Secular surge: a new fault line in American politics

IF 1.3 0 RELIGION Religion State & Society Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1080/09637494.2022.2104490
L. Marsden
{"title":"Secular surge: a new fault line in American politics","authors":"L. Marsden","doi":"10.1080/09637494.2022.2104490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The secular surge in US politics has been identified by almost every political pundit and academic working in the field, and in truth, there is little in Secular Surge that is not known intuitively or anecdotally by those same people. Where Campbell, Layman, and Green make an enormous contribution to the discipline, however, is in providing a well-researched evidential basis for that intuition. The authors have worked extensively in the field of religion and US politics over decades and have now turned their attention to that fastest growing of demographics: ‘the Nones’, described by the authors as those who choose to identify as having no religion. The authors helpfully disaggregate the group from a meaningless homo-geneity to meaningful specifics through dividing the Nones into Religionists, Non Religionists, Religious Secularists, and Secularists. With Nones accounting for around a quarter of the electorate, this is a timely analysis of this key demographic. Rather than the lazy assumption that Nones have abandoned their religious belief, the authors show that just over half of those self-identifying as Nones either believe in God or a higher power. The claim is that the growth in Nones does not simply represent a decline in religiosity but rather that it also signifies a positive identification as Secularists. The authors’ central argument American society is rapidly secularising and that a distinct, politically engaged Secular Left emerging the Religious Right the four decades. identity new fault line US alienated","PeriodicalId":45069,"journal":{"name":"Religion State & Society","volume":"73 1","pages":"488 - 489"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion State & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2022.2104490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The secular surge in US politics has been identified by almost every political pundit and academic working in the field, and in truth, there is little in Secular Surge that is not known intuitively or anecdotally by those same people. Where Campbell, Layman, and Green make an enormous contribution to the discipline, however, is in providing a well-researched evidential basis for that intuition. The authors have worked extensively in the field of religion and US politics over decades and have now turned their attention to that fastest growing of demographics: ‘the Nones’, described by the authors as those who choose to identify as having no religion. The authors helpfully disaggregate the group from a meaningless homo-geneity to meaningful specifics through dividing the Nones into Religionists, Non Religionists, Religious Secularists, and Secularists. With Nones accounting for around a quarter of the electorate, this is a timely analysis of this key demographic. Rather than the lazy assumption that Nones have abandoned their religious belief, the authors show that just over half of those self-identifying as Nones either believe in God or a higher power. The claim is that the growth in Nones does not simply represent a decline in religiosity but rather that it also signifies a positive identification as Secularists. The authors’ central argument American society is rapidly secularising and that a distinct, politically engaged Secular Left emerging the Religious Right the four decades. identity new fault line US alienated
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世俗浪潮:美国政治的新断层线
几乎每一位政治专家和在该领域工作的学者都认同美国政治中的世俗浪潮,事实上,在世俗浪潮中,几乎没有什么不是由这些人凭直觉或轶事知道的。然而,Campbell、Layman和Green对这一学科的巨大贡献在于为这种直觉提供了经过充分研究的证据基础。几十年来,作者在宗教和美国政治领域进行了广泛的研究,现在他们把注意力转向了增长最快的人口统计:“无信仰者”,作者将其描述为那些选择不信仰宗教的人。作者通过将无信者分为宗教主义者、非宗教主义者、宗教世俗主义者和世俗主义者,将无信者从无意义的同质性分解为有意义的具体特征。鉴于非裔选民约占选民总数的四分之一,这是对这一关键人群的及时分析。作者并没有懒懒地假设无信仰者已经放弃了他们的宗教信仰,而是表明,在那些自认为是无信仰者的人中,有一半以上的人要么相信上帝,要么相信更高的力量。这一观点认为,无宗教信仰者的增加并不仅仅代表宗教虔诚度的下降,而是表明了人们对世俗主义者的积极认同。作者的中心论点是,美国社会正在迅速世俗化,40年来,一个独特的、政治上参与的世俗左派出现在宗教右翼中。身份认同新断层线美国异化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Religion, State & Society has a long-established reputation as the leading English-language academic publication focusing on communist and formerly communist countries throughout the world, and the legacy of the encounter between religion and communism. To augment this brief Religion, State & Society has now expanded its coverage to include religious developments in countries which have not experienced communist rule, and to treat wider themes in a more systematic way. The journal encourages a comparative approach where appropriate, with the aim of revealing similarities and differences in the historical and current experience of countries, regions and religions, in stability or in transition.
期刊最新文献
Confessional culture, religiosity, and traditionalism: tracing the influence of religion on public attitudes towards European integration Conflict and coexistence among minorities within minority religions: a case study of Tablighi Jama’at in Japan Editors’ introduction Rage and carnage in the name of God: religious violence in Nigeria Religion and minority in Japanese contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1