerated with the addition of SF whereas that undesirability was compensated with the addition of FA. Meanwhile, the compressive strength of the control mix was enhanced approximately by 48% with the inclusion of 10%SF whilst the FA inclusion to the 10%SF mix reduced the compressive strength fairly proportional to the FA content. Overall, the strength varied in the range of 49 – 73 MPa. Mix 10%SF/20%FA had 26.5% higher compressive strength than the control mix and showed low risk on restrained shrinkage cracking. Hence, it was identified as a promising HPC combination. Similarly, 10%SF/30FA mix showed similar strength and crack potential characteristics to the control mix. That mix was accordingly identified as an ideal sustainable concrete mix for highstrength concrete applications.","PeriodicalId":42812,"journal":{"name":"Engineer-Journal of the Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineer-Journal of the Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/engineer.v55i1.7482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High performance concrete (HPC) is stronger/more durable than conventional concrete and its popularity has been widespread over the recent past. The composition of HPC is unique, for instance, it comprises high paste/aggregate volume, supplementary cementitious materials, etc. Consequently, some HPC characteristics are distinguished to be stern and one of those is shrinkage. For instance, HPC structures that are subjected to restrained conditions could experience undesirable non-structural cracking. In this context, this study assessed the restrained shrinkage behaviour of five HPC mixes conforming to the ASTM C1581 procedure. The mixes were designed for 50 MPa target cylinder compressive strength and comprised supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) of 0-10% silica fume (SF) and 0-30% fly ash (FA). The results showed that the control and 10%SF/30%FA mixes had comparatively lower cracking potential under restrained conditions whereas the highest cracking potential was with the 10%SF/0%FA and 10%SF/10%FA mixes. Hence, shrinkage exaggerated with the addition of SF whereas that undesirability was compensated with the addition of FA. Meanwhile, the compressive strength of the control mix was enhanced approximately by 48% with the inclusion of 10%SF whilst the FA inclusion to the 10%SF mix reduced the compressive strength fairly proportional to the FA content. Overall, the strength varied in the range of 49 – 73 MPa. Mix 10%SF/20%FA had 26.5% higher compressive strength than the control mix and showed low risk on restrained shrinkage cracking. Hence, it was identified as a promising HPC combination. Similarly, 10%SF/30FA mix showed similar strength and crack potential characteristics to the control mix. That mix was accordingly identified as an ideal sustainable concrete mix for highstrength concrete applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掺硅灰和粉煤灰高性能混凝土的抑制收缩
高性能混凝土(HPC)比传统混凝土更坚固/更耐用,近年来得到了广泛的普及。高性能混凝土的组成是独特的,例如,它包括高膏体/骨料体积,补充胶凝材料等。因此,一些高性能混凝土特征被认为是严峻的,其中之一是收缩。例如,受约束条件的高性能混凝土结构可能会出现不希望出现的非结构性开裂。在此背景下,本研究评估了符合ASTM C1581程序的五种高性能混凝土混合料的抑制收缩行为。混合料的目标柱抗压强度为50 MPa,由0-10%硅灰(SF)和0-30%粉煤灰(FA)的补充胶凝材料(SCMs)组成。结果表明:在约束条件下,对照和10%SF/30%FA混合料的裂解电位相对较低,而10%SF/0%FA和10%SF/10%FA混合料的裂解电位最高;因此,收缩随着SF的加入而被夸大,而这种不受欢迎的情况则通过添加FA得到补偿。同时,10%SF的掺入使对照混合料的抗压强度提高了约48%,而10%SF掺入FA对混合料抗压强度的降低与FA含量成正比。总体而言,强度在49 - 73 MPa范围内变化。10%SF/20%FA掺合料的抗压强度比对照掺合料高26.5%,抑制收缩开裂风险低。因此,它被认为是一种很有前途的HPC组合。同样,10%SF/30FA混合料与对照混合料表现出相似的强度和裂纹潜在特性。因此,该混合料被确定为高强度混凝土应用的理想可持续混凝土混合料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
From the Editor… Review on the Estimation of Static Deformability Modulus of Rocks and their adoptability in Different Rock Masses Estimation Criteria for Static Rock Mass Deformability Modulus for Rock-Socket Design in Metamorphic Rock Masses Exploring Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using ArcGIS Techniques Integrated with Analytical Hierarchy Process under Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Kanakarayan Aru River Basin, Sri Lanka Lightning Protection of Stupas in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1