Validation of the Persian Adaptation of Academic Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in the EFL Context

Q3 Arts and Humanities Language Related Research Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.52547/lrr.13.5.6
Parastoo Alizadeh Oghyanous, M. Karimi, M. Hashemi
{"title":"Validation of the Persian Adaptation of Academic Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in the EFL Context","authors":"Parastoo Alizadeh Oghyanous, M. Karimi, M. Hashemi","doi":"10.52547/lrr.13.5.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study examined the content and construct validity, and internal consistency of the Academic Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (AERQ) in the Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context. The original scale was translated and back-translated between English and Persian. The content validity ratio (CVR), and content validity index (CVI) were then measured by a panel of 14 expert judges. The internal consistency coefficients of the scale were estimated by piloting it with 60 Iranian EFL learners. The results of the Cronbach’s alpha showed a satisfactory level of reliability. The AERQ was then administered to 346 English language learners ( M age = 19.34, SD age = 4.951). To explore the factorial structure of the 37 items of the questionnaire, an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted. In addition, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was run to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the AERQ’s measurement model. The results obtained from the modified measurement model showed an adequate fit of the data. In the modified version, two items (i.e., one item from suppression, and one from redirection of attention) were omitted due to low standardized loadings (< .50). The model fit indices also provided a reasonable model fit for the structural model. The internal consistency coefficients for the constructs were higher than the minimum value (α = .70). Implications and limitations of the study are discussed.","PeriodicalId":53465,"journal":{"name":"Language Related Research","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/lrr.13.5.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study examined the content and construct validity, and internal consistency of the Academic Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (AERQ) in the Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context. The original scale was translated and back-translated between English and Persian. The content validity ratio (CVR), and content validity index (CVI) were then measured by a panel of 14 expert judges. The internal consistency coefficients of the scale were estimated by piloting it with 60 Iranian EFL learners. The results of the Cronbach’s alpha showed a satisfactory level of reliability. The AERQ was then administered to 346 English language learners ( M age = 19.34, SD age = 4.951). To explore the factorial structure of the 37 items of the questionnaire, an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted. In addition, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was run to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the AERQ’s measurement model. The results obtained from the modified measurement model showed an adequate fit of the data. In the modified version, two items (i.e., one item from suppression, and one from redirection of attention) were omitted due to low standardized loadings (< .50). The model fit indices also provided a reasonable model fit for the structural model. The internal consistency coefficients for the constructs were higher than the minimum value (α = .70). Implications and limitations of the study are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术情绪调节问卷波斯语在英语语境下的适应性验证
本研究考察了学术情绪调节问卷(AERQ)在伊朗英语语境下的内容、结构效度和内部一致性。原始的比例尺在英语和波斯语之间被翻译和反译。内容效度比(CVR)和内容效度指数(CVI)由14位专家评委组成。通过对60名伊朗英语学习者进行试点,估计了量表的内部一致性系数。Cronbach 's alpha的结果显示了令人满意的可靠性。然后对346名英语学习者(M年龄= 19.34,SD年龄= 4.951)进行AERQ测试。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)对37项问卷的因子结构进行分析。此外,验证性因子分析(CFA)检验了AERQ测量模型的收敛效度和判别效度。修正后的测量模型得到的结果与数据拟合较好。在修改后的版本中,由于标准化负载低(< .50),省略了两个项目(即一个来自抑制的项目,一个来自注意重定向的项目)。模型拟合指标也为结构模型提供了合理的模型拟合。各构式的内部一致性系数均高于最小值(α = 0.70)。讨论了本研究的意义和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Related Research
Language Related Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Language Related Research is a platform to develop scientific thought in the specific fields of language sciences, enunciation and discourse. Accordingly, Language Related Research journal welcomes the original articles with theoretical, analytical and field work backgrounds. The Journal highly recommends the scholars avoid clichés and tautology with special focus on the diversity in the field of theorizing and applied background of language, corpus based studies and reference to the main domestic and international research. In the own field of theorizing and mindfulness however, issue-driven analysis based on original hypothesis, field works with quantitative and applied domain have the scientific priority for the journal.
期刊最新文献
Word-initial Voicing Contrast in Khuzestani Arabic Stops Developing and Validating a Questionnaire on EFL Teachers’ Beliefs about Task-based Language Teaching (TBLT) L2 Grit and Foreign Language Enjoyment: Arguments in Light of Control-Value Theory and Its Methodological Compatibility Revisiting Research on Positive Psychology in Second and Foreign Language Education: Trends and Directions The Effect of Topic on EFL Writing by Vietnamese Tertiary Students: Insights from Combining a Lexical Richness Analysis with Student Self-Reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1